| 1 |
jmc |
1.1 |
% \documentclass[12pt]{article} |
| 2 |
|
|
% \usepackage{amssymb} |
| 3 |
|
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 5 |
|
|
%% \usepackage{graphics} |
| 6 |
|
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
|
| 8 |
|
|
% \oddsidemargin -4mm \evensidemargin 0mm |
| 9 |
|
|
% \textwidth 165mm |
| 10 |
|
|
% \textheight 230mm |
| 11 |
|
|
% \topmargin -2mm \headsep -2mm |
| 12 |
|
|
% \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.5} |
| 13 |
|
|
% \begin{document} |
| 14 |
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
|
| 16 |
|
|
\def\deg{$^o$} |
| 17 |
|
|
%%%--------------------------------------%%% |
| 18 |
edhill |
1.2 |
\section{Thermodynamic Sea Ice Package: ``thsice''} |
| 19 |
jmc |
1.1 |
|
| 20 |
|
|
{\bf Important note:} |
| 21 |
|
|
This document has been written by Stephanie Dutkiewicz |
| 22 |
|
|
and describes an earlier implementation of the sea-ice package. |
| 23 |
|
|
This needs to be updated to reflect the recent changes (JMC). |
| 24 |
|
|
|
| 25 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 26 |
|
|
This thermodynamic ice model is based on the 3-layer model by Winton (2000). |
| 27 |
|
|
and the energy-conserving LANL CICE model (Bitz and Lipscomb, 1999). |
| 28 |
|
|
The model considers two equally thick ice layers; the upper layer has |
| 29 |
|
|
a variable specific heat resulting from brine pockets, |
| 30 |
|
|
the lower layer has a fixed heat capacity. A zero heat capacity snow |
| 31 |
|
|
layer lies above the ice. Heat fluxes at the top and bottom |
| 32 |
|
|
surfaces are used to calculate the change in ice and snow layer |
| 33 |
|
|
thickness. Grid cells of the ocean model are |
| 34 |
|
|
either fully covered in ice or are open water. There is |
| 35 |
|
|
a provision to parametrize ice fraction (and leads) in this package. |
| 36 |
|
|
Modifications are discussed in small font following the |
| 37 |
|
|
subroutine descriptions. |
| 38 |
|
|
|
| 39 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 40 |
|
|
|
| 41 |
|
|
\vspace{1cm} |
| 42 |
|
|
|
| 43 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 44 |
|
|
The ice model is called from {\it thermodynamics.F}, subroutine |
| 45 |
|
|
{\it ice\_forcing.F} is called in place of {\it external\_forcing\_surf.F}. |
| 46 |
|
|
|
| 47 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 48 |
|
|
|
| 49 |
|
|
\vspace{1cm} |
| 50 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 51 |
|
|
{\bf \underline{subroutine ICE\_FORCING}} |
| 52 |
|
|
|
| 53 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 54 |
|
|
In {\it ice\_forcing.F}, we calculate the freezing potential of the |
| 55 |
|
|
ocean model surface layer of water: |
| 56 |
|
|
\[ |
| 57 |
|
|
{\bf frzmlt} = (T_f - SST) \frac{c_{sw} \rho_{sw} \Delta z}{\Delta t} |
| 58 |
|
|
\] |
| 59 |
|
|
where $c_{sw}$ is seawater heat capacity, |
| 60 |
|
|
$\rho_{sw}$ is the seawater density, $\Delta z$ |
| 61 |
|
|
is the ocean model upper layer thickness and $\Delta t$ is the model (tracer) |
| 62 |
|
|
timestep. The freezing temperature, $T_f=\mu S$ is a function of the |
| 63 |
|
|
salinity. |
| 64 |
|
|
|
| 65 |
|
|
|
| 66 |
|
|
1) Provided there is no ice present and {\bf frzmlt} is less than 0, |
| 67 |
|
|
the surface tendencies of wind, heat and freshwater are calculated |
| 68 |
|
|
as usual (ie. as in {\it external\_forcing\_surf.F}). |
| 69 |
|
|
|
| 70 |
|
|
2) If there is ice present in the grid cell |
| 71 |
|
|
we call the main ice model routine {\it ice\_therm.F} (see below). |
| 72 |
|
|
Output from this routine gives net heat and freshwater flux |
| 73 |
|
|
affecting the top of the ocean. |
| 74 |
|
|
|
| 75 |
|
|
Subroutine {\it ice\_forcing.F} uses these values to find the |
| 76 |
|
|
sea surface tendencies |
| 77 |
|
|
in grid cells. When there is ice present, |
| 78 |
|
|
the surface stress tendencies are |
| 79 |
|
|
set to zero; the ice model is purely thermodynamic and the |
| 80 |
|
|
effect of ice motion on the sea-surface is not examined. |
| 81 |
|
|
|
| 82 |
|
|
Relaxation of surface $T$ and $S$ is only allowed equatorward |
| 83 |
|
|
of {\bf relaxlat} (see {\bf DATA.ICE below}), and no relaxation is |
| 84 |
|
|
allowed under the ice at any latitude. |
| 85 |
|
|
|
| 86 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 87 |
|
|
{\tiny (Note that there is provision for allowing grid cells to have both |
| 88 |
|
|
open water and seaice; if {\bf compact} is between 0 and 1)} |
| 89 |
|
|
|
| 90 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 91 |
|
|
\vspace{1cm} |
| 92 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 93 |
|
|
{\bf {\underline{ subroutine ICE\_FREEZE}}} |
| 94 |
|
|
|
| 95 |
|
|
This routine is called from {\it thermodynamics.F} |
| 96 |
|
|
after the new temperature calculation, {\it calc\_gt.F}, |
| 97 |
|
|
but before {\it calc\_gs.F}. |
| 98 |
|
|
In {\it ice\_freeze.F}, any ocean upper layer grid cell |
| 99 |
|
|
with no ice cover, but with temperature below freezing, |
| 100 |
|
|
$T_f=\mu S$ has ice initialized. |
| 101 |
|
|
We calculate {\bf frzmlt} from all the grid cells in |
| 102 |
|
|
the water column that have a temperature less than |
| 103 |
|
|
freezing. In this routine, any water below the surface |
| 104 |
|
|
that is below freezing is set to $T_f$. |
| 105 |
|
|
A call to |
| 106 |
|
|
{\it ice\_start.F} is made if {\bf frzmlt} $>0$, |
| 107 |
|
|
and salinity tendancy is updated for brine release. |
| 108 |
|
|
|
| 109 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 110 |
|
|
{\tiny (There is a provision for fractional ice: |
| 111 |
|
|
In the case where the grid cell has less ice coverage than |
| 112 |
|
|
{\bf icemaskmax} we allow {\it ice\_start.F} to be called).} |
| 113 |
|
|
|
| 114 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 115 |
|
|
|
| 116 |
|
|
\vspace{1cm} |
| 117 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 118 |
|
|
{\bf {\underline{ subroutine ICE\_START}}} |
| 119 |
|
|
|
| 120 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 121 |
|
|
The energy available from freezing |
| 122 |
|
|
the sea surface is brought into this routine as {\bf esurp}. |
| 123 |
|
|
The enthalpy of the 2 layers of any new ice is calculated as: |
| 124 |
|
|
\begin{eqnarray} |
| 125 |
|
|
q_1 & = & -c_{i}*T_f + L_i \nonumber \\ |
| 126 |
|
|
q_2 & = & -c_{f}T_{mlt}+ c_{i}(T_{mlt}-T{f}) + L_i(1-\frac{T_{mlt}}{T_f} |
| 127 |
|
|
\nonumber \\ |
| 128 |
|
|
\end{eqnarray} |
| 129 |
|
|
where $c_f$ is specific heat of liquid fresh water, $c_i$ is the |
| 130 |
|
|
specific heat of fresh ice, $L_i$ is latent heat of freezing, |
| 131 |
|
|
$\rho_i$ is density of ice and |
| 132 |
|
|
$T_{mlt}$ is melting temperature of ice with salinity of 1. |
| 133 |
|
|
The height of a new layer of ice is |
| 134 |
|
|
\[ |
| 135 |
|
|
h_{i new} = \frac{{\bf esurp} \Delta t}{qi_{0av}} |
| 136 |
|
|
\] |
| 137 |
|
|
where $qi_{0av}=-\frac{\rho_i}{2} (q_1+q_2)$. |
| 138 |
|
|
|
| 139 |
|
|
The surface skin temperature $T_s$ and ice temperatures |
| 140 |
|
|
$T_1$, $T_2$ and the sea surface temperature are set at $T_f$. |
| 141 |
|
|
|
| 142 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 143 |
|
|
{\tiny ( There is provision for fractional ice: |
| 144 |
|
|
new ice is formed over open water; the first freezing in the cell |
| 145 |
|
|
must have a height of {\bf himin0}; this determines the ice |
| 146 |
|
|
fraction {\bf compact}. If there is already ice in the grid cell, |
| 147 |
|
|
the new ice must have the same height and the new ice fraction |
| 148 |
|
|
is |
| 149 |
|
|
\[ |
| 150 |
|
|
i_f=(1-\hat{i_f}) \frac{h_{i new}}{h_i} |
| 151 |
|
|
\] |
| 152 |
|
|
where $\hat{i_f}$ is ice fraction from previous timestep |
| 153 |
|
|
and $h_i$ is current ice height. Snow is redistributed |
| 154 |
|
|
over the new ice fraction. The ice fraction is |
| 155 |
|
|
not allowed to become larger than {\bf iceMaskmax} and |
| 156 |
|
|
if the ice height is above {\bf hihig} then freezing energy |
| 157 |
|
|
comes from the full grid cell, ice growth does not occur |
| 158 |
|
|
under orginal ice due to freezing water. |
| 159 |
|
|
} |
| 160 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 161 |
|
|
|
| 162 |
|
|
\vspace{1cm} |
| 163 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 164 |
|
|
{\bf {\underline{subroutine ICE\_THERM}}} |
| 165 |
|
|
|
| 166 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 167 |
|
|
The main subroutine of this package is {\it ice\_therm.F} where the |
| 168 |
|
|
ice temperatures are calculated and the changes in ice and snow |
| 169 |
|
|
thicknesses are determined. Output provides the net heat and fresh |
| 170 |
|
|
water fluxes that force the top layer of the ocean model. |
| 171 |
|
|
|
| 172 |
|
|
If the current ice height is less than {\bf himin} then |
| 173 |
|
|
the ice layer is set to zero and the ocean model upper layer temperature |
| 174 |
|
|
is allowed to drop lower than its freezing temperature; and atmospheric |
| 175 |
|
|
fluxes are allowed to effect the grid cell. |
| 176 |
|
|
If the ice height is greater than {\bf himin} we proceed with |
| 177 |
|
|
the ice model calculation. |
| 178 |
|
|
|
| 179 |
|
|
We follow the procedure |
| 180 |
|
|
of Winton (1999) -- see equations 3 to 21 -- to calculate |
| 181 |
|
|
the surface and internal ice temperatures. |
| 182 |
|
|
The surface temperature is found from the balance of the |
| 183 |
|
|
flux at the surface $F_s$, the shortwave heat flux absorbed by the ice, |
| 184 |
|
|
{\bf fswint}, and |
| 185 |
|
|
the upward conduction of heat through the snow and/or ice, $F_u$. |
| 186 |
|
|
We linearize $F_s$ about the surface temperature, $\hat{T_s}$, |
| 187 |
|
|
at the previous timestep (where \mbox{}$\hat{ }$ indicates the value at |
| 188 |
|
|
the previous timestep): |
| 189 |
|
|
\[ |
| 190 |
|
|
F_s (T_s) = F_s(\hat{T_s}) + \frac{\partial F_s(\hat{T_s)}}{\partial T_s} |
| 191 |
|
|
(T_s-\hat{T_s}) |
| 192 |
|
|
\] |
| 193 |
|
|
where, |
| 194 |
|
|
\[ |
| 195 |
|
|
F_s = F_{sensible}+F_{latent}+F_{longwave}^{down}+F_{longwave}^{up}+ (1- |
| 196 |
|
|
\alpha) F_{shortwave} |
| 197 |
|
|
\] |
| 198 |
|
|
and |
| 199 |
|
|
\[ |
| 200 |
|
|
\frac{d F_s}{dT} = \frac{d F_{sensible}}{dT} + \frac{d F_{latent}}{dT} |
| 201 |
|
|
+\frac{d F_{longwave}^{up}}{dT}. |
| 202 |
|
|
\] |
| 203 |
|
|
$F_s$ and $\frac{d F_s}{dT}$ are currently calculated from the {\bf BULKF} |
| 204 |
|
|
package described separately, but could also be provided by an atmospheric |
| 205 |
|
|
model. The surface albedo is calculated from the ice height and/or |
| 206 |
|
|
surface temperature (see below, {\it srf\_albedo.F}) and the |
| 207 |
|
|
shortwave flux absorbed in the ice is |
| 208 |
|
|
\[ |
| 209 |
|
|
{\bf fswint} = (1-e^{\kappa_i h_i})(1-\alpha) F_{shortwave} |
| 210 |
|
|
\] |
| 211 |
|
|
where $\kappa_i$ is bulk extinction coefficient. |
| 212 |
|
|
|
| 213 |
|
|
The conductive flux to the surface is |
| 214 |
|
|
\[ |
| 215 |
|
|
F_u=K_{1/2}(T_1-T_s) |
| 216 |
|
|
\] |
| 217 |
|
|
where $K_{1/2}$ is the effective conductive coupling of the snow-ice |
| 218 |
|
|
layer between the surface and the mid-point of the upper layer of ice |
| 219 |
|
|
$ |
| 220 |
|
|
K_{1/2}=\frac{4 K_i K_s}{K_s h_i + 4 K_i h_s} |
| 221 |
|
|
$. |
| 222 |
|
|
$K_i$ and $K_s$ are constant thermal conductivities of seaice and snow. |
| 223 |
|
|
|
| 224 |
|
|
From the above equations we can develop a system of equations to |
| 225 |
|
|
find the skin surface temperature, $T_s$ and the two ice layer |
| 226 |
|
|
temperatures (see Winton, 1999, for details). We solve these |
| 227 |
|
|
equations iteratively until the change in $T_s$ is small. |
| 228 |
|
|
When the surface temperature is greater then |
| 229 |
|
|
the melting temperature of the surface, the temperatures are |
| 230 |
|
|
recalculated setting $T_s$ to 0. The enthalpy |
| 231 |
|
|
of the ice layers are calculated in order to keep track of the energy in the |
| 232 |
|
|
ice model. Enthalpy is defined, here, as the energy required to melt a |
| 233 |
|
|
unit mass of seaice with temperature $T$. |
| 234 |
|
|
For the upper layer (1) with brine pockets and |
| 235 |
|
|
the lower fresh layer (2): |
| 236 |
|
|
\begin{eqnarray} |
| 237 |
|
|
q_1 & = & - c_f T_f + c_i (T_f-T)+ L_{i}(1-\frac{T_f}{T}) |
| 238 |
|
|
\nonumber \\ |
| 239 |
|
|
q_2 & = & -c_i T+L_i \nonumber |
| 240 |
|
|
\end{eqnarray} |
| 241 |
|
|
where $c_f$ is specific heat of liquid fresh water, $c_i$ is the |
| 242 |
|
|
specific heat of fresh ice, and $L_i$ is latent heat of melting fresh ice. |
| 243 |
|
|
|
| 244 |
|
|
|
| 245 |
|
|
|
| 246 |
|
|
From the new ice temperatures, we can calculate |
| 247 |
|
|
the energy flux at the surface available for melting (if $T_s$=0) |
| 248 |
|
|
and the energy at the ocean-ice interface for either melting or freezing. |
| 249 |
|
|
\begin{eqnarray} |
| 250 |
|
|
E_{top} & = & (F_s- K_{1/2}(T_s-T_1) ) \Delta t |
| 251 |
|
|
\nonumber \\ |
| 252 |
|
|
E_{bot} &= & (\frac{4K_i(T_2-T_f)}{h_i}-F_b) \Delta t |
| 253 |
|
|
\nonumber |
| 254 |
|
|
\end{eqnarray} |
| 255 |
|
|
where $F_b$ is the heat flux at the ice bottom due to the sea surface |
| 256 |
|
|
temperature variations from freezing. |
| 257 |
|
|
If $T_{sst}$ is above freezing, $F_b=c_{sw} \rho_{sw} |
| 258 |
|
|
\gamma (T_{sst}-T_f)u^{*}$, $\gamma$ is the heat transfer coefficient |
| 259 |
|
|
and $u^{*}=QQ$ is frictional velocity between ice |
| 260 |
|
|
and water. If $T_{sst}$ is below freezing, |
| 261 |
|
|
$F_b=(T_f - T_{sst})c_f \rho_f \Delta z /\Delta t$ and set $T_{sst}$ |
| 262 |
|
|
to $T_f$. We also |
| 263 |
|
|
include the energy from lower layers that drop below freezing, |
| 264 |
|
|
and set those layers to $T_f$. |
| 265 |
|
|
|
| 266 |
|
|
If $E_{top}>0$ we melt snow from the surface, if all the snow is melted |
| 267 |
|
|
and there is energy left, we melt the ice. If the ice is all gone |
| 268 |
|
|
and there is still energy left, we apply the left over energy to |
| 269 |
|
|
heating the ocean model upper layer (See Winton, 1999, equations 27-29). |
| 270 |
|
|
Similarly if $E_{bot}>0$ we melt ice from the bottom. If all the ice |
| 271 |
|
|
is melted, the snow is melted (with energy from the ocean model upper layer |
| 272 |
|
|
if necessary). If $E_{bot}<0$ we grow ice at the bottom |
| 273 |
|
|
\[ |
| 274 |
|
|
\Delta h_i = \frac{-E_{bot}}{(q_{bot} \rho_i)} |
| 275 |
|
|
\] |
| 276 |
|
|
where $q_{bot}=-c_{i} T_f + L_i$ is the enthalpy of the new ice, |
| 277 |
|
|
The enthalpy of the second ice layer, $q_2$ needs to be modified: |
| 278 |
|
|
\[ |
| 279 |
|
|
q_2 = \frac{ \hat{h_i}/2 \hat{q_2} + \Delta h_i q_{bot} } |
| 280 |
|
|
{\hat{h_i}/{2}+\Delta h_i} |
| 281 |
|
|
\] |
| 282 |
|
|
|
| 283 |
|
|
If there is a ice layer and the overlying air temperature is |
| 284 |
|
|
below 0$^o$C then any precipitation, $P$ joins the snow layer: |
| 285 |
|
|
\[ |
| 286 |
|
|
\Delta h_s = -P \frac{\rho_f}{\rho_s} \Delta t, |
| 287 |
|
|
\] |
| 288 |
|
|
$\rho_f$ and $\rho_s$ are the fresh water and snow densities. |
| 289 |
|
|
Any evaporation, similarly, removes snow or ice from the surface. |
| 290 |
|
|
We also calculate the snow age here, in case it is needed for |
| 291 |
|
|
the surface albedo calculation (see {\it srf\_albedo.F} below). |
| 292 |
|
|
|
| 293 |
|
|
For practical reasons we limit the ice growth to {\bf hilim} |
| 294 |
|
|
and snow is limited to {\bf hslim}. We converts any |
| 295 |
|
|
ice and/or snow above these limits back to water, maintaining the salt |
| 296 |
|
|
balance. Note however, that heat is not conserved in this |
| 297 |
|
|
conversion; sea surface temperatures below the ice are not |
| 298 |
|
|
recalculated. |
| 299 |
|
|
|
| 300 |
|
|
If the snow/ice interface is below the waterline, snow is converted |
| 301 |
|
|
to ice (see Winton, 1999, equations 35 and 36). The subroutine |
| 302 |
|
|
{\it new\_layers\_winton.F}, described below, repartitions the ice into |
| 303 |
|
|
equal thickness layers while conserving energy. |
| 304 |
|
|
|
| 305 |
|
|
The subroutine {\it ice\_therm.F} now calculates the heat and fresh |
| 306 |
|
|
water fluxes affecting the ocean model surface layer. The heat flux: |
| 307 |
|
|
\[ |
| 308 |
|
|
q_{net}= {\bf fswocn} - F_{b} - \frac{{\bf esurp}}{\Delta t} |
| 309 |
|
|
\] |
| 310 |
|
|
is composed of the shortwave flux that has passed through the |
| 311 |
|
|
ice layer and is absorbed by the water, {\bf fswocn}$=QQ$, |
| 312 |
|
|
the ocean flux to the ice $F_b$, |
| 313 |
|
|
and the surplus energy left over from the melting, {\bf esurp}. |
| 314 |
|
|
The fresh water flux is determined from the amount of |
| 315 |
|
|
fresh water and salt in the ice/snow system before and after the |
| 316 |
|
|
timestep. |
| 317 |
|
|
|
| 318 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 319 |
|
|
{\tiny (There is a provision for fractional ice: |
| 320 |
|
|
If ice height is above {\bf hihig} then all energy from freezing at |
| 321 |
|
|
sea surface is used only in the open water aparts of the cell (ie. |
| 322 |
|
|
$F_b$ will only have the conduction term). |
| 323 |
|
|
The melt energy is partitioned by {\bf frac\_energy} between melting |
| 324 |
|
|
ice height and ice extent. However, once ice height drops below |
| 325 |
|
|
{\bf himon0} then all energy melts ice extent.} |
| 326 |
|
|
|
| 327 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 328 |
|
|
\vspace{1cm} |
| 329 |
|
|
|
| 330 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 331 |
|
|
{\bf {\underline{subroutine SFC\_ALBEDO} } } |
| 332 |
|
|
|
| 333 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 334 |
|
|
The routine {\it ice\_therm.F} calls this routine to determine |
| 335 |
|
|
the surface albedo. There are two calculations provided here: |
| 336 |
|
|
|
| 337 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 338 |
|
|
{\bf 1)} from LANL CICE model |
| 339 |
|
|
\[ \alpha = f_s \alpha_s + (1-f_s) (\alpha_{i_{min}} |
| 340 |
|
|
+ (\alpha_{i_{max}}- \alpha_{i_{min}}) (1-e^{-h_i/h_{\alpha}})) |
| 341 |
|
|
\] |
| 342 |
|
|
where $f_s$ is 1 if there is snow, 0 if not; the snow albedo, |
| 343 |
|
|
$\alpha_s$ has two values |
| 344 |
|
|
depending on whether $T_s<0$ or not; $\alpha_{i_{min}}$ and |
| 345 |
|
|
$\alpha_{i_{max}}$ are ice albedos for thin melting ice, and |
| 346 |
|
|
thick bare ice respectively, and $h_{\alpha}$ is a scale |
| 347 |
|
|
height. |
| 348 |
|
|
|
| 349 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 350 |
|
|
{\bf 2)} From GISS model (Hansen et al 1983) |
| 351 |
|
|
\[ |
| 352 |
|
|
\alpha = \alpha_i e^{-h_s/h_a} + \alpha_s (1-e^{-h_s/h_a}) |
| 353 |
|
|
\] |
| 354 |
|
|
where $\alpha_i$ is a constant albedo for bare ice, $h_a$ |
| 355 |
|
|
is a scale height and $\alpha_s$ is a variable snow albedo. |
| 356 |
|
|
\[ |
| 357 |
|
|
\alpha_s = \alpha_1 + \alpha_2 e^{-\lambda_a a_s} |
| 358 |
|
|
\] |
| 359 |
|
|
where $\alpha_1$ is a constant, $\alpha_2$ depends on $T_s$, |
| 360 |
|
|
$a_s$ is the snow age, and $\lambda_a$ is a scale frequency. |
| 361 |
|
|
The snow age is calculated in {\it ice\_therm.F} and is given |
| 362 |
|
|
in equation 41 in Hansen et al (1983). |
| 363 |
|
|
|
| 364 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 365 |
|
|
|
| 366 |
|
|
\vspace{1cm} |
| 367 |
|
|
|
| 368 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 369 |
|
|
{\bf {\underline{subroutine NEW\_LAYERS\_WINTON}}} |
| 370 |
|
|
|
| 371 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 372 |
|
|
The subroutine |
| 373 |
|
|
{\it new\_layers\_winton.F} repartitions the ice into |
| 374 |
|
|
equal thickness layers while conserving energy. We pass |
| 375 |
|
|
to this subroutine, the ice layer enthalpies after |
| 376 |
|
|
melting/growth and the new height of the ice layers. |
| 377 |
|
|
The ending layer height should be half the sum of the |
| 378 |
|
|
new ice heights from {\it ice\_therm.F}. The enthalpies |
| 379 |
|
|
of the ice layers are adjusted accordingly to maintain |
| 380 |
|
|
total energy in the ice model. If layer 2 height is |
| 381 |
|
|
greater than layer 1 height then layer 2 gives ice to |
| 382 |
|
|
layer 1 and: |
| 383 |
|
|
\[ |
| 384 |
|
|
q_1=f_1 \hat{q_1} + (1-f1) \hat{q_2} |
| 385 |
|
|
\] |
| 386 |
|
|
where $f_1$ is the fraction of the new to old upper layer heights. |
| 387 |
|
|
$T_1$ will therefore also have changed. |
| 388 |
|
|
Similarly for when ice layer height 2 is less than |
| 389 |
|
|
layer 1 height, except here we need to to be careful |
| 390 |
|
|
that the new $T_2$ does not fall below the melting temperature. |
| 391 |
|
|
|
| 392 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 393 |
|
|
|
| 394 |
|
|
\vspace{1cm} |
| 395 |
|
|
|
| 396 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 397 |
|
|
{\bf {\underline{Initializing subroutines}}} |
| 398 |
|
|
|
| 399 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 400 |
|
|
{\it ice\_init.F}: |
| 401 |
|
|
Set ice variables to zero, or reads in pickup information |
| 402 |
|
|
from {\bf pickup.ic} (which was written out in {\it checkpoint.F}) |
| 403 |
|
|
|
| 404 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 405 |
|
|
{\it ice\_readparms.F}: |
| 406 |
|
|
Reads {\bf data.ice} |
| 407 |
|
|
|
| 408 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 409 |
|
|
|
| 410 |
|
|
\vspace{1cm} |
| 411 |
|
|
|
| 412 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 413 |
|
|
{\bf {\underline{Diagnostic subroutines}}} |
| 414 |
|
|
|
| 415 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 416 |
|
|
{\it ice\_ave.F}: |
| 417 |
|
|
Keeps track of means of the ice variables |
| 418 |
|
|
|
| 419 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 420 |
|
|
{\it ice\_diags.F}: |
| 421 |
|
|
Finds averages and writes out diagnostics |
| 422 |
|
|
|
| 423 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 424 |
|
|
\vspace{1cm} |
| 425 |
|
|
|
| 426 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 427 |
|
|
{\bf {\underline{Common Blocks}}} |
| 428 |
|
|
|
| 429 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 430 |
|
|
{\it ICE.h}: Ice Varibles, also |
| 431 |
|
|
{\bf relaxlat} and {\bf startIceModel} |
| 432 |
|
|
|
| 433 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 434 |
|
|
{\it ICE\_DIAGS.h}: matrices for diagnostics: averages of fields |
| 435 |
|
|
from {\it ice\_diags.F} |
| 436 |
|
|
|
| 437 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 438 |
|
|
{\it BULKF\_ICE\_CONSTANTS.h} (in {\bf BULKF} package): |
| 439 |
|
|
all the parameters need by the ice model |
| 440 |
|
|
|
| 441 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 442 |
|
|
\vspace{1cm} |
| 443 |
|
|
|
| 444 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 445 |
|
|
{\bf {\underline{Input file DATA.ICE}}} |
| 446 |
|
|
|
| 447 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 448 |
|
|
Here we need to set {\bf StartIceModel}: which is 1 if the |
| 449 |
|
|
model starts from no ice; and 0 if there is a pickup file |
| 450 |
|
|
with the ice matrices ({\bf pickup.ic}) which is read |
| 451 |
|
|
in {\it ice\_init.F} and written out in {\it checkpoint.F}. |
| 452 |
|
|
The parameter {\bf relaxlat} defines the latitude poleward |
| 453 |
|
|
of which there is no relaxing of surface $T$ or $S$ to |
| 454 |
|
|
observations. This avoids the relaxation forcing the ice |
| 455 |
|
|
model at these high latitudes. |
| 456 |
|
|
|
| 457 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 458 |
|
|
({\tiny Note: {\bf hicemin} is set to 0 here. If the |
| 459 |
|
|
provision for allowing grid cells to have both |
| 460 |
|
|
open water and seaice is ever implemented, this would |
| 461 |
|
|
be greater than 0}) |
| 462 |
|
|
|
| 463 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 464 |
|
|
\vspace{1cm} |
| 465 |
|
|
|
| 466 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 467 |
|
|
{\bf {\underline{Important Notes}}} |
| 468 |
|
|
|
| 469 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 470 |
|
|
{\bf 1)} heat fluxes have different signs in the ocean and ice |
| 471 |
|
|
models. |
| 472 |
|
|
|
| 473 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 474 |
|
|
{\bf 2)} {\bf StartIceModel} must be changed in {\bf data.ice}: |
| 475 |
|
|
1 (if starting from no ice), 0 (if using pickup.ic file). |
| 476 |
|
|
|
| 477 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 478 |
|
|
|
| 479 |
|
|
\vspace{1cm} |
| 480 |
|
|
|
| 481 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 482 |
|
|
{\bf {\underline{References}}} |
| 483 |
|
|
|
| 484 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 485 |
|
|
Bitz, C.M. and W.H. Lipscombe, 1999: An Energy-Conserving |
| 486 |
|
|
Thermodynamic Model of Sea Ice. |
| 487 |
|
|
{\it Journal of Geophysical Research}, 104, 15,669 -- 15,677. |
| 488 |
|
|
|
| 489 |
|
|
\vspace{.2cm} |
| 490 |
|
|
|
| 491 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 492 |
|
|
Hansen, J., G. Russell, D. Rind, P. Stone, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, |
| 493 |
|
|
R. Ruedy and L.Travis, 1983: Efficient Three-Dimensional |
| 494 |
|
|
Global Models for Climate Studies: Models I and II. |
| 495 |
|
|
{\it Monthly Weather Review}, 111, 609 -- 662. |
| 496 |
|
|
|
| 497 |
|
|
\vspace{.2cm} |
| 498 |
|
|
|
| 499 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 500 |
|
|
Hunke, E.C and W.H. Lipscomb, circa 2001: CICE: the Los Alamos |
| 501 |
|
|
Sea Ice Model Documentation and Software User's Manual. |
| 502 |
|
|
LACC-98-16v.2.\\ |
| 503 |
|
|
(note: this documentation is no longer available as CICE has progressed |
| 504 |
|
|
to a very different version 3) |
| 505 |
|
|
|
| 506 |
|
|
|
| 507 |
|
|
\vspace{.2cm} |
| 508 |
|
|
|
| 509 |
|
|
\noindent |
| 510 |
|
|
Winton, M, 2000: A reformulated Three-layer Sea Ice Model. |
| 511 |
|
|
{\it Journal of Atmospheric and Ocean Technology}, 17, 525 -- 531. |
| 512 |
|
|
|
| 513 |
|
|
|
| 514 |
|
|
|
| 515 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
| 516 |
|
|
% \end{document} |