/[MITgcm]/www.ecco-group.org/ecco_2011_pub.html
ViewVC logotype

Contents of /www.ecco-group.org/ecco_2011_pub.html

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log | View Revision Graph Revision Graph


Revision 1.2 - (show annotations) (download) (as text)
Mon Jan 17 22:50:33 2011 UTC (13 years, 3 months ago) by dimitri
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.1: +73 -4 lines
File MIME type: text/html
Some updates.  More later.

1 <ul><li>
2 J. Campin, C. Hill, H. Jones, and J. Marshall, 2011:
3 <a href="http://www-paoc.mit.edu/paoc/papers/superparam.pdf">
4 Superparameterization in ocean modeling: application to deep
5 convection.</a> Ocean Modeling, submitted.
6 </li></ul>
7
8 <ul><li>
9 X. Davis, L. Rothstein, W. Dewar, and D. Menemenlis, 2011:
10 <a href="http://ecco2.org/manuscripts/2010/DavisJcli10.pdf">
11 Numerical investigations of seasonal and interannual variability of
12 North Pacific Subtropical Mode Water and its implications for Pacific
13 climate variability.</a> J. Clim., in press.
14 </li></ul>
15
16 <ul><li>
17 E. Hill, D. Enderton, P. Heimbach, and C. Hill, 2011: SPGrid: A
18 numerical grid generation program for domain decomposed geophysical
19 fluid dynamics models. Mon. Weather Rev., submitted.
20 </li></ul>
21
22 <ul><li>
23 M. Manizza, M. Follows, S. Dutkiewicz, D. Menemenlis, J. McClelland,
24 C. Hill1, B. Peterson, R. Key, 2011:
25 <a href="http://ecco2.org/manuscripts/2010/ManizzaJGR2010.pdf">
26 Modeling the Arctic Ocean carbon cycle and its sensitivity to the
27 influence of the riverine dissolved organic carbon.</a>
28 J. Geophys. Res., submitted.
29 </li></ul>
30
31 <ul><li>
32 G. Maze, G. Forget, M. Buckley and J. Marshall, 2011: Using
33 transformation and formation maps to study water mass transformation:
34 a case study of North Atlantic Eighteen Degree water. J. Phys.
35 Oceanogr, submitted.
36 </li></ul>
37
38 <ul><li>
39 A. Nguyen, D. Menemenlis, and R. Kwok, 2011:
40 <a href="http://ecco2.org/manuscripts/2010/NguyenJGR10.pdf">
41 Arctic ice-ocean simulation with optimized model parameters: approach
42 and assessment.</a> J. Geophys. Res., submitted.
43 </li></ul>
44
45 <ul><li>
46 R. Tulloch, J. Marshall, C. Hill, and K. Smith, 2011:
47 <a href="http://ocean.mit.edu/~tulloch/Publications/tulloch_etaljpo10.pdf">
48 Scales, growth rates and spectral fluxes of baroclinic instability in
49 the ocean.</a> J. Phys. Oceanogr., submitted.
50 </li></ul>
51
52 <ul><li>
53 C. Ubelmann and L. Fu, 2011:
54 <a href="http://ecco2.org/manuscripts/2011/UbelmannFu2011.pdf">
55 Vorticity structures in the tropical Pacific from a numerical simulation.</a>
56 Geophys. J. Phys. Oceanogr., submitted.
57 </li></ul>
58
59 <ul><li>
60 N. Vinogradova, R. Ponte, M. Tamisiea, J. Davis, and
61 E. Hill, 2011: Effects of self-attraction and loading on annual
62 variations of ocean bottom pressure. J. Geophys. Res., submitted.
63 </li></ul>
64
65 <ul><li>
66 N. Vinogradova, R. Ponte, and P. Heimbach, 2011: Dynamics and forcing of sea
67 surface temperature variability on climate time scales. J. Clim., submitted.
68 </li></ul>
69
70 <ul><li>
71 D. Volkov and L. Fu, 2011: Mechanism for the interannual variability of the
72 Azores Current eddy energy. Geophys. Res. Let., submitted.
73 </li></ul>
74
75 <ul><li>
76 L. Zanna, P. Heimbach, A. Moore and E. Tziperman, 2011. Analysis of the
77 predictability and variability of the Atlantic ocean in response to optimal
78 surface excitation. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc., submitted.
79 </li></ul>

  ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.22