6 |
|
|
7 |
\subsection{Introduction} |
\subsection{Introduction} |
8 |
|
|
9 |
|
\noindent |
10 |
This section of the documentation describes the Diagnostics package available within |
This section of the documentation describes the Diagnostics package available within |
11 |
the GCM. In addition to a description of how to set and extract diagnostic quantities, |
the GCM. A large selection of model diagnostics is available for output. |
12 |
this document also provides a comprehensive list of all available diagnostic quantities |
In addition to the diagnostic quantities pre-defined in the GCM, there exists |
13 |
and a short description of how they are computed. It should be noted that this document |
the option, in any experiment, to define a new diagnostic quantity and include it |
14 |
is not intended to be a complete documentation of the various packages used in the GCM, |
as part of the diagnostic output with the addition of a single subroutine call in the |
15 |
and the reader should refer to original publications and the appropriate sections of this |
routine where the field is computed. As a matter of philosophy, no diagnostic is enabled |
16 |
documentation for further insight. |
as default, thus each user must specify the exact diagnostic information required for an |
17 |
|
experiment. This is accomplished by enabling the specific diagnostic of interest cataloged |
18 |
|
in the Diagnostic Menu (see Section \ref{sec:diagnostics:menu}). Instructions for enabling |
19 |
|
diagnostic output and defining new diagnostic quantities are found in Section |
20 |
|
\ref{sec:diagnostics:usersguide} of this document. |
21 |
|
|
22 |
|
\noindent |
23 |
|
The Diagnostic Menu in this section of the manual is a listing of diagnostic quantities available |
24 |
|
within the main (dynamics) part of the GCM. Additional diagnostic quantities, defined within the |
25 |
|
different GCM packages, are available and are listed in the diagnostic menu subsection of |
26 |
|
the manual section associated with each relevant package. Once a diagnostic is enabled, the |
27 |
|
GCM will continually increment an array specifically allocated for that diagnostic whenever the |
28 |
|
appropriate quantity is computed. A counter is defined which records how many times each diagnostic |
29 |
|
quantity has been incremented. Several special diagnostics are included in the menu. Quantities |
30 |
|
refered to as ``Counter Diagnostics'', are defined for selected diagnostics which record the |
31 |
|
frequency at which a diagnostic is incremented separately for each model grid location. |
32 |
|
Quantitied refered to as ``User Diagnostics'' are included in the menu to facilitate |
33 |
|
defining new diagnostics for a particular experiment. |
34 |
|
|
35 |
\subsection{Equations} |
\subsection{Equations} |
36 |
Not relevant. |
Not relevant. |
38 |
\subsection{Key Subroutines and Parameters} |
\subsection{Key Subroutines and Parameters} |
39 |
\label{sec:diagnostics:diagover} |
\label{sec:diagnostics:diagover} |
40 |
|
|
41 |
A large selection of model diagnostics is available in the GCM. At the time of |
\noindent |
42 |
this writing there are 280 different diagnostic quantities which can be enabled for an |
There are several utilities within the GCM available to users to enable, disable, |
43 |
experiment. As a matter of philosophy, no diagnostic is enabled as default, thus each |
clear, write and retrieve model diagnostics, and may be called from any routine. |
44 |
user must specify the exact diagnostic information required for an experiment. This |
The available utilities and the CALL sequences are listed below. |
45 |
is accomplished by enabling the specific diagnostic of interest cataloged in the |
|
46 |
Diagnostic Menu (see Section \ref{sec:diagnostics:menu}). |
\noindent |
47 |
The Diagnostic Menu is a hard-wired enumeration of diagnostic quantities available within |
{\bf diagnostics\_fill}: This is the main user interface routine to the diagnostics |
48 |
the GCM. Diagnostics are internally referred to by their associated number in the Diagnostic |
package. This routine will increment the specified diagnostic quantity with a field |
49 |
Menu. Once a diagnostic is enabled, the GCM will continually increment an array |
sent through the argument list. |
50 |
specifically allocated for that diagnostic whenever the associated process for the |
|
51 |
diagnostic is computed. Separate arrays are used both for the diagnostic quantity and |
\noindent |
52 |
its diagnostic counter which records how many times each diagnostic quantity has been |
\begin{tabbing} |
53 |
computed. In addition special diagnostics, called ``Counter Diagnostics'', records the |
XXXXXXXXX\=XXXXXX\= \kill |
54 |
frequency of diagnostic updates separately for each model grid location. |
\> call diagnostics\_fill (arrayin, chardiag, levflg, nlevs, \\ |
55 |
|
\> bibjflg, bi, bj, myThid) \\ |
56 |
The diagnostics are computed at various times and places within the GCM. |
\\ |
57 |
Some diagnostics are computed on the A-grid (such as those within the fizhi routines), |
where \> arrayin \>= Field to increment diagnostics array \\ |
58 |
while others are computed on the C-grid (those computed during the dynamics time-stepping). |
\> chardiag \>= Character *8 expression for diag to fill \\ |
59 |
Some diagnostics are scalars, while others are vectors. Each of these possibilities requires |
\> levflg \>= Integer flag for vertical levels: \\ |
60 |
separate tasks for A-grid to C-grid transformations and coordinate transformations. Due |
\> \>= 0 indicates multiple (nlevs) levels incremented \\ |
61 |
to this complexity, and since the specific diagnostics enabled are User determined at the |
\> \>= -1 indicates multiple (nlevs) levels incremented, \\ |
62 |
time of the run, |
\> \> but in reverse vertical order \\ |
63 |
a diagnostic parameter has been developed and implemented into the GCM, defined as GDIAG, |
\> \> positive integer - WHICH single level to increment. \\ |
64 |
which contains information concerning various grid attributes of each diagnostic. The GDIAG |
\> nlevs \>= indicates Number of levels to be filled (1 if levflg gt 0) \\ |
65 |
array is internally defined as a character*8 variable, and is equivalenced to |
\> bibjflg \>= Integer flag to indicate instructions for bi bj loop \\ |
66 |
a character*1 "parse" array in output in order to extract the grid-attribute information. |
\> \>= 0 indicates that the bi-bj loop must be done here \\ |
67 |
The GDIAG array is described in Table \ref{tab:diagnostics:gdiag.tabl}. |
\> \>= 1 indicates that the bi-bj loop is done OUTSIDE \\ |
68 |
|
\> \>= 2 indicates that the bi-bj loop is done OUTSIDE \\ |
69 |
|
\> \> AND that we have been sent a local array \\ |
70 |
|
\> \> AND that the array has the shadow regions \\ |
71 |
|
\> \>= 3 indicates that the bi-bj loop is done OUTSIDE \\ |
72 |
|
\> \> AND that we have been sent a local array \\ |
73 |
|
\> \> AND that the array has no shadow regions \\ |
74 |
|
\> bi \>= X-direction process(or) number - used for bibjflg=1-3 \\ |
75 |
|
\> bj \>= Y-direction process(or) number - used for bibjflg=1-3 \\ |
76 |
|
\> myThid \>= Current Thread number \\ |
77 |
|
\end{tabbing} |
78 |
|
|
79 |
|
\noindent |
80 |
|
{\bf diagnostics\_scale\_fill}: This is a possible alternative routine to |
81 |
|
diagnostics\_fill which performs the same functions and has an additional option |
82 |
|
to scale the field before filling or raise the field to a power before filling. |
83 |
|
|
84 |
|
\noindent |
85 |
|
\begin{tabbing} |
86 |
|
XXXXXXXXX\=XXXXXX\= \kill |
87 |
|
\> call diagnostics\_scale\_fill (arrayin, scalefactor, power, chardiag, \\ |
88 |
|
\> levflg, nlevs, bibjflg, bi, bj, myThid) \\ |
89 |
|
\\ |
90 |
|
where \> All the arguments are the same as for diagnostics\_fill with the addition of: \\ |
91 |
|
\> scalefactor \>= Factor to scale field \\ |
92 |
|
\> power \>= Integer power to which to raise the input field \\ |
93 |
|
\end{tabbing} |
94 |
|
|
95 |
|
\noindent |
96 |
|
{\bf diagnostics\_is\_on}: Function call to inquire whether a diagnostic is active |
97 |
|
and can be incremented. Useful when there is a computation that must be done locally |
98 |
|
before a call to diagnostics\_fill. The call sequence: |
99 |
|
|
100 |
|
\noindent |
101 |
|
\begin{tabbing} |
102 |
|
XXXXXXXXX\=XXXXXX\= \kill |
103 |
|
\> flag = diagnostics\_is\_on( diagName, myThid ) |
104 |
|
\\ |
105 |
|
where \> diagName \>= Character *8 expression for diagnostic \\ |
106 |
|
\> myThid \>= Current Thread number \\ |
107 |
|
\end{tabbing} |
108 |
|
|
109 |
|
\noindent |
110 |
|
{\bf diagnostics\_get\_pointers}: This subroutine retrieves the value of a the diagnostics |
111 |
|
pointers that other routines require as input - can be useful if the diagnostics common |
112 |
|
blocks are not local to a routine. |
113 |
|
|
114 |
|
\noindent |
115 |
|
\begin{tabbing} |
116 |
|
XXXXXXXXX\=XXXXXX\= \kill |
117 |
|
\> call diagnostics\_get\_pointers( diagName, ipoint, jpoint, myThid ) |
118 |
|
\\ |
119 |
|
where \> diagName \>= Character *8 expression of diagnostic \\ |
120 |
|
\> ipoint \>= Pointer into qdiag array - from idiag array in common \\ |
121 |
|
\> jpoint \>= Pointer into diagnostics menu - from jdiag array in common \\ |
122 |
|
\> myThid \>= Current Thread number \\ |
123 |
|
\end{tabbing} |
124 |
|
|
125 |
|
\noindent |
126 |
|
{\bf getdiag}: This subroutine retrieves the value of a model diagnostic. This routine |
127 |
|
is particulary useful when called from a user output routine, although it can be called |
128 |
|
from any routine. This routine returns the time-averaged value of the diagnostic by |
129 |
|
dividing the current accumulated diagnostic value by its corresponding counter. This |
130 |
|
routine does not change the value of the diagnostic itself, that is, it does not replace |
131 |
|
the diagnostic with its time-average. The calling sequence for this routine is givin by: |
132 |
|
|
133 |
|
\noindent |
134 |
|
\begin{tabbing} |
135 |
|
XXXXXXXXX\=XXXXXX\= \kill |
136 |
|
\> call getdiag (lev, undef, qtmp, ipoint, mate, bi, bj, myThid) \\ |
137 |
|
\\ |
138 |
|
where \> lev \>= Model Level at which the diagnostic is desired \\ |
139 |
|
\> undef \>= Fill value to be used when diagnostic is undefined \\ |
140 |
|
\> qtmp \>= Time-Averaged Diagnostic Output \\ |
141 |
|
\> ipoint \>= Pointer into qdiag array - from idiag array in common \\ |
142 |
|
\> mate \>= Diagnostic mate pointer number \\ |
143 |
|
\> bi \>= X-direction process(or) number \\ |
144 |
|
\> bj \>= Y-direction process(or) number \\ |
145 |
|
\> myThid \>= Current Thread number \\ |
146 |
|
\end{tabbing} |
147 |
|
|
148 |
|
\noindent |
149 |
|
{\bf diagnostics\_add2list}: This subroutine enables a diagnostic from the Diagnostic Menu, meaning |
150 |
|
that space is allocated for the diagnostic and the model routines will increment the |
151 |
|
diagnostic value during execution. This routine is the underlying interface routine |
152 |
|
for defining a new permanent diagnostic in the main model or in a package. The calling sequence is: |
153 |
|
|
154 |
|
\noindent |
155 |
|
\begin{tabbing} |
156 |
|
XXXXXXXXX\=XXXXXX\= \kill |
157 |
|
\> call diagnostics\_add2list( diagNum,diagName, diagCode, \\ |
158 |
|
\> diagUnits, diagTitle, myThid ) \\ |
159 |
|
\\ |
160 |
|
where \> diagNum \>=Diagnostic number - Output from routine \\ |
161 |
|
\> diagName \>=character*8 diagnostic name \\ |
162 |
|
\> diagCode \>=character*16 parsing code (see description of gdiag below) \\ |
163 |
|
\> diagUnits \>=Diagnostic units (character*16) \\ |
164 |
|
\> diagTitle \>=Diagnostic title or long name (up to character*80) \\ |
165 |
|
\> myThid \>=Current Thread number \\ |
166 |
|
\end{tabbing} |
167 |
|
|
168 |
|
\noindent |
169 |
|
{\bf clrdiag}: This subroutine initializes the values of model diagnostics to zero, and is |
170 |
|
particularly useful when called from user output routines to re-initialize diagnostics |
171 |
|
during the run. The calling sequence is: |
172 |
|
|
173 |
|
\noindent |
174 |
|
\begin{tabbing} |
175 |
|
XXXXXXXXX\=XXXXXX\= \kill |
176 |
|
\> call diagnostics\_clrdiag (jpoint, ipoint, myThid) \\ |
177 |
|
\\ |
178 |
|
where \> jpoint \>= Diagnostic number from menu - from jdiag array \\ |
179 |
|
ipoint \>= Pointer number into qdiag array - from idiag array \\ |
180 |
|
\> myThid \>=Current Thread number \\ |
181 |
|
\end{tabbing} |
182 |
|
|
183 |
|
\noindent |
184 |
|
The diagnostics are computed at various times and places within the GCM. Because the |
185 |
|
MIT GCM may employ a staggered grid, diagnostics may be computed at grid box centers, |
186 |
|
corners, or edges, and at the middle or edge in the vertical. Some diagnostics are scalars, |
187 |
|
while others are components of vectors. An internal array is defined which contains |
188 |
|
information concerning various grid attributes of each diagnostic. The GDIAG |
189 |
|
array (in common block \\diagnostics in file diagnostics.h) is internally defined as a |
190 |
|
character*8 variable, and is equivalenced to a character*1 "parse" array in output in |
191 |
|
order to extract the grid-attribute information. The GDIAG array is described in |
192 |
|
Table \ref{tab:diagnostics:gdiag.tabl}. |
193 |
|
|
194 |
\begin{table} |
\begin{table} |
195 |
\caption{Diagnostic Parsing Array} |
\caption{Diagnostic Parsing Array} |
220 |
\end{center} |
\end{center} |
221 |
\end{table} |
\end{table} |
222 |
|
|
223 |
|
|
224 |
|
\noindent |
225 |
As an example, consider a diagnostic whose associated GDIAG parameter is equal |
As an example, consider a diagnostic whose associated GDIAG parameter is equal |
226 |
to ``UU 002''. From GDIAG we can determine that this diagnostic is a |
to ``UU 002''. From GDIAG we can determine that this diagnostic is a |
227 |
U-vector component located at the C-grid U-point. |
U-vector component located at the C-grid U-point. |
228 |
Its corresponding V-component diagnostic is located in Diagnostic \# 002. |
Its corresponding V-component diagnostic is located in Diagnostic \# 002. |
229 |
|
|
230 |
|
\noindent |
231 |
In this way, each Diagnostic in the model has its attributes (ie. vector or scalar, |
In this way, each Diagnostic in the model has its attributes (ie. vector or scalar, |
232 |
A-Grid or C-grid, etc.) defined internally. The Output routines |
C-grid location, etc.) defined internally. The Output routines use this information |
233 |
use this information in order to determine |
in order to determine what type of transformations need to be performed. Any |
234 |
what type of transformations need to be performed. Thus, all Diagnostic |
interpolations are done at the time of output rather than during each model step. |
235 |
interpolations are done at the time of output rather than during each model dynamic step. |
In this way the User has flexibility in determining the type of gridded data which |
236 |
In this way the User now has more flexibility |
is output. |
|
in determining the type of gridded data which is output. |
|
|
|
|
|
There are several utilities within the GCM available to users to enable, disable, |
|
|
clear, write and retrieve model diagnostics, and may be called from any routine. |
|
|
The available utilities and the CALL sequences are listed below. |
|
237 |
|
|
238 |
{\bf fill\_diag}: This routine will increment |
\subsection{Usage Notes} |
239 |
|
\label{sec:diagnostics:usersguide} |
|
{\bf setdiag}: This subroutine enables a diagnostic from the Diagnostic Menu, meaning |
|
|
that space is allocated for the diagnostic and the model routines will increment the |
|
|
diagnostic value during execution. This routine is the underlying interface |
|
|
between the user and the desired diagnostic. The diagnostic is referenced by its diagnostic |
|
|
number from the menu, and its calling sequence is given by: |
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{tabbing} |
|
|
XXXXXXXXX\=XXXXXX\= \kill |
|
|
\> call setdiag (num) \\ |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
where \> num \>= Diagnostic number from menu \\ |
|
|
\end{tabbing} |
|
240 |
|
|
241 |
{\bf getdiag}: This subroutine retrieves the value of a model diagnostic. This routine |
\noindent |
242 |
is particulary useful when called from a user output routine, although it can be called |
To use the diagnostics package, other than enabling it in packages.conf |
243 |
from any routine. This routine returns the time-averaged value of the diagnostic by |
and turning the usediagnostics flag in data.pkg to .TRUE., there are two |
244 |
dividing the current accumulated diagnostic value by its corresponding counter. This |
further steps the user must take to enable the diagnostics package for |
245 |
routine does not change the value of the diagnostic itself, that is, it does not replace |
output of quantities that are already defined in the GCM under an experiment's |
246 |
the diagnostic with its time-average. The calling sequence for this routine is givin by: |
configuration of packages. A namelist must be supplied in the run directory |
247 |
|
called data.diagnostics, and the file DIAGNOSTICS\_SIZE.h must be included in the |
248 |
|
code directory. The steps for defining a new (permanent or experiment-specific |
249 |
|
temporary) diagnostic quantity will be outlined later. |
250 |
|
|
251 |
|
\noindent The namelist will activate a user-defined list of diagnostics quantities |
252 |
|
to be computed, specify the frequency and type of output, the number of levels, and |
253 |
|
the name of all the separate output files. A sample data.diagnostics namelist file: |
254 |
|
|
255 |
|
\noindent |
256 |
|
$\#$ Diagnostic Package Choices \\ |
257 |
|
$\&$diagnostics\_list \\ |
258 |
|
frequency(1) = 86400., \ \\ |
259 |
|
levels(1,1) = 1., \ \\ |
260 |
|
fields(1,1) = 'RSURF ', \ \\ |
261 |
|
filename(1) = 'surface', \ \\ |
262 |
|
frequency(2) = 86400., \ \\ |
263 |
|
levels(1,2) = 1.,2.,3.,4.,5., \ \\ |
264 |
|
fields(1,2) = 'UVEL ','VVEL ', \ \\ |
265 |
|
filename(2) = 'diagout1', \ \\ |
266 |
|
frequency(3) = 3600., \ \\ |
267 |
|
fields(1,3) = 'UVEL ','VVEL ','PRESSURE', \ \\ |
268 |
|
filename(3) = 'diagout2', \ \\ |
269 |
|
fileflags(3) = ' P1 ', \ \\ |
270 |
|
$\&$end \ \\ |
271 |
|
|
272 |
\begin{tabbing} |
\noindent |
273 |
XXXXXXXXX\=XXXXXX\= \kill |
In this example, there are two output files that will be generated |
274 |
\> call getdiag (lev,num,qtmp,undef) \\ |
for each tile and for each output time. The first set of output files |
275 |
\\ |
has the prefix diagout1, does time averaging every 86400. seconds, |
276 |
where \> lev \>= Model Level at which the diagnostic is desired \\ |
(frequency is 86400.), and will write fields which are multiple-level |
277 |
\> num \>= Diagnostic number from menu \\ |
fields at output levels 1-5. The names of diagnostics quantities are |
278 |
\> qtmp \>= Time-Averaged Diagnostic Output \\ |
UVEL and VVEL. The second set of output files |
279 |
\> undef \>= Fill value to be used when diagnostic is undefined \\ |
has the prefix diagout2, does time averaging every 3600. seconds, |
280 |
\end{tabbing} |
includes fields which are multiple-level fields, levels output are 1-5, |
281 |
|
and the names of diagnostics quantities are THETA and SALT. |
282 |
|
|
283 |
{\bf clrdiag}: This subroutine initializes the values of model diagnostics to zero, and is |
\noindent |
284 |
particularly useful when called from user output routines to re-initialize diagnostics |
The user must assure that enough computer memory is allocated for the diagnostics |
285 |
during the run. The calling sequence is: |
and the output streams selected for a particular experiment. This is acomplished by |
286 |
|
modifying the file DIAGNOSTICS\_SIZE.h and including it in the experiment code directory. |
287 |
|
The parameters that should be checked are called numdiags, numlists, numperlist, and |
288 |
|
diagSt\_size. |
289 |
|
|
290 |
|
\noindent numdiags (and diagSt\_size): \\ |
291 |
|
\noindent All GCM diagnostic quantities are stored in the single diagnostic array QDIAG |
292 |
|
which is located in the file \\ \filelink{pkg/diagnostics/diagnostics.h}{pkg-diagnostics-diagnostics.h}.\\ |
293 |
|
and has the form:\\ |
294 |
|
common /diagnostics/ qdiag(1-Olx,sNx+Olx,1-Olx,sNx+Olx,numdiags,Nsx,Nsy) \\ |
295 |
|
\noindent |
296 |
|
The first two-dimensions of qdiag correspond to the horizontal dimension of a given diagnostic, |
297 |
|
and the third dimension of qdiag is used to identify diagnostic fields and levels combined. In |
298 |
|
order to minimize the memory requirement of the model for diagnostics, the default GCM |
299 |
|
executable is compiled with room for only one horizontal diagnostic array, or with |
300 |
|
numdiags set to Nr. In order for the User to enable more than 1 three-dimensional diagnostic, |
301 |
|
the size of the diagnostics common must be expanded to accomodate the desired diagnostics. |
302 |
|
This can be accomplished by manually changing the parameter numdiags in the |
303 |
|
file \filelink{pkg/diagnostics/DIAGNOSTICS\_SIZE.h}{pkg-diagnostics-DIAGNOSTICS\_SIZE.h}. |
304 |
|
numdiags should be set greater than or equal to the sum of all the diagnostics activated |
305 |
|
for output each multiplied by the number of levels defined for that diagnostic quantity. |
306 |
|
For the above example, there are 4 multiple level fields, which the diagnostics menu |
307 |
|
(see below) indicates are defined at the GCM vertical resolution, Nr. The value of |
308 |
|
numdiag in DIAGNOSTICS\_SIZE.h would therefore be equal to 4*Nr, or, say 40 if $Nr=10$. |
309 |
|
|
310 |
|
\noindent numlists and numperlist: \\ |
311 |
|
\noindent The parameter numlists must be set greater than or equal to the number of |
312 |
|
separate output streams that the user specifies in the namelist file data.diagnostics. |
313 |
|
The parameter numperlist corresponds to the number of diagnostics requested in each |
314 |
|
output stream. |
315 |
|
|
316 |
|
\noindent |
317 |
|
In order to define and include as part of the diagnostic output any field |
318 |
|
that is desired for a particular experiment, two steps must be taken. The |
319 |
|
first is to enable the ``User Diagnostic'' in data.diagnostics. This is |
320 |
|
accomplished by adding one of the ``User Diagnostic'' field names (UDIAG1 through |
321 |
|
UDIAG10, for multi-level fields, or SDIAG1 through SDIAG10 for single level |
322 |
|
fields) to the data.diagnostics namelist in one of the output streams. These |
323 |
|
fields are listed in the diagnostics menu. The second step is to |
324 |
|
add a call to diagnostics\_fill from the subroutine in which the quantity |
325 |
|
desired for diagnostic output is computed. |
326 |
|
|
327 |
|
\noindent |
328 |
|
In order to add a new diagnostic to the permanent set of diagnostics that the |
329 |
|
main model or any package contains as part of its diagnostics menu, the subroutine |
330 |
|
diagnostics\_add2list should be called during the initialization phase of the |
331 |
|
main model or package. For the main model, the call should be made from |
332 |
|
subroutine diagnostics\_main\_init, and for a package, the call should probably |
333 |
|
be made from somewhere in the packages\_init\_fixed sequence (probaby from inside |
334 |
|
the particular package's init\_fixed routine). A typical code sequence to set the |
335 |
|
input arguments to diagnostics\_add2list would look like: |
336 |
|
|
337 |
|
\noindent |
338 |
\begin{tabbing} |
\begin{tabbing} |
339 |
XXXXXXXXX\=XXXXXX\= \kill |
XXXXXXXXX\=XXXXXX\= \kill |
340 |
\> call clrdiag (num) \\ |
\> diagName = 'THETA ' \\ |
341 |
|
\> diagTitle = 'Potential Temperature (degC,K)' \\ |
342 |
|
\> diagUnits = 'Degrees K ' \\ |
343 |
|
\> diagCode = 'SM MR ' \\ |
344 |
|
\> CALL DIAGNOSTICS\_ADD2LIST( diagNum, \\ |
345 |
|
\> I diagName, diagCode, diagUnits, diagTitle, myThid ) \\ |
346 |
\\ |
\\ |
|
where \> num \>= Diagnostic number from menu \\ |
|
347 |
\end{tabbing} |
\end{tabbing} |
348 |
|
|
349 |
{\bf zapdiag}: This entry into subroutine SETDIAG disables model diagnostics, meaning |
\noindent If the new diagnostic quantity is associated with either a vector |
350 |
that the diagnostic is no longer available to the user. The memory previously allocated |
pair or a diagnostic counter, the diagCode argument must be filled with the |
351 |
to the diagnostic is released when ZAPDIAG is invoked. The calling sequence is given by: |
proper index for the ``mate''. The output argument from diagnostics\_add2list |
352 |
|
that is called diagNum here contains a running total of the number of diagnostics |
353 |
|
defined in the code up to any point during the run. The sequence number for the |
354 |
|
next two diagnostics defined (the two components of the vector pair, for instance) |
355 |
|
will be diagNum+1 and diagNum+2. The definition of the first component of the vector |
356 |
|
pair must fill the ``mate'' segment of the diagCode as diagnostic number diagNum+2. |
357 |
|
Since the subroutine increments diagNum, the definition of the second component of |
358 |
|
the vector fills the ``mate'' part of diagCode with diagNum. A code sequence for |
359 |
|
this case would look like: |
360 |
|
|
361 |
|
\noindent |
362 |
\begin{tabbing} |
\begin{tabbing} |
363 |
XXXXXXXXX\=XXXXXX\= \kill |
XXXXXXXXX\=XXXXXX\= \kill |
364 |
\> call zapdiag (NUM) \\ |
\> diagName = 'UVEL ' \\ |
365 |
|
\> diagTitle = 'Zonal Velocity ' \\ |
366 |
|
\> diagUnits = 'm / sec ' \\ |
367 |
|
\> diagCode = 'SM MR ' \\ |
368 |
|
\> write(diagCode,'(A,I3.3,A)') 'VV ', diagNum+2 ,'MR ' \\ |
369 |
|
\> call diagnostics\_add2list( diagNum, \\ |
370 |
|
\> I diagName, diagCode, diagUnits, diagTitle, myThid ) \\ |
371 |
|
\> diagName = 'VVEL ' \\ |
372 |
|
\> diagTitle = 'Meridional Velocity ' \\ |
373 |
|
\> diagUnits = 'm / sec ' \\ |
374 |
|
\> diagCode = 'SM MR ' \\ |
375 |
|
\> write(diagCode,'(A,I3.3,A)') 'VV ', diagNum ,'MR ' \\ |
376 |
|
\> call diagnostics\_add2list( diagNum, \\ |
377 |
|
\> I diagName, diagCode, diagUnits, diagTitle, myThid ) \\ |
378 |
\\ |
\\ |
|
where \> num \>= Diagnostic number from menu \\ |
|
379 |
\end{tabbing} |
\end{tabbing} |
380 |
|
|
|
{\bf diagsize}: We end this section with a discussion on the manner in which computer |
|
|
memory is allocated for diagnostics. All GCM diagnostic quantities are stored in the |
|
|
single diagnostic array QDIAG which is located in diagnostics.h, and has the form: |
|
|
|
|
|
common /diagnostics/ qdiag(1-Olx,sNx+Olx,1-Olx,sNx+Olx,numdiags,Nsx,Nsy) |
|
|
|
|
|
where numdiags is an Integer variable which should be |
|
|
set equal to the number of enabled diagnostics, and qdiag is a three-dimensional |
|
|
array. The first two-dimensions of qdiag correspond to the horizontal dimension |
|
|
of a given diagnostic, while the third dimension of qdiag is used to identify |
|
|
specific diagnostic types. |
|
|
In order to minimize the memory requirement of the model for diagnostics, |
|
|
the default GCM executable is compiled with room for only one horizontal |
|
|
diagnostic array, as shown in the above example. |
|
|
In order for the User to enable more than 1 two-dimensional diagnostic, |
|
|
the size of the diagnostics common must be expanded to accomodate the desired diagnostics. |
|
|
This can be accomplished by manually changing the parameter numdiags in the |
|
|
file \filelink{pkg/diagnostics/diagnostics\_SIZE.h}{pkg-diagnostics-diagnostics_SIZE.h}, or by allowing the |
|
|
shell script (???????) to make this |
|
|
change based on the choice of diagnostic output made in the namelist. |
|
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Usage Notes} |
|
|
\label{sec:diagnostics:usersguide} |
|
|
To use the diagnostics package, other than enabling it in packages.conf |
|
|
and turning the usediagnostics flag in data.pkg to .TRUE., a namelist |
|
|
must be supplied in the run directory called data.diagnostics. The namelist |
|
|
will activate a user-defined list of diagnostics quantities to be computed, |
|
|
specify the frequency of output, the number of levels, and the name of |
|
|
up to 10 separate output files. A sample data.diagnostics namelist file: |
|
|
|
|
|
<<<<<<< diagnostics.tex |
|
|
$\#$ Diagnostic Package Choices |
|
|
$\&$diagnostics\_list |
|
|
======= |
|
|
\begin{verbatim} |
|
|
\# Diagnostic Package Choices |
|
|
\&diagnostics_list |
|
|
>>>>>>> 1.4 |
|
|
frequency(1) = 10, \ |
|
|
levels(1,1) = 1.,2.,3.,4.,5., \ |
|
|
fields(1,1) = 'UVEL ','VVEL ', \ |
|
|
filename(1) = 'diagout1', \ |
|
|
frequency(2) = 100, \ |
|
|
levels(1,2) = 1.,2.,3.,4.,5., \ |
|
|
fields(1,2) = 'THETA ','SALT ', \ |
|
|
filename(2) = 'diagout2', \ |
|
|
<<<<<<< diagnostics.tex |
|
|
$\&$end \ |
|
|
======= |
|
|
\&end \ |
|
|
\end{verbatim} |
|
|
>>>>>>> 1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
In this example, there are two output files that will be generated |
|
|
for each tile and for each output time. The first set of output files |
|
|
has the prefix diagout1, does time averaging every 10 time steps, |
|
|
for fields which are multiple-level fields the levels output are 1-5, |
|
|
and the names of diagnostics quantities are UVEL and VVEL. |
|
|
The second set of output files |
|
|
has the prefix diagout2, does time averaging every 100 time steps, |
|
|
for fields which are multiple-level fields the levels output are 1-5, |
|
|
and the names of diagnostics quantities are THETA and SALT. |
|
381 |
|
|
382 |
\newpage |
\newpage |
383 |
|
|
384 |
\subsubsection{GCM Diagnostic Menu} |
\subsubsection{GCM Diagnostic Menu} |
385 |
\label{sec:diagnostics:menu} |
\label{sec:diagnostics:menu} |
386 |
|
|
387 |
\begin{tabular}{lllll} |
\begin{tabular}{llll} |
388 |
\hline\hline |
\hline\hline |
389 |
N & NAME & UNITS & LEVELS & DESCRIPTION \\ |
NAME & UNITS & LEVELS & DESCRIPTION \\ |
390 |
\hline |
\hline |
391 |
|
|
392 |
&\\ |
&\\ |
393 |
1 & UFLUX & $Newton/m^2$ & 1 |
SDIAG1 & & 1 |
|
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
|
|
{Surface U-Wind Stress on the atmosphere} |
|
|
\end{minipage}\\ |
|
|
2 & VFLUX & $Newton/m^2$ & 1 |
|
|
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
|
|
{Surface V-Wind Stress on the atmosphere} |
|
|
\end{minipage}\\ |
|
|
3 & HFLUX & $Watts/m^2$ & 1 |
|
394 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
395 |
{Surface Flux of Sensible Heat} |
{User-Defined Surface Diagnostic-1} |
396 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
397 |
4 & EFLUX & $Watts/m^2$ & 1 |
SDIAG2 & & 1 |
398 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
399 |
{Surface Flux of Latent Heat} |
{User-Defined Surface Diagnostic-2} |
400 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
401 |
5 & QICE & $Watts/m^2$ & 1 |
UDIAG1 & & Nrphys |
402 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
403 |
{Heat Conduction through Sea-Ice} |
{User-Defined Upper-Air Diagnostic-1} |
404 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
405 |
6 & RADLWG & $Watts/m^2$ & 1 |
UDIAG2 & & Nrphys |
406 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
407 |
{Net upward LW flux at the ground} |
{User-Defined Upper-Air Diagnostic-2} |
408 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
409 |
7 & RADSWG & $Watts/m^2$ & 1 |
SDIAG3 & & 1 |
410 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
411 |
{Net downward SW flux at the ground} |
{User-Defined Surface Diagnostic-3} |
412 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
413 |
8 & RI & $dimensionless$ & Nrphys |
SDIAG4 & & 1 |
414 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
415 |
{Richardson Number} |
{User-Defined Surface Diagnostic-4} |
416 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
417 |
9 & CT & $dimensionless$ & 1 |
SDIAG5 & & 1 |
418 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
419 |
{Surface Drag coefficient for T and Q} |
{User-Defined Surface Diagnostic-5} |
420 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
421 |
10 & CU & $dimensionless$ & 1 |
SDIAG6 & & 1 |
422 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
423 |
{Surface Drag coefficient for U and V} |
{User-Defined Surface Diagnostic-6} |
424 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
425 |
11 & ET & $m^2/sec$ & Nrphys |
SDIAG7 & & 1 |
426 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
427 |
{Diffusivity coefficient for T and Q} |
{User-Defined Surface Diagnostic-7} |
428 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
429 |
12 & EU & $m^2/sec$ & Nrphys |
SDIAG8 & & 1 |
430 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
431 |
{Diffusivity coefficient for U and V} |
{User-Defined Surface Diagnostic-8} |
432 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
433 |
13 & TURBU & $m/sec/day$ & Nrphys |
SDIAG9 & & 1 |
434 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
435 |
{U-Momentum Changes due to Turbulence} |
{User-Defined Surface Diagnostic-9} |
436 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
437 |
14 & TURBV & $m/sec/day$ & Nrphys |
SDIAG10 & & 1 |
438 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
439 |
{V-Momentum Changes due to Turbulence} |
{User-Defined Surface Diagnostic-1-} |
440 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
441 |
15 & TURBT & $deg/day$ & Nrphys |
UDIAG3 & & Nrphys |
442 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
443 |
{Temperature Changes due to Turbulence} |
{User-Defined Multi-Level Diagnostic-3} |
444 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
445 |
16 & TURBQ & $g/kg/day$ & Nrphys |
UDIAG4 & & Nrphys |
446 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
447 |
{Specific Humidity Changes due to Turbulence} |
{User-Defined Multi-Level Diagnostic-4} |
448 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
449 |
17 & MOISTT & $deg/day$ & Nrphys |
UDIAG5 & & Nrphys |
450 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
451 |
{Temperature Changes due to Moist Processes} |
{User-Defined Multi-Level Diagnostic-5} |
452 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
453 |
18 & MOISTQ & $g/kg/day$ & Nrphys |
UDIAG6 & & Nrphys |
454 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
455 |
{Specific Humidity Changes due to Moist Processes} |
{User-Defined Multi-Level Diagnostic-6} |
456 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
457 |
19 & RADLW & $deg/day$ & Nrphys |
UDIAG7 & & Nrphys |
458 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
459 |
{Net Longwave heating rate for each level} |
{User-Defined Multi-Level Diagnostic-7} |
460 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
461 |
20 & RADSW & $deg/day$ & Nrphys |
UDIAG8 & & Nrphys |
462 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
463 |
{Net Shortwave heating rate for each level} |
{User-Defined Multi-Level Diagnostic-8} |
464 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
465 |
21 & PREACC & $mm/day$ & 1 |
UDIAG9 & & Nrphys |
466 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
467 |
{Total Precipitation} |
{User-Defined Multi-Level Diagnostic-9} |
468 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
469 |
22 & PRECON & $mm/day$ & 1 |
UDIAG10 & & Nrphys |
470 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
471 |
{Convective Precipitation} |
{User-Defined Multi-Level Diagnostic-10} |
472 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
473 |
23 & TUFLUX & $Newton/m^2$ & Nrphys |
SDIAGC & & 1 |
474 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
475 |
{Turbulent Flux of U-Momentum} |
{User-Defined Counted Surface Diagnostic} |
476 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
477 |
24 & TVFLUX & $Newton/m^2$ & Nrphys |
SDIAGCC & & 1 |
478 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
479 |
{Turbulent Flux of V-Momentum} |
{User-Defined Counted Surface Diagnostic Counter} |
480 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
481 |
25 & TTFLUX & $Watts/m^2$ & Nrphys |
ETAN & $(hPa,m)$ & 1 |
482 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
483 |
{Turbulent Flux of Sensible Heat} |
{Perturbation of Surface (pressure, height)} |
484 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
485 |
26 & TQFLUX & $Watts/m^2$ & Nrphys |
ETANSQ & $(hPa^2,m^2)$ & 1 |
486 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
487 |
{Turbulent Flux of Latent Heat} |
{Square of Perturbation of Surface (pressure, height)} |
488 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
489 |
27 & CN & $dimensionless$ & 1 |
DETADT2 & ${r-unit}^2/s^2$ & 1 |
490 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
491 |
{Neutral Drag Coefficient} |
{Square of Eta (Surf.P,SSH) Tendency} |
492 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
493 |
28 & WINDS & $m/sec$ & 1 |
THETA & $deg K$ & Nr |
494 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
495 |
{Surface Wind Speed} |
{Potential Temperature} |
496 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
497 |
29 & DTSRF & $deg$ & 1 |
SST & $deg K$ & 1 |
498 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
499 |
{Air/Surface virtual temperature difference} |
{Sea Surface Temperature} |
500 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
501 |
30 & TG & $deg$ & 1 |
SALT & $g/kg$ & Nr |
502 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
503 |
{Ground temperature} |
{Salt (or Water Vapor Mixing Ratio)} |
504 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
505 |
31 & TS & $deg$ & 1 |
SSS & $g/kg$ & 1 |
506 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
507 |
{Surface air temperature (Adiabatic from lowest model layer)} |
{Sea Surface Salinity} |
508 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
509 |
32 & DTG & $deg$ & 1 |
SALTanom & $g/kg$ & Nr |
510 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
511 |
{Ground temperature adjustment} |
{Salt anomaly (=SALT-35)} |
512 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
|
|
|
513 |
\end{tabular} |
\end{tabular} |
514 |
|
\vspace{1.5in} |
515 |
|
\vfill |
516 |
|
|
517 |
\newpage |
\newpage |
518 |
\vspace*{\fill} |
\vspace*{\fill} |
519 |
\begin{tabular}{lllll} |
\begin{tabular}{llll} |
520 |
\hline\hline |
\hline\hline |
521 |
N & NAME & UNITS & LEVELS & DESCRIPTION \\ |
NAME & UNITS & LEVELS & DESCRIPTION \\ |
522 |
\hline |
\hline |
523 |
|
|
524 |
&\\ |
&\\ |
525 |
33 & QG & $g/kg$ & 1 |
UVEL & $m/sec$ & Nr |
526 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
527 |
{Ground specific humidity} |
{U-Velocity} |
528 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
529 |
34 & QS & $g/kg$ & 1 |
VVEL & $m/sec$ & Nr |
530 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
531 |
{Saturation surface specific humidity} |
{V-Velocity} |
532 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
533 |
|
UVEL\_k2 & $m/sec$ & 1 |
|
&\\ |
|
|
35 & TGRLW & $deg$ & 1 |
|
534 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
535 |
{Instantaneous ground temperature used as input to the |
{U-Velocity} |
|
Longwave radiation subroutine} |
|
536 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
537 |
36 & ST4 & $Watts/m^2$ & 1 |
VVEL\_k2 & $m/sec$ & 1 |
538 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
539 |
{Upward Longwave flux at the ground ($\sigma T^4$)} |
{V-Velocity} |
540 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
541 |
37 & OLR & $Watts/m^2$ & 1 |
WVEL & $m/sec$ & Nr |
542 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
543 |
{Net upward Longwave flux at the top of the model} |
{Vertical-Velocity} |
544 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
545 |
38 & OLRCLR & $Watts/m^2$ & 1 |
THETASQ & $deg^2$ & Nr |
546 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
547 |
{Net upward clearsky Longwave flux at the top of the model} |
{Square of Potential Temperature} |
548 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
549 |
39 & LWGCLR & $Watts/m^2$ & 1 |
SALTSQ & $g^2/{kg}^2$ & Nr |
550 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
551 |
{Net upward clearsky Longwave flux at the ground} |
{Square of Salt (or Water Vapor Mixing Ratio)} |
552 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
553 |
40 & LWCLR & $deg/day$ & Nrphys |
SALTSQan & $g^2/{kg}^2$ & Nr |
554 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
555 |
{Net clearsky Longwave heating rate for each level} |
{Square of Salt anomaly (=SALT-35)} |
556 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
557 |
41 & TLW & $deg$ & Nrphys |
UVELSQ & $m^2/sec^2$ & Nr |
558 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
559 |
{Instantaneous temperature used as input to the Longwave radiation |
{Square of U-Velocity} |
|
subroutine} |
|
560 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
561 |
42 & SHLW & $g/g$ & Nrphys |
VVELSQ & $m^2/sec^2$ & Nr |
562 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
563 |
{Instantaneous specific humidity used as input to the Longwave radiation |
{Square of V-Velocity} |
|
subroutine} |
|
564 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
565 |
43 & OZLW & $g/g$ & Nrphys |
WVELSQ & $m^2/sec^2$ & Nr |
566 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
567 |
{Instantaneous ozone used as input to the Longwave radiation |
{Square of Vertical-Velocity} |
|
subroutine} |
|
568 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
569 |
44 & CLMOLW & $0-1$ & Nrphys |
UV\_VEL\_C & $m^2/sec^2$ & Nr |
570 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
571 |
{Maximum overlap cloud fraction used in the Longwave radiation |
{Meridional Transport of Zonal Momentum (cell center)} |
|
subroutine} |
|
572 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
573 |
45 & CLDTOT & $0-1$ & Nrphys |
UV\_VEL\_Z & $m^2/sec^2$ & Nr |
574 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
575 |
{Total cloud fraction used in the Longwave and Shortwave radiation |
{Meridional Transport of Zonal Momentum (corner)} |
|
subroutines} |
|
576 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
577 |
46 & RADSWT & $Watts/m^2$ & 1 |
WU\_VEL & $m^2/sec^2$ & Nr |
578 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
579 |
{Incident Shortwave radiation at the top of the atmosphere} |
{Vertical Transport of Zonal Momentum (cell center)} |
580 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
581 |
47 & CLROSW & $0-1$ & Nrphys |
WV\_VEL & $m^2/sec^2$ & Nr |
582 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
583 |
{Random overlap cloud fraction used in the shortwave radiation |
{Vertical Transport of Meridional Momentum (cell center)} |
|
subroutine} |
|
584 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
585 |
48 & CLMOSW & $0-1$ & Nrphys |
UVELMASS & $m/sec$ & Nr |
586 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
587 |
{Maximum overlap cloud fraction used in the shortwave radiation |
{Zonal Mass-Weighted Component of Velocity} |
|
subroutine} |
|
588 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
589 |
49 & EVAP & $mm/day$ & 1 |
VVELMASS & $m/sec$ & Nr |
590 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
591 |
{Surface evaporation} |
{Meridional Mass-Weighted Component of Velocity} |
592 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
593 |
\end{tabular} |
WVELMASS & $m/sec$ & Nr |
|
\vfill |
|
|
|
|
|
\newpage |
|
|
\vspace*{\fill} |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lllll} |
|
|
\hline\hline |
|
|
N & NAME & UNITS & LEVELS & DESCRIPTION \\ |
|
|
\hline |
|
|
|
|
|
&\\ |
|
|
50 & DUDT & $m/sec/day$ & Nrphys |
|
594 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
595 |
{Total U-Wind tendency} |
{Vertical Mass-Weighted Component of Velocity} |
596 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
597 |
51 & DVDT & $m/sec/day$ & Nrphys |
UTHMASS & $m-deg/sec$ & Nr |
598 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
599 |
{Total V-Wind tendency} |
{Zonal Mass-Weight Transp of Pot Temp} |
600 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
601 |
52 & DTDT & $deg/day$ & Nrphys |
VTHMASS & $m-deg/sec$ & Nr |
602 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
603 |
{Total Temperature tendency} |
{Meridional Mass-Weight Transp of Pot Temp} |
604 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
605 |
53 & DQDT & $g/kg/day$ & Nrphys |
WTHMASS & $m-deg/sec$ & Nr |
606 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
607 |
{Total Specific Humidity tendency} |
{Vertical Mass-Weight Transp of Pot Temp} |
608 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
609 |
54 & USTAR & $m/sec$ & 1 |
USLTMASS & $m-kg/sec-kg$ & Nr |
610 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
611 |
{Surface USTAR wind} |
{Zonal Mass-Weight Transp of Salt (or W.Vap Mix Rat.)} |
612 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
613 |
55 & Z0 & $m$ & 1 |
VSLTMASS & $m-kg/sec-kg$ & Nr |
614 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
615 |
{Surface roughness} |
{Meridional Mass-Weight Transp of Salt (or W.Vap Mix Rat.)} |
616 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
617 |
56 & FRQTRB & $0-1$ & Nrphys-1 |
WSLTMASS & $m-kg/sec-kg$ & Nr |
618 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
619 |
{Frequency of Turbulence} |
{Vertical Mass-Weight Transp of Salt (or W.Vap Mix Rat.)} |
620 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
621 |
57 & PBL & $mb$ & 1 |
UVELTH & $m-deg/sec$ & Nr |
622 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
623 |
{Planetary Boundary Layer depth} |
{Zonal Transp of Pot Temp} |
624 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
625 |
58 & SWCLR & $deg/day$ & Nrphys |
VVELTH & $m-deg/sec$ & Nr |
626 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
627 |
{Net clearsky Shortwave heating rate for each level} |
{Meridional Transp of Pot Temp} |
628 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
629 |
59 & OSR & $Watts/m^2$ & 1 |
WVELTH & $m-deg/sec$ & Nr |
630 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
631 |
{Net downward Shortwave flux at the top of the model} |
{Vertical Transp of Pot Temp} |
632 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
633 |
60 & OSRCLR & $Watts/m^2$ & 1 |
UVELSLT & $m-kg/sec-kg$ & Nr |
634 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
635 |
{Net downward clearsky Shortwave flux at the top of the model} |
{Zonal Transp of Salt (or W.Vap Mix Rat.)} |
636 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
637 |
61 & CLDMAS & $kg / m^2$ & Nrphys |
VVELSLT & $m-kg/sec-kg$ & Nr |
638 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
639 |
{Convective cloud mass flux} |
{Meridional Transp of Salt (or W.Vap Mix Rat.)} |
640 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
641 |
62 & UAVE & $m/sec$ & Nrphys |
WVELSLT & $m-kg/sec-kg$ & Nr |
642 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
643 |
{Time-averaged $u-Wind$} |
{Vertical Transp of Salt (or W.Vap Mix Rat.)} |
644 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
645 |
63 & VAVE & $m/sec$ & Nrphys |
\end{tabular} |
646 |
|
\vspace{1.5in} |
647 |
|
\vfill |
648 |
|
|
649 |
|
\newpage |
650 |
|
\vspace*{\fill} |
651 |
|
\begin{tabular}{llll} |
652 |
|
\hline\hline |
653 |
|
NAME & UNITS & LEVELS & DESCRIPTION \\ |
654 |
|
\hline |
655 |
|
|
656 |
|
&\\ |
657 |
|
RHOAnoma & $kg/m^3 $ & Nr |
658 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
659 |
{Time-averaged $v-Wind$} |
{Density Anomaly (=Rho-rhoConst)} |
660 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
661 |
64 & TAVE & $deg$ & Nrphys |
RHOANOSQ & $kg^2/m^6$ & Nr |
662 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
663 |
{Time-averaged $Temperature$} |
{Square of Density Anomaly (=(Rho-rhoConst))} |
664 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
665 |
65 & QAVE & $g/g$ & Nrphys |
URHOMASS & $kg/m^2/s$ & Nr |
666 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
667 |
{Time-averaged $Specific \, \, Humidity$} |
{Zonal Transport of Density} |
668 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
669 |
66 & PAVE & $mb$ & 1 |
VRHOMASS & $kg/m^2/s$ & Nr |
670 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
671 |
{Time-averaged $p_{surf} - p_{top}$} |
{Meridional Transport of Density} |
672 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
673 |
67 & QQAVE & $(m/sec)^2$ & Nrphys |
WRHOMASS & $kg/m^2/s$ & Nr |
674 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
675 |
{Time-averaged $Turbulent Kinetic Energy$} |
{Vertical Transport of Potential Density} |
676 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
677 |
68 & SWGCLR & $Watts/m^2$ & 1 |
PHIHYD & $m^2/s^2 $ & Nr |
678 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
679 |
{Net downward clearsky Shortwave flux at the ground} |
{Hydrostatic (ocean) pressure / (atmos) geo-Potential} |
680 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
681 |
69 & SDIAG1 & & 1 |
PHIHYDSQ & $m^4/s^4 $ & Nr |
682 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
683 |
{User-Defined Surface Diagnostic-1} |
{Square of Hyd. (ocean) press / (atmos) geoPotential} |
684 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
685 |
70 & SDIAG2 & & 1 |
PHIBOT & $m^2/s^2 $ & Nr |
686 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
687 |
{User-Defined Surface Diagnostic-2} |
{ocean bottom pressure / top. atmos geo-Potential} |
688 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
689 |
71 & UDIAG1 & & Nrphys |
PHIBOTSQ & $m^4/s^4 $ & Nr |
690 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
691 |
{User-Defined Upper-Air Diagnostic-1} |
{Square of ocean bottom pressure / top. geo-Potential} |
692 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
693 |
72 & UDIAG2 & & Nrphys |
DRHODR & $kg/m^3/{r-unit}$ & Nr |
694 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
695 |
{User-Defined Upper-Air Diagnostic-2} |
{Stratification: d.Sigma/dr} |
696 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
697 |
73 & DIABU & $m/sec/day$ & Nrphys |
VISCA4 & $m^4/sec$ & 1 |
698 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
699 |
{Total Diabatic forcing on $u-Wind$} |
{Biharmonic Viscosity Coefficient} |
700 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
701 |
74 & DIABV & $m/sec/day$ & Nrphys |
VISCAH & $m^2/sec$ & 1 |
702 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
703 |
{Total Diabatic forcing on $v-Wind$} |
{Harmonic Viscosity Coefficient} |
704 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
705 |
75 & DIABT & $deg/day$ & Nrphys |
TAUX & $N/m^2 $ & 1 |
706 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
707 |
{Total Diabatic forcing on $Temperature$} |
{zonal surface wind stress, >0 increases uVel} |
708 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
709 |
76 & DIABQ & $g/kg/day$ & Nrphys |
TAUY & $N/m^2 $ & 1 |
710 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
711 |
{Total Diabatic forcing on $Specific \, \, Humidity$} |
{meridional surf. wind stress, >0 increases vVel} |
712 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
713 |
|
TFLUX & $W/m^2 $ & 1 |
|
\end{tabular} |
|
|
\vfill |
|
|
|
|
|
\newpage |
|
|
\vspace*{\fill} |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lllll} |
|
|
\hline\hline |
|
|
N & NAME & UNITS & LEVELS & DESCRIPTION \\ |
|
|
\hline |
|
|
|
|
|
77 & VINTUQ & $m/sec \cdot g/kg$ & 1 |
|
714 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
715 |
{Vertically integrated $u \, q$} |
{net surface heat flux, >0 increases theta} |
716 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
717 |
78 & VINTVQ & $m/sec \cdot g/kg$ & 1 |
TRELAX & $W/m^2 $ & 1 |
718 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
719 |
{Vertically integrated $v \, q$} |
{surface temperature relaxation, >0 increases theta} |
720 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
721 |
79 & VINTUT & $m/sec \cdot deg$ & 1 |
TICE & $W/m^2 $ & 1 |
722 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
723 |
{Vertically integrated $u \, T$} |
{heat from melt/freeze of sea-ice, >0 increases theta} |
724 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
725 |
80 & VINTVT & $m/sec \cdot deg$ & 1 |
SFLUX & $g/m^2/s $ & 1 |
726 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
727 |
{Vertically integrated $v \, T$} |
{net surface salt flux, >0 increases salt} |
728 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
729 |
81 & CLDFRC & $0-1$ & 1 |
SRELAX & $g/m^2/s $ & 1 |
730 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
731 |
{Total Cloud Fraction} |
{surface salinity relaxation, >0 increases salt} |
732 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
733 |
82 & QINT & $gm/cm^2$ & 1 |
PRESSURE & $Pa $ & Nr |
734 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
735 |
{Precipitable water} |
{Atmospheric Pressure (Pa)} |
736 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
737 |
83 & U2M & $m/sec$ & 1 |
ADVr\_TH & $K.Pa.m^2/s $ & Nr |
738 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
739 |
{U-Wind at 2 meters} |
{Vertical Advective Flux of Pot.Temperature} |
740 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
741 |
84 & V2M & $m/sec$ & 1 |
ADVx\_TH & $K.Pa.m^2/s $ & Nr |
742 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
743 |
{V-Wind at 2 meters} |
{Zonal Advective Flux of Pot.Temperature} |
744 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
745 |
85 & T2M & $deg$ & 1 |
ADVy\_TH & $K.Pa.m^2/s $ & Nr |
746 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
747 |
{Temperature at 2 meters} |
{Meridional Advective Flux of Pot.Temperature} |
748 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
749 |
86 & Q2M & $g/kg$ & 1 |
DFrE\_TH & $K.Pa.m^2/s $ & Nr |
750 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
751 |
{Specific Humidity at 2 meters} |
{Vertical Diffusive Flux of Pot.Temperature (Explicit part)} |
752 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
753 |
87 & U10M & $m/sec$ & 1 |
DIFx\_TH & $K.Pa.m^2/s $ & Nr |
754 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
755 |
{U-Wind at 10 meters} |
{Zonal Diffusive Flux of Pot.Temperature} |
756 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
757 |
88 & V10M & $m/sec$ & 1 |
DIFy\_TH & $K.Pa.m^2/s $ & Nr |
758 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
759 |
{V-Wind at 10 meters} |
{Meridional Diffusive Flux of Pot.Temperature} |
760 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
761 |
89 & T10M & $deg$ & 1 |
DFrI\_TH & $K.Pa.m^2/s $ & Nr |
762 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
763 |
{Temperature at 10 meters} |
{Vertical Diffusive Flux of Pot.Temperature (Implicit part)} |
764 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
765 |
90 & Q10M & $g/kg$ & 1 |
ADVr\_SLT & $g/kg.Pa.m^2/s$ & Nr |
766 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
767 |
{Specific Humidity at 10 meters} |
{Vertical Advective Flux of Water-Vapor} |
768 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
769 |
91 & DTRAIN & $kg/m^2$ & Nrphys |
ADVx\_SLT & $g/kg.Pa.m^2/s$ & Nr |
770 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
771 |
{Detrainment Cloud Mass Flux} |
{Zonal Advective Flux of Water-Vapor} |
772 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
773 |
92 & QFILL & $g/kg/day$ & Nrphys |
ADVy\_SLT & $g/kg.Pa.m^2/s$ & Nr |
774 |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
775 |
{Filling of negative specific humidity} |
{Meridional Advective Flux of Water-Vapor} |
776 |
\end{minipage}\\ |
\end{minipage}\\ |
777 |
|
\end{tabular} |
778 |
|
\vspace{1.5in} |
779 |
|
\vfill |
780 |
|
|
781 |
|
\newpage |
782 |
|
\vspace*{\fill} |
783 |
|
\begin{tabular}{llll} |
784 |
|
\hline\hline |
785 |
|
NAME & UNITS & LEVELS & DESCRIPTION \\ |
786 |
|
\hline |
787 |
|
|
788 |
|
&\\ |
789 |
|
DFrE\_SLT & $g/kg.Pa.m^2/s$ & Nr |
790 |
|
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
791 |
|
{Vertical Diffusive Flux of Water-Vapor (Explicit part)} |
792 |
|
\end{minipage}\\ |
793 |
|
DIFx\_SLT & $g/kg.Pa.m^2/s$ & Nr |
794 |
|
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
795 |
|
{Zonal Diffusive Flux of Water-Vapor} |
796 |
|
\end{minipage}\\ |
797 |
|
DIFy\_SLT & $g/kg.Pa.m^2/s$ & Nr |
798 |
|
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
799 |
|
{Meridional Diffusive Flux of Water-Vapor} |
800 |
|
\end{minipage}\\ |
801 |
|
DFrI\_SLT & $g/kg.Pa.m^2/s$ & Nr |
802 |
|
&\begin{minipage}[t]{3in} |
803 |
|
{Vertical Diffusive Flux of Water-Vapor (Implicit part)} |
804 |
|
\end{minipage}\\ |
805 |
\end{tabular} |
\end{tabular} |
806 |
\vspace{1.5in} |
\vspace{1.5in} |
807 |
\vfill |
\vfill |
823 |
output frequency of the diagnostic, and $\Delta t$ is |
output frequency of the diagnostic, and $\Delta t$ is |
824 |
the timestep over which the diagnostic is updated. |
the timestep over which the diagnostic is updated. |
825 |
|
|
|
{\bf 1) \underline {UFLUX} Surface Zonal Wind Stress on the Atmosphere ($Newton/m^2$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
The zonal wind stress is the turbulent flux of zonal momentum from |
|
|
the surface. See section 3.3 for a description of the surface layer parameterization. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf UFLUX} = - \rho C_D W_s u \hspace{1cm}where: \hspace{.2cm}C_D = C^2_u |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where $\rho$ = the atmospheric density at the surface, $C_{D}$ is the surface |
|
|
drag coefficient, $C_u$ is the dimensionless surface exchange coefficient for momentum |
|
|
(see diagnostic number 10), $W_s$ is the magnitude of the surface layer wind, and $u$ is |
|
|
the zonal wind in the lowest model layer. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{\bf 2) \underline {VFLUX} Surface Meridional Wind Stress on the Atmosphere ($Newton/m^2$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
The meridional wind stress is the turbulent flux of meridional momentum from |
|
|
the surface. See section 3.3 for a description of the surface layer parameterization. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf VFLUX} = - \rho C_D W_s v \hspace{1cm}where: \hspace{.2cm}C_D = C^2_u |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where $\rho$ = the atmospheric density at the surface, $C_{D}$ is the surface |
|
|
drag coefficient, $C_u$ is the dimensionless surface exchange coefficient for momentum |
|
|
(see diagnostic number 10), $W_s$ is the magnitude of the surface layer wind, and $v$ is |
|
|
the meridional wind in the lowest model layer. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
{\bf 3) \underline {HFLUX} Surface Flux of Sensible Heat ($Watts/m^2$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
The turbulent flux of sensible heat from the surface to the atmosphere is a function of the |
|
|
gradient of virtual potential temperature and the eddy exchange coefficient: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf HFLUX} = P^{\kappa}\rho c_{p} C_{H} W_s (\theta_{surface} - \theta_{Nrphys}) |
|
|
\hspace{1cm}where: \hspace{.2cm}C_H = C_u C_t |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where $\rho$ = the atmospheric density at the surface, $c_{p}$ is the specific |
|
|
heat of air, $C_{H}$ is the dimensionless surface heat transfer coefficient, $W_s$ is the |
|
|
magnitude of the surface layer wind, $C_u$ is the dimensionless surface exchange coefficient |
|
|
for momentum (see diagnostic number 10), $C_t$ is the dimensionless surface exchange coefficient |
|
|
for heat and moisture (see diagnostic number 9), and $\theta$ is the potential temperature |
|
|
at the surface and at the bottom model level. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{\bf 4) \underline {EFLUX} Surface Flux of Latent Heat ($Watts/m^2$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
The turbulent flux of latent heat from the surface to the atmosphere is a function of the |
|
|
gradient of moisture, the potential evapotranspiration fraction and the eddy exchange coefficient: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf EFLUX} = \rho \beta L C_{H} W_s (q_{surface} - q_{Nrphys}) |
|
|
\hspace{1cm}where: \hspace{.2cm}C_H = C_u C_t |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where $\rho$ = the atmospheric density at the surface, $\beta$ is the fraction of |
|
|
the potential evapotranspiration actually evaporated, L is the latent |
|
|
heat of evaporation, $C_{H}$ is the dimensionless surface heat transfer coefficient, $W_s$ is the |
|
|
magnitude of the surface layer wind, $C_u$ is the dimensionless surface exchange coefficient |
|
|
for momentum (see diagnostic number 10), $C_t$ is the dimensionless surface exchange coefficient |
|
|
for heat and moisture (see diagnostic number 9), and $q_{surface}$ and $q_{Nrphys}$ are the specific |
|
|
humidity at the surface and at the bottom model level, respectively. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
{\bf 5) \underline {QICE} Heat Conduction Through Sea Ice ($Watts/m^2$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
Over sea ice there is an additional source of energy at the surface due to the heat |
|
|
conduction from the relatively warm ocean through the sea ice. The heat conduction |
|
|
through sea ice represents an additional energy source term for the ground temperature equation. |
|
|
|
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf QICE} = {C_{ti} \over {H_i}} (T_i-T_g) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
where $C_{ti}$ is the thermal conductivity of ice, $H_i$ is the ice thickness, assumed to |
|
|
be $3 \hspace{.1cm} m$ where sea ice is present, $T_i$ is 273 degrees Kelvin, and |
|
|
$T_g$ is the temperature of the sea ice. |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: QICE is not available through model version 5.3, but is available in subsequent versions. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{\bf 6) \underline {RADLWG} Net upward Longwave Flux at the surface ($Watts/m^2$)} |
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{eqnarray*} |
|
|
{\bf RADLWG} & = & F_{LW,Nrphys+1}^{Net} \\ |
|
|
& = & F_{LW,Nrphys+1}^\uparrow - F_{LW,Nrphys+1}^\downarrow |
|
|
\end{eqnarray*} |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
where Nrphys+1 indicates the lowest model edge-level, or $p = p_{surf}$. |
|
|
$F_{LW}^\uparrow$ is |
|
|
the upward Longwave flux and $F_{LW}^\downarrow$ is the downward Longwave flux. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
{\bf 7) \underline {RADSWG} Net downard shortwave Flux at the surface ($Watts/m^2$)} |
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{eqnarray*} |
|
|
{\bf RADSWG} & = & F_{SW,Nrphys+1}^{Net} \\ |
|
|
& = & F_{SW,Nrphys+1}^\downarrow - F_{SW,Nrphys+1}^\uparrow |
|
|
\end{eqnarray*} |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
where Nrphys+1 indicates the lowest model edge-level, or $p = p_{surf}$. |
|
|
$F_{SW}^\downarrow$ is |
|
|
the downward Shortwave flux and $F_{SW}^\uparrow$ is the upward Shortwave flux. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 8) \underline {RI} Richardson Number} ($dimensionless$) |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The non-dimensional stability indicator is the ratio of the buoyancy to the shear: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf RI} = { { {g \over \theta_v} \pp {\theta_v}{z} } \over { (\pp{u}{z})^2 + (\pp{v}{z})^2 } } |
|
|
= { {c_p \pp{\theta_v}{z} \pp{P^ \kappa}{z} } \over { (\pp{u}{z})^2 + (\pp{v}{z})^2 } } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
where we used the hydrostatic equation: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\pp{\Phi}{P^ \kappa}} = c_p \theta_v |
|
|
\] |
|
|
Negative values indicate unstable buoyancy {\bf{AND}} shear, small positive values ($<0.4$) |
|
|
indicate dominantly unstable shear, and large positive values indicate dominantly stable |
|
|
stratification. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 9) \underline {CT} Surface Exchange Coefficient for Temperature and Moisture ($dimensionless$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The surface exchange coefficient is obtained from the similarity functions for the stability |
|
|
dependant flux profile relationships: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf CT} = -{( {\overline{w^{\prime}\theta^{\prime}}}) \over {u_* \Delta \theta }} = |
|
|
-{( {\overline{w^{\prime}q^{\prime}}}) \over {u_* \Delta q }} = |
|
|
{ k \over { (\psi_{h} + \psi_{g}) } } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where $\psi_h$ is the surface layer non-dimensional temperature change and $\psi_g$ is the |
|
|
viscous sublayer non-dimensional temperature or moisture change: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\psi_{h} = {\int_{\zeta_{0}}^{\zeta} {\phi_{h} \over \zeta} d \zeta} \hspace{1cm} and |
|
|
\hspace{1cm} \psi_{g} = { 0.55 (Pr^{2/3} - 0.2) \over \nu^{1/2} } |
|
|
(h_{0}u_{*} - h_{0_{ref}}u_{*_{ref}})^{1/2} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
and: |
|
|
$h_{0} = 30z_{0}$ with a maximum value over land of 0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
$\phi_h$ is the similarity function of $\zeta$, which expresses the stability dependance of |
|
|
the temperature and moisture gradients, specified differently for stable and unstable |
|
|
layers according to Helfand and Schubert, 1993. k is the Von Karman constant, $\zeta$ is the |
|
|
non-dimensional stability parameter, Pr is the Prandtl number for air, $\nu$ is the molecular |
|
|
viscosity, $z_{0}$ is the surface roughness length, $u_*$ is the surface stress velocity |
|
|
(see diagnostic number 67), and the subscript ref refers to a reference value. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 10) \underline {CU} Surface Exchange Coefficient for Momentum ($dimensionless$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The surface exchange coefficient is obtained from the similarity functions for the stability |
|
|
dependant flux profile relationships: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf CU} = {u_* \over W_s} = { k \over \psi_{m} } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where $\psi_m$ is the surface layer non-dimensional wind shear: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\psi_{m} = {\int_{\zeta_{0}}^{\zeta} {\phi_{m} \over \zeta} d \zeta} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
$\phi_m$ is the similarity function of $\zeta$, which expresses the stability dependance of |
|
|
the temperature and moisture gradients, specified differently for stable and unstable layers |
|
|
according to Helfand and Schubert, 1993. k is the Von Karman constant, $\zeta$ is the |
|
|
non-dimensional stability parameter, $u_*$ is the surface stress velocity |
|
|
(see diagnostic number 67), and $W_s$ is the magnitude of the surface layer wind. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 11) \underline {ET} Diffusivity Coefficient for Temperature and Moisture ($m^2/sec$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
In the level 2.5 version of the Mellor-Yamada (1974) hierarchy, the turbulent heat or |
|
|
moisture flux for the atmosphere above the surface layer can be expressed as a turbulent |
|
|
diffusion coefficient $K_h$ times the negative of the gradient of potential temperature |
|
|
or moisture. In the Helfand and Labraga (1988) adaptation of this closure, $K_h$ |
|
|
takes the form: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf ET} = K_h = -{( {\overline{w^{\prime}\theta_v^{\prime}}}) \over {\pp{\theta_v}{z}} } |
|
|
= \left\{ \begin{array}{l@{\quad\mbox{for}\quad}l} q \, \ell \, S_H(G_M,G_H) & \mbox{decaying turbulence} |
|
|
\\ { q^2 \over {q_e} } \, \ell \, S_{H}(G_{M_e},G_{H_e}) & \mbox{growing turbulence} \end{array} \right. |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where $q$ is the turbulent velocity, or $\sqrt{2*turbulent \hspace{.2cm} kinetic \hspace{.2cm} |
|
|
energy}$, $q_e$ is the turbulence velocity derived from the more simple level 2.0 model, |
|
|
which describes equilibrium turbulence, $\ell$ is the master length scale related to the layer |
|
|
depth, |
|
|
$S_H$ is a function of $G_H$ and $G_M$, the dimensionless buoyancy and |
|
|
wind shear parameters, respectively, or a function of $G_{H_e}$ and $G_{M_e}$, the equilibrium |
|
|
dimensionless buoyancy and wind shear |
|
|
parameters. Both $G_H$ and $G_M$, and their equilibrium values $G_{H_e}$ and $G_{M_e}$, |
|
|
are functions of the Richardson number. |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
For the detailed equations and derivations of the modified level 2.5 closure scheme, |
|
|
see Helfand and Labraga, 1988. |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
In the surface layer, ${\bf {ET}}$ is the exchange coefficient for heat and moisture, |
|
|
in units of $m/sec$, given by: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf ET_{Nrphys}} = C_t * u_* = C_H W_s |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $C_t$ is the dimensionless exchange coefficient for heat and moisture from the |
|
|
surface layer similarity functions (see diagnostic number 9), $u_*$ is the surface |
|
|
friction velocity (see diagnostic number 67), $C_H$ is the heat transfer coefficient, |
|
|
and $W_s$ is the magnitude of the surface layer wind. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 12) \underline {EU} Diffusivity Coefficient for Momentum ($m^2/sec$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
In the level 2.5 version of the Mellor-Yamada (1974) hierarchy, the turbulent heat |
|
|
momentum flux for the atmosphere above the surface layer can be expressed as a turbulent |
|
|
diffusion coefficient $K_m$ times the negative of the gradient of the u-wind. |
|
|
In the Helfand and Labraga (1988) adaptation of this closure, $K_m$ |
|
|
takes the form: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf EU} = K_m = -{( {\overline{u^{\prime}w^{\prime}}}) \over {\pp{U}{z}} } |
|
|
= \left\{ \begin{array}{l@{\quad\mbox{for}\quad}l} q \, \ell \, S_M(G_M,G_H) & \mbox{decaying turbulence} |
|
|
\\ { q^2 \over {q_e} } \, \ell \, S_{M}(G_{M_e},G_{H_e}) & \mbox{growing turbulence} \end{array} \right. |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $q$ is the turbulent velocity, or $\sqrt{2*turbulent \hspace{.2cm} kinetic \hspace{.2cm} |
|
|
energy}$, $q_e$ is the turbulence velocity derived from the more simple level 2.0 model, |
|
|
which describes equilibrium turbulence, $\ell$ is the master length scale related to the layer |
|
|
depth, |
|
|
$S_M$ is a function of $G_H$ and $G_M$, the dimensionless buoyancy and |
|
|
wind shear parameters, respectively, or a function of $G_{H_e}$ and $G_{M_e}$, the equilibrium |
|
|
dimensionless buoyancy and wind shear |
|
|
parameters. Both $G_H$ and $G_M$, and their equilibrium values $G_{H_e}$ and $G_{M_e}$, |
|
|
are functions of the Richardson number. |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
For the detailed equations and derivations of the modified level 2.5 closure scheme, |
|
|
see Helfand and Labraga, 1988. |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
In the surface layer, ${\bf {EU}}$ is the exchange coefficient for momentum, |
|
|
in units of $m/sec$, given by: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf EU_{Nrphys}} = C_u * u_* = C_D W_s |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $C_u$ is the dimensionless exchange coefficient for momentum from the surface layer |
|
|
similarity functions (see diagnostic number 10), $u_*$ is the surface friction velocity |
|
|
(see diagnostic number 67), $C_D$ is the surface drag coefficient, and $W_s$ is the |
|
|
magnitude of the surface layer wind. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 13) \underline {TURBU} Zonal U-Momentum changes due to Turbulence ($m/sec/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The tendency of U-Momentum due to turbulence is written: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf TURBU} = {\pp{u}{t}}_{turb} = {\pp{}{z} }{(- \overline{u^{\prime}w^{\prime}})} |
|
|
= {\pp{}{z} }{(K_m \pp{u}{z})} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The Helfand and Labraga level 2.5 scheme models the turbulent |
|
|
flux of u-momentum in terms of $K_m$, and the equation has the form of a diffusion |
|
|
equation. |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 14) \underline {TURBV} Meridional V-Momentum changes due to Turbulence ($m/sec/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The tendency of V-Momentum due to turbulence is written: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf TURBV} = {\pp{v}{t}}_{turb} = {\pp{}{z} }{(- \overline{v^{\prime}w^{\prime}})} |
|
|
= {\pp{}{z} }{(K_m \pp{v}{z})} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The Helfand and Labraga level 2.5 scheme models the turbulent |
|
|
flux of v-momentum in terms of $K_m$, and the equation has the form of a diffusion |
|
|
equation. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 15) \underline {TURBT} Temperature changes due to Turbulence ($deg/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The tendency of temperature due to turbulence is written: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf TURBT} = {\pp{T}{t}} = P^{\kappa}{\pp{\theta}{t}}_{turb} = |
|
|
P^{\kappa}{\pp{}{z} }{(- \overline{w^{\prime}\theta^{\prime}})} |
|
|
= P^{\kappa}{\pp{}{z} }{(K_h \pp{\theta_v}{z})} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The Helfand and Labraga level 2.5 scheme models the turbulent |
|
|
flux of temperature in terms of $K_h$, and the equation has the form of a diffusion |
|
|
equation. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 16) \underline {TURBQ} Specific Humidity changes due to Turbulence ($g/kg/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The tendency of specific humidity due to turbulence is written: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf TURBQ} = {\pp{q}{t}}_{turb} = {\pp{}{z} }{(- \overline{w^{\prime}q^{\prime}})} |
|
|
= {\pp{}{z} }{(K_h \pp{q}{z})} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The Helfand and Labraga level 2.5 scheme models the turbulent |
|
|
flux of temperature in terms of $K_h$, and the equation has the form of a diffusion |
|
|
equation. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 17) \underline {MOISTT} Temperature Changes Due to Moist Processes ($deg/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf MOISTT} = \left. {\pp{T}{t}}\right|_{c} + \left. {\pp{T}{t}} \right|_{ls} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\left.{\pp{T}{t}}\right|_{c} = R \sum_i \left( \alpha { m_B \over c_p} \Gamma_s \right)_i |
|
|
\hspace{.4cm} and |
|
|
\hspace{.4cm} \left.{\pp{T}{t}}\right|_{ls} = {L \over c_p } (q^*-q) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
and |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\Gamma_s = g \eta \pp{s}{p} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The subscript $c$ refers to convective processes, while the subscript $ls$ refers to large scale |
|
|
precipitation processes, or supersaturation rain. |
|
|
The summation refers to contributions from each cloud type called by RAS. |
|
|
The dry static energy is given |
|
|
as $s$, the convective cloud base mass flux is given as $m_B$, and the cloud entrainment is |
|
|
given as $\eta$, which are explicitly defined in Section \ref{sec:fizhi:mc}, |
|
|
the description of the convective parameterization. The fractional adjustment, or relaxation |
|
|
parameter, for each cloud type is given as $\alpha$, while |
|
|
$R$ is the rain re-evaporation adjustment. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 18) \underline {MOISTQ} Specific Humidity Changes Due to Moist Processes ($g/kg/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf MOISTQ} = \left. {\pp{q}{t}}\right|_{c} + \left. {\pp{q}{t}} \right|_{ls} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\left.{\pp{q}{t}}\right|_{c} = R \sum_i \left( \alpha { m_B \over {L}}(\Gamma_h-\Gamma_s) \right)_i |
|
|
\hspace{.4cm} and |
|
|
\hspace{.4cm} \left.{\pp{q}{t}}\right|_{ls} = (q^*-q) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
and |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\Gamma_s = g \eta \pp{s}{p}\hspace{.4cm} and \hspace{.4cm}\Gamma_h = g \eta \pp{h}{p} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The subscript $c$ refers to convective processes, while the subscript $ls$ refers to large scale |
|
|
precipitation processes, or supersaturation rain. |
|
|
The summation refers to contributions from each cloud type called by RAS. |
|
|
The dry static energy is given as $s$, |
|
|
the moist static energy is given as $h$, |
|
|
the convective cloud base mass flux is given as $m_B$, and the cloud entrainment is |
|
|
given as $\eta$, which are explicitly defined in Section \ref{sec:fizhi:mc}, |
|
|
the description of the convective parameterization. The fractional adjustment, or relaxation |
|
|
parameter, for each cloud type is given as $\alpha$, while |
|
|
$R$ is the rain re-evaporation adjustment. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 19) \underline {RADLW} Heating Rate due to Longwave Radiation ($deg/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The net longwave heating rate is calculated as the vertical divergence of the |
|
|
net terrestrial radiative fluxes. |
|
|
Both the clear-sky and cloudy-sky longwave fluxes are computed within the |
|
|
longwave routine. |
|
|
The subroutine calculates the clear-sky flux, $F^{clearsky}_{LW}$, first. |
|
|
For a given cloud fraction, |
|
|
the clear line-of-sight probability $C(p,p^{\prime})$ is computed from the current level pressure $p$ |
|
|
to the model top pressure, $p^{\prime} = p_{top}$, and the model surface pressure, $p^{\prime} = p_{surf}$, |
|
|
for the upward and downward radiative fluxes. |
|
|
(see Section \ref{sec:fizhi:radcloud}). |
|
|
The cloudy-sky flux is then obtained as: |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
F_{LW} = C(p,p') \cdot F^{clearsky}_{LW}, |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
Finally, the net longwave heating rate is calculated as the vertical divergence of the |
|
|
net terrestrial radiative fluxes: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\pp{\rho c_p T}{t} = - {\partial \over \partial z} F_{LW}^{NET} , |
|
|
\] |
|
|
or |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf RADLW} = \frac{g}{c_p \pi} {\partial \over \partial \sigma} F_{LW}^{NET} . |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $g$ is the accelation due to gravity, |
|
|
$c_p$ is the heat capacity of air at constant pressure, |
|
|
and |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
F_{LW}^{NET} = F_{LW}^\uparrow - F_{LW}^\downarrow |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 20) \underline {RADSW} Heating Rate due to Shortwave Radiation ($deg/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The net Shortwave heating rate is calculated as the vertical divergence of the |
|
|
net solar radiative fluxes. |
|
|
The clear-sky and cloudy-sky shortwave fluxes are calculated separately. |
|
|
For the clear-sky case, the shortwave fluxes and heating rates are computed with |
|
|
both CLMO (maximum overlap cloud fraction) and |
|
|
CLRO (random overlap cloud fraction) set to zero (see Section \ref{sec:fizhi:radcloud}). |
|
|
The shortwave routine is then called a second time, for the cloudy-sky case, with the |
|
|
true time-averaged cloud fractions CLMO |
|
|
and CLRO being used. In all cases, a normalized incident shortwave flux is used as |
|
|
input at the top of the atmosphere. |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The heating rate due to Shortwave Radiation under cloudy skies is defined as: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\pp{\rho c_p T}{t} = - {\partial \over \partial z} F(cloudy)_{SW}^{NET} \cdot {\rm RADSWT}, |
|
|
\] |
|
|
or |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf RADSW} = \frac{g}{c_p \pi} {\partial \over \partial \sigma} F(cloudy)_{SW}^{NET}\cdot {\rm RADSWT} . |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $g$ is the accelation due to gravity, |
|
|
$c_p$ is the heat capacity of air at constant pressure, RADSWT is the true incident |
|
|
shortwave radiation at the top of the atmosphere (See Diagnostic \#48), and |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
F(cloudy)_{SW}^{Net} = F(cloudy)_{SW}^\uparrow - F(cloudy)_{SW}^\downarrow |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 21) \underline {PREACC} Total (Large-scale + Convective) Accumulated Precipition ($mm/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
For a change in specific humidity due to moist processes, $\Delta q_{moist}$, |
|
|
the vertical integral or total precipitable amount is given by: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf PREACC} = \int_{surf}^{top} \rho \Delta q_{moist} dz = - \int_{surf}^{top} \Delta q_{moist} |
|
|
{dp \over g} = {1 \over g} \int_0^1 \Delta q_{moist} dp |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
A precipitation rate is defined as the vertically integrated moisture adjustment per Moist Processes |
|
|
time step, scaled to $mm/day$. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 22) \underline {PRECON} Convective Precipition ($mm/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
For a change in specific humidity due to sub-grid scale cumulus convective processes, $\Delta q_{cum}$, |
|
|
the vertical integral or total precipitable amount is given by: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf PRECON} = \int_{surf}^{top} \rho \Delta q_{cum} dz = - \int_{surf}^{top} \Delta q_{cum} |
|
|
{dp \over g} = {1 \over g} \int_0^1 \Delta q_{cum} dp |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
A precipitation rate is defined as the vertically integrated moisture adjustment per Moist Processes |
|
|
time step, scaled to $mm/day$. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 23) \underline {TUFLUX} Turbulent Flux of U-Momentum ($Newton/m^2$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The turbulent flux of u-momentum is calculated for $diagnostic \hspace{.2cm} purposes |
|
|
\hspace{.2cm} only$ from the eddy coefficient for momentum: |
|
|
|
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf TUFLUX} = {\rho } {(\overline{u^{\prime}w^{\prime}})} = |
|
|
{\rho } {(- K_m \pp{U}{z})} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $\rho$ is the air density, and $K_m$ is the eddy coefficient. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 24) \underline {TVFLUX} Turbulent Flux of V-Momentum ($Newton/m^2$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The turbulent flux of v-momentum is calculated for $diagnostic \hspace{.2cm} purposes |
|
|
\hspace{.2cm} only$ from the eddy coefficient for momentum: |
|
|
|
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf TVFLUX} = {\rho } {(\overline{v^{\prime}w^{\prime}})} = |
|
|
{\rho } {(- K_m \pp{V}{z})} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $\rho$ is the air density, and $K_m$ is the eddy coefficient. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 25) \underline {TTFLUX} Turbulent Flux of Sensible Heat ($Watts/m^2$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The turbulent flux of sensible heat is calculated for $diagnostic \hspace{.2cm} purposes |
|
|
\hspace{.2cm} only$ from the eddy coefficient for heat and moisture: |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf TTFLUX} = c_p {\rho } |
|
|
P^{\kappa}{(\overline{w^{\prime}\theta^{\prime}})} |
|
|
= c_p {\rho } P^{\kappa}{(- K_h \pp{\theta_v}{z})} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $\rho$ is the air density, and $K_h$ is the eddy coefficient. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 26) \underline {TQFLUX} Turbulent Flux of Latent Heat ($Watts/m^2$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The turbulent flux of latent heat is calculated for $diagnostic \hspace{.2cm} purposes |
|
|
\hspace{.2cm} only$ from the eddy coefficient for heat and moisture: |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf TQFLUX} = {L {\rho } (\overline{w^{\prime}q^{\prime}})} = |
|
|
{L {\rho }(- K_h \pp{q}{z})} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $\rho$ is the air density, and $K_h$ is the eddy coefficient. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 27) \underline {CN} Neutral Drag Coefficient ($dimensionless$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The drag coefficient for momentum obtained by assuming a neutrally stable surface layer: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf CN} = { k \over { \ln({h \over {z_0}})} } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $k$ is the Von Karman constant, $h$ is the height of the surface layer, and |
|
|
$z_0$ is the surface roughness. |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
NOTE: CN is not available through model version 5.3, but is available in subsequent |
|
|
versions. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 28) \underline {WINDS} Surface Wind Speed ($meter/sec$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The surface wind speed is calculated for the last internal turbulence time step: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf WINDS} = \sqrt{u_{Nrphys}^2 + v_{Nrphys}^2} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where the subscript $Nrphys$ refers to the lowest model level. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 29) \underline {DTSRF} Air/Surface Virtual Temperature Difference ($deg \hspace{.1cm} K$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The air/surface virtual temperature difference measures the stability of the surface layer: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf DTSRF} = (\theta_{v{Nrphys+1}} - \theta{v_{Nrphys}}) P^{\kappa}_{surf} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\theta_{v{Nrphys+1}} = { T_g \over {P^{\kappa}_{surf}} } (1 + .609 q_{Nrphys+1}) \hspace{1cm} |
|
|
and \hspace{1cm} q_{Nrphys+1} = q_{Nrphys} + \beta(q^*(T_g,P_s) - q_{Nrphys}) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
$\beta$ is the surface potential evapotranspiration coefficient ($\beta=1$ over oceans), |
|
|
$q^*(T_g,P_s)$ is the saturation specific humidity at the ground temperature |
|
|
and surface pressure, level $Nrphys$ refers to the lowest model level and level $Nrphys+1$ |
|
|
refers to the surface. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 30) \underline {TG} Ground Temperature ($deg \hspace{.1cm} K$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The ground temperature equation is solved as part of the turbulence package |
|
|
using a backward implicit time differencing scheme: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf TG} \hspace{.1cm} is \hspace{.1cm} obtained \hspace{.1cm} from: \hspace{.1cm} |
|
|
C_g\pp{T_g}{t} = R_{sw} - R_{lw} + Q_{ice} - H - LE |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $R_{sw}$ is the net surface downward shortwave radiative flux, $R_{lw}$ is the |
|
|
net surface upward longwave radiative flux, $Q_{ice}$ is the heat conduction through |
|
|
sea ice, $H$ is the upward sensible heat flux, $LE$ is the upward latent heat |
|
|
flux, and $C_g$ is the total heat capacity of the ground. |
|
|
$C_g$ is obtained by solving a heat diffusion equation |
|
|
for the penetration of the diurnal cycle into the ground (Blackadar, 1977), and is given by: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
C_g = \sqrt{ {\lambda C_s \over {2 \omega} } } = \sqrt{(0.386 + 0.536W + 0.15W^2)2x10^{-3} |
|
|
{ 86400. \over {2 \pi} } } \, \, . |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
Here, the thermal conductivity, $\lambda$, is equal to $2x10^{-3}$ ${ly\over{ sec}} |
|
|
{cm \over {^oK}}$, |
|
|
the angular velocity of the earth, $\omega$, is written as $86400$ $sec/day$ divided |
|
|
by $2 \pi$ $radians/ |
|
|
day$, and the expression for $C_s$, the heat capacity per unit volume at the surface, |
|
|
is a function of the ground wetness, $W$. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 31) \underline {TS} Surface Temperature ($deg \hspace{.1cm} K$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The surface temperature estimate is made by assuming that the model's lowest |
|
|
layer is well-mixed, and therefore that $\theta$ is constant in that layer. |
|
|
The surface temperature is therefore: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf TS} = \theta_{Nrphys} P^{\kappa}_{surf} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 32) \underline {DTG} Surface Temperature Adjustment ($deg \hspace{.1cm} K$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The change in surface temperature from one turbulence time step to the next, solved |
|
|
using the Ground Temperature Equation (see diagnostic number 30) is calculated: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf DTG} = {T_g}^{n} - {T_g}^{n-1} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where superscript $n$ refers to the new, updated time level, and the superscript $n-1$ |
|
|
refers to the value at the previous turbulence time level. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 33) \underline {QG} Ground Specific Humidity ($g/kg$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The ground specific humidity is obtained by interpolating between the specific |
|
|
humidity at the lowest model level and the specific humidity of a saturated ground. |
|
|
The interpolation is performed using the potential evapotranspiration function: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf QG} = q_{Nrphys+1} = q_{Nrphys} + \beta(q^*(T_g,P_s) - q_{Nrphys}) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $\beta$ is the surface potential evapotranspiration coefficient ($\beta=1$ over oceans), |
|
|
and $q^*(T_g,P_s)$ is the saturation specific humidity at the ground temperature and surface |
|
|
pressure. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 34) \underline {QS} Saturation Surface Specific Humidity ($g/kg$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The surface saturation specific humidity is the saturation specific humidity at |
|
|
the ground temprature and surface pressure: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf QS} = q^*(T_g,P_s) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 35) \underline {TGRLW} Instantaneous ground temperature used as input to the Longwave |
|
|
radiation subroutine (deg)} |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf TGRLW} = T_g(\lambda , \phi ,n) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $T_g$ is the model ground temperature at the current time step $n$. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 36) \underline {ST4} Upward Longwave flux at the surface ($Watts/m^2$) } |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf ST4} = \sigma T^4 |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $\sigma$ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant and T is the temperature. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 37) \underline {OLR} Net upward Longwave flux at $p=p_{top}$ ($Watts/m^2$) } |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf OLR} = F_{LW,top}^{NET} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where top indicates the top of the first model layer. |
|
|
In the GCM, $p_{top}$ = 0.0 mb. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 38) \underline {OLRCLR} Net upward clearsky Longwave flux at $p=p_{top}$ ($Watts/m^2$) } |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf OLRCLR} = F(clearsky)_{LW,top}^{NET} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where top indicates the top of the first model layer. |
|
|
In the GCM, $p_{top}$ = 0.0 mb. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 39) \underline {LWGCLR} Net upward clearsky Longwave flux at the surface ($Watts/m^2$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
\begin{eqnarray*} |
|
|
{\bf LWGCLR} & = & F(clearsky)_{LW,Nrphys+1}^{Net} \\ |
|
|
& = & F(clearsky)_{LW,Nrphys+1}^\uparrow - F(clearsky)_{LW,Nrphys+1}^\downarrow |
|
|
\end{eqnarray*} |
|
|
where Nrphys+1 indicates the lowest model edge-level, or $p = p_{surf}$. |
|
|
$F(clearsky)_{LW}^\uparrow$ is |
|
|
the upward clearsky Longwave flux and the $F(clearsky)_{LW}^\downarrow$ is the downward clearsky Longwave flux. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 40) \underline {LWCLR} Heating Rate due to Clearsky Longwave Radiation ($deg/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The net longwave heating rate is calculated as the vertical divergence of the |
|
|
net terrestrial radiative fluxes. |
|
|
Both the clear-sky and cloudy-sky longwave fluxes are computed within the |
|
|
longwave routine. |
|
|
The subroutine calculates the clear-sky flux, $F^{clearsky}_{LW}$, first. |
|
|
For a given cloud fraction, |
|
|
the clear line-of-sight probability $C(p,p^{\prime})$ is computed from the current level pressure $p$ |
|
|
to the model top pressure, $p^{\prime} = p_{top}$, and the model surface pressure, $p^{\prime} = p_{surf}$, |
|
|
for the upward and downward radiative fluxes. |
|
|
(see Section \ref{sec:fizhi:radcloud}). |
|
|
The cloudy-sky flux is then obtained as: |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
F_{LW} = C(p,p') \cdot F^{clearsky}_{LW}, |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
Thus, {\bf LWCLR} is defined as the net longwave heating rate due to the |
|
|
vertical divergence of the |
|
|
clear-sky longwave radiative flux: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\pp{\rho c_p T}{t}_{clearsky} = - {\partial \over \partial z} F(clearsky)_{LW}^{NET} , |
|
|
\] |
|
|
or |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf LWCLR} = \frac{g}{c_p \pi} {\partial \over \partial \sigma} F(clearsky)_{LW}^{NET} . |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $g$ is the accelation due to gravity, |
|
|
$c_p$ is the heat capacity of air at constant pressure, |
|
|
and |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
F(clearsky)_{LW}^{Net} = F(clearsky)_{LW}^\uparrow - F(clearsky)_{LW}^\downarrow |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 41) \underline {TLW} Instantaneous temperature used as input to the Longwave |
|
|
radiation subroutine (deg)} |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf TLW} = T(\lambda , \phi ,level, n) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $T$ is the model temperature at the current time step $n$. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 42) \underline {SHLW} Instantaneous specific humidity used as input to |
|
|
the Longwave radiation subroutine (kg/kg)} |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf SHLW} = q(\lambda , \phi , level , n) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $q$ is the model specific humidity at the current time step $n$. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 43) \underline {OZLW} Instantaneous ozone used as input to |
|
|
the Longwave radiation subroutine (kg/kg)} |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf OZLW} = {\rm OZ}(\lambda , \phi , level , n) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $\rm OZ$ is the interpolated ozone data set from the climatological monthly |
|
|
mean zonally averaged ozone data set. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 44) \underline {CLMOLW} Maximum Overlap cloud fraction used in LW Radiation ($0-1$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf CLMOLW} is the time-averaged maximum overlap cloud fraction that has been filled by the Relaxed |
|
|
Arakawa/Schubert Convection scheme and will be used in the Longwave Radiation algorithm. These are |
|
|
convective clouds whose radiative characteristics are assumed to be correlated in the vertical. |
|
|
For a complete description of cloud/radiative interactions, see Section \ref{sec:fizhi:radcloud}. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf CLMOLW} = CLMO_{RAS,LW}(\lambda, \phi, level ) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{\bf 45) \underline {CLDTOT} Total cloud fraction used in LW and SW Radiation ($0-1$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
{\bf CLDTOT} is the time-averaged total cloud fraction that has been filled by the Relaxed |
|
|
Arakawa/Schubert and Large-scale Convection schemes and will be used in the Longwave and Shortwave |
|
|
Radiation packages. |
|
|
For a complete description of cloud/radiative interactions, see Section \ref{sec:fizhi:radcloud}. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf CLDTOT} = F_{RAS} + F_{LS} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
where $F_{RAS}$ is the time-averaged cloud fraction due to sub-grid scale convection, and $F_{LS}$ is the |
|
|
time-averaged cloud fraction due to precipitating and non-precipitating large-scale moist processes. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 46) \underline {CLMOSW} Maximum Overlap cloud fraction used in SW Radiation ($0-1$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf CLMOSW} is the time-averaged maximum overlap cloud fraction that has been filled by the Relaxed |
|
|
Arakawa/Schubert Convection scheme and will be used in the Shortwave Radiation algorithm. These are |
|
|
convective clouds whose radiative characteristics are assumed to be correlated in the vertical. |
|
|
For a complete description of cloud/radiative interactions, see Section \ref{sec:fizhi:radcloud}. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf CLMOSW} = CLMO_{RAS,SW}(\lambda, \phi, level ) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 47) \underline {CLROSW} Random Overlap cloud fraction used in SW Radiation ($0-1$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf CLROSW} is the time-averaged random overlap cloud fraction that has been filled by the Relaxed |
|
|
Arakawa/Schubert and Large-scale Convection schemes and will be used in the Shortwave |
|
|
Radiation algorithm. These are |
|
|
convective and large-scale clouds whose radiative characteristics are not |
|
|
assumed to be correlated in the vertical. |
|
|
For a complete description of cloud/radiative interactions, see Section \ref{sec:fizhi:radcloud}. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf CLROSW} = CLRO_{RAS,Large Scale,SW}(\lambda, \phi, level ) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 48) \underline {RADSWT} Incident Shortwave radiation at the top of the atmosphere ($Watts/m^2$) } |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf RADSWT} = {\frac{S_0}{R_a^2}} \cdot cos \phi_z |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $S_0$, is the extra-terrestial solar contant, |
|
|
$R_a$ is the earth-sun distance in Astronomical Units, |
|
|
and $cos \phi_z$ is the cosine of the zenith angle. |
|
|
It should be noted that {\bf RADSWT}, as well as |
|
|
{\bf OSR} and {\bf OSRCLR}, |
|
|
are calculated at the top of the atmosphere (p=0 mb). However, the |
|
|
{\bf OLR} and {\bf OLRCLR} diagnostics are currently |
|
|
calculated at $p= p_{top}$ (0.0 mb for the GCM). |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 49) \underline {EVAP} Surface Evaporation ($mm/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The surface evaporation is a function of the gradient of moisture, the potential |
|
|
evapotranspiration fraction and the eddy exchange coefficient: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf EVAP} = \rho \beta K_{h} (q_{surface} - q_{Nrphys}) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where $\rho$ = the atmospheric density at the surface, $\beta$ is the fraction of |
|
|
the potential evapotranspiration actually evaporated ($\beta=1$ over oceans), $K_{h}$ is the |
|
|
turbulent eddy exchange coefficient for heat and moisture at the surface in $m/sec$ and |
|
|
$q{surface}$ and $q_{Nrphys}$ are the specific humidity at the surface (see diagnostic |
|
|
number 34) and at the bottom model level, respectively. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 50) \underline {DUDT} Total Zonal U-Wind Tendency ($m/sec/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf DUDT} is the total time-tendency of the Zonal U-Wind due to Hydrodynamic, Diabatic, |
|
|
and Analysis forcing. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf DUDT} = \pp{u}{t}_{Dynamics} + \pp{u}{t}_{Moist} + \pp{u}{t}_{Turbulence} + \pp{u}{t}_{Analysis} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 51) \underline {DVDT} Total Zonal V-Wind Tendency ($m/sec/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf DVDT} is the total time-tendency of the Meridional V-Wind due to Hydrodynamic, Diabatic, |
|
|
and Analysis forcing. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf DVDT} = \pp{v}{t}_{Dynamics} + \pp{v}{t}_{Moist} + \pp{v}{t}_{Turbulence} + \pp{v}{t}_{Analysis} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 52) \underline {DTDT} Total Temperature Tendency ($deg/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf DTDT} is the total time-tendency of Temperature due to Hydrodynamic, Diabatic, |
|
|
and Analysis forcing. |
|
|
\begin{eqnarray*} |
|
|
{\bf DTDT} & = & \pp{T}{t}_{Dynamics} + \pp{T}{t}_{Moist Processes} + \pp{T}{t}_{Shortwave Radiation} \\ |
|
|
& + & \pp{T}{t}_{Longwave Radiation} + \pp{T}{t}_{Turbulence} + \pp{T}{t}_{Analysis} |
|
|
\end{eqnarray*} |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 53) \underline {DQDT} Total Specific Humidity Tendency ($g/kg/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf DQDT} is the total time-tendency of Specific Humidity due to Hydrodynamic, Diabatic, |
|
|
and Analysis forcing. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf DQDT} = \pp{q}{t}_{Dynamics} + \pp{q}{t}_{Moist Processes} |
|
|
+ \pp{q}{t}_{Turbulence} + \pp{q}{t}_{Analysis} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 54) \underline {USTAR} Surface-Stress Velocity ($m/sec$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The surface stress velocity, or the friction velocity, is the wind speed at |
|
|
the surface layer top impeded by the surface drag: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf USTAR} = C_uW_s \hspace{1cm}where: \hspace{.2cm} |
|
|
C_u = {k \over {\psi_m} } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
$C_u$ is the non-dimensional surface drag coefficient (see diagnostic |
|
|
number 10), and $W_s$ is the surface wind speed (see diagnostic number 28). |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 55) \underline {Z0} Surface Roughness Length ($m$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
Over the land surface, the surface roughness length is interpolated to the local |
|
|
time from the monthly mean data of Dorman and Sellers (1989). Over the ocean, |
|
|
the roughness length is a function of the surface-stress velocity, $u_*$. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf Z0} = c_1u^3_* + c_2u^2_* + c_3u_* + c_4 + {c_5 \over {u_*}} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where the constants are chosen to interpolate between the reciprocal relation of |
|
|
Kondo(1975) for weak winds, and the piecewise linear relation of Large and Pond(1981) |
|
|
for moderate to large winds. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 56) \underline {FRQTRB} Frequency of Turbulence ($0-1$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The fraction of time when turbulence is present is defined as the fraction of |
|
|
time when the turbulent kinetic energy exceeds some minimum value, defined here |
|
|
to be $0.005 \hspace{.1cm}m^2/sec^2$. When this criterion is met, a counter is |
|
|
incremented. The fraction over the averaging interval is reported. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 57) \underline {PBL} Planetary Boundary Layer Depth ($mb$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The depth of the PBL is defined by the turbulence parameterization to be the |
|
|
depth at which the turbulent kinetic energy reduces to ten percent of its surface |
|
|
value. |
|
|
|
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf PBL} = P_{PBL} - P_{surface} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $P_{PBL}$ is the pressure in $mb$ at which the turbulent kinetic energy |
|
|
reaches one tenth of its surface value, and $P_s$ is the surface pressure. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 58) \underline {SWCLR} Clear sky Heating Rate due to Shortwave Radiation ($deg/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The net Shortwave heating rate is calculated as the vertical divergence of the |
|
|
net solar radiative fluxes. |
|
|
The clear-sky and cloudy-sky shortwave fluxes are calculated separately. |
|
|
For the clear-sky case, the shortwave fluxes and heating rates are computed with |
|
|
both CLMO (maximum overlap cloud fraction) and |
|
|
CLRO (random overlap cloud fraction) set to zero (see Section \ref{sec:fizhi:radcloud}). |
|
|
The shortwave routine is then called a second time, for the cloudy-sky case, with the |
|
|
true time-averaged cloud fractions CLMO |
|
|
and CLRO being used. In all cases, a normalized incident shortwave flux is used as |
|
|
input at the top of the atmosphere. |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The heating rate due to Shortwave Radiation under clear skies is defined as: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\pp{\rho c_p T}{t} = - {\partial \over \partial z} F(clear)_{SW}^{NET} \cdot {\rm RADSWT}, |
|
|
\] |
|
|
or |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf SWCLR} = \frac{g}{c_p } {\partial \over \partial p} F(clear)_{SW}^{NET}\cdot {\rm RADSWT} . |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $g$ is the accelation due to gravity, |
|
|
$c_p$ is the heat capacity of air at constant pressure, RADSWT is the true incident |
|
|
shortwave radiation at the top of the atmosphere (See Diagnostic \#48), and |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
F(clear)_{SW}^{Net} = F(clear)_{SW}^\uparrow - F(clear)_{SW}^\downarrow |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 59) \underline {OSR} Net upward Shortwave flux at the top of the model ($Watts/m^2$) } |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf OSR} = F_{SW,top}^{NET} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where top indicates the top of the first model layer used in the shortwave radiation |
|
|
routine. |
|
|
In the GCM, $p_{SW_{top}}$ = 0 mb. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 60) \underline {OSRCLR} Net upward clearsky Shortwave flux at the top of the model ($Watts/m^2$) } |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf OSRCLR} = F(clearsky)_{SW,top}^{NET} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where top indicates the top of the first model layer used in the shortwave radiation |
|
|
routine. |
|
|
In the GCM, $p_{SW_{top}}$ = 0 mb. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 61) \underline {CLDMAS} Convective Cloud Mass Flux ($kg/m^2$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The amount of cloud mass moved per RAS timestep from all convective clouds is written: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf CLDMAS} = \eta m_B |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where $\eta$ is the entrainment, normalized by the cloud base mass flux, and $m_B$ is |
|
|
the cloud base mass flux. $m_B$ and $\eta$ are defined explicitly in Section \ref{sec:fizhi:mc}, the |
|
|
description of the convective parameterization. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 62) \underline {UAVE} Time-Averaged Zonal U-Wind ($m/sec$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The diagnostic {\bf UAVE} is simply the time-averaged Zonal U-Wind over |
|
|
the {\bf NUAVE} output frequency. This is contrasted to the instantaneous |
|
|
Zonal U-Wind which is archived on the Prognostic Output data stream. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf UAVE} = u(\lambda, \phi, level , t) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
Note, {\bf UAVE} is computed and stored on the staggered C-grid. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 63) \underline {VAVE} Time-Averaged Meridional V-Wind ($m/sec$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The diagnostic {\bf VAVE} is simply the time-averaged Meridional V-Wind over |
|
|
the {\bf NVAVE} output frequency. This is contrasted to the instantaneous |
|
|
Meridional V-Wind which is archived on the Prognostic Output data stream. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf VAVE} = v(\lambda, \phi, level , t) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
Note, {\bf VAVE} is computed and stored on the staggered C-grid. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 64) \underline {TAVE} Time-Averaged Temperature ($Kelvin$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The diagnostic {\bf TAVE} is simply the time-averaged Temperature over |
|
|
the {\bf NTAVE} output frequency. This is contrasted to the instantaneous |
|
|
Temperature which is archived on the Prognostic Output data stream. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf TAVE} = T(\lambda, \phi, level , t) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 65) \underline {QAVE} Time-Averaged Specific Humidity ($g/kg$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The diagnostic {\bf QAVE} is simply the time-averaged Specific Humidity over |
|
|
the {\bf NQAVE} output frequency. This is contrasted to the instantaneous |
|
|
Specific Humidity which is archived on the Prognostic Output data stream. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf QAVE} = q(\lambda, \phi, level , t) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 66) \underline {PAVE} Time-Averaged Surface Pressure - PTOP ($mb$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The diagnostic {\bf PAVE} is simply the time-averaged Surface Pressure - PTOP over |
|
|
the {\bf NPAVE} output frequency. This is contrasted to the instantaneous |
|
|
Surface Pressure - PTOP which is archived on the Prognostic Output data stream. |
|
|
\begin{eqnarray*} |
|
|
{\bf PAVE} & = & \pi(\lambda, \phi, level , t) \\ |
|
|
& = & p_s(\lambda, \phi, level , t) - p_T |
|
|
\end{eqnarray*} |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 67) \underline {QQAVE} Time-Averaged Turbulent Kinetic Energy $(m/sec)^2$ } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The diagnostic {\bf QQAVE} is simply the time-averaged prognostic Turbulent Kinetic Energy |
|
|
produced by the GCM Turbulence parameterization over |
|
|
the {\bf NQQAVE} output frequency. This is contrasted to the instantaneous |
|
|
Turbulent Kinetic Energy which is archived on the Prognostic Output data stream. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf QQAVE} = qq(\lambda, \phi, level , t) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
Note, {\bf QQAVE} is computed and stored at the ``mass-point'' locations on the staggered C-grid. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 68) \underline {SWGCLR} Net downward clearsky Shortwave flux at the surface ($Watts/m^2$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
\begin{eqnarray*} |
|
|
{\bf SWGCLR} & = & F(clearsky)_{SW,Nrphys+1}^{Net} \\ |
|
|
& = & F(clearsky)_{SW,Nrphys+1}^\downarrow - F(clearsky)_{SW,Nrphys+1}^\uparrow |
|
|
\end{eqnarray*} |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
where Nrphys+1 indicates the lowest model edge-level, or $p = p_{surf}$. |
|
|
$F(clearsky){SW}^\downarrow$ is |
|
|
the downward clearsky Shortwave flux and $F(clearsky)_{SW}^\uparrow$ is |
|
|
the upward clearsky Shortwave flux. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 69) \underline {SDIAG1} User-Defined Surface Diagnostic-1 } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The GCM provides Users with a built-in mechanism for archiving user-defined |
|
|
diagnostics. The generic diagnostic array QDIAG located in COMMON /DIAG/, and the associated |
|
|
diagnostic counters and pointers located in COMMON /DIAGP/, |
|
|
must be accessable in order to use the user-defined diagnostics (see Section \ref{sec:diagnostics:diagover}). |
|
|
A convenient method for incorporating all necessary COMMON files is to |
|
|
include the GCM {\em vstate.com} file in the routine which employs the |
|
|
user-defined diagnostics. |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
In addition to enabling the user-defined diagnostic (ie., CALL SETDIAG(84)), the User must fill |
|
|
the QDIAG array with the desired quantity within the User's |
|
|
application program or within modified GCM subroutines, as well as increment |
|
|
the diagnostic counter at the time when the diagnostic is updated. |
|
|
The QDIAG location index for {\bf SDIAG1} and its corresponding counter is |
|
|
automatically defined as {\bf ISDIAG1} and {\bf NSDIAG1}, respectively, after the |
|
|
diagnostic has been enabled. |
|
|
The syntax for its use is given by |
|
|
\begin{verbatim} |
|
|
do j=1,jm |
|
|
do i=1,im |
|
|
qdiag(i,j,ISDIAG1) = qdiag(i,j,ISDIAG1) + ... |
|
|
enddo |
|
|
enddo |
|
|
|
|
|
NSDIAG1 = NSDIAG1 + 1 |
|
|
\end{verbatim} |
|
|
The diagnostics defined in this manner will automatically be archived by the output routines. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 70) \underline {SDIAG2} User-Defined Surface Diagnostic-2 } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The GCM provides Users with a built-in mechanism for archiving user-defined |
|
|
diagnostics. For a complete description refer to Diagnostic \#84. |
|
|
The syntax for using the surface SDIAG2 diagnostic is given by |
|
|
\begin{verbatim} |
|
|
do j=1,jm |
|
|
do i=1,im |
|
|
qdiag(i,j,ISDIAG2) = qdiag(i,j,ISDIAG2) + ... |
|
|
enddo |
|
|
enddo |
|
|
|
|
|
NSDIAG2 = NSDIAG2 + 1 |
|
|
\end{verbatim} |
|
|
The diagnostics defined in this manner will automatically be archived by the output routines. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 71) \underline {UDIAG1} User-Defined Upper-Air Diagnostic-1 } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The GCM provides Users with a built-in mechanism for archiving user-defined |
|
|
diagnostics. For a complete description refer to Diagnostic \#84. |
|
|
The syntax for using the upper-air UDIAG1 diagnostic is given by |
|
|
\begin{verbatim} |
|
|
do L=1,Nrphys |
|
|
do j=1,jm |
|
|
do i=1,im |
|
|
qdiag(i,j,IUDIAG1+L-1) = qdiag(i,j,IUDIAG1+L-1) + ... |
|
|
enddo |
|
|
enddo |
|
|
enddo |
|
|
|
|
|
NUDIAG1 = NUDIAG1 + 1 |
|
|
\end{verbatim} |
|
|
The diagnostics defined in this manner will automatically be archived by the |
|
|
output programs. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 72) \underline {UDIAG2} User-Defined Upper-Air Diagnostic-2 } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The GCM provides Users with a built-in mechanism for archiving user-defined |
|
|
diagnostics. For a complete description refer to Diagnostic \#84. |
|
|
The syntax for using the upper-air UDIAG2 diagnostic is given by |
|
|
\begin{verbatim} |
|
|
do L=1,Nrphys |
|
|
do j=1,jm |
|
|
do i=1,im |
|
|
qdiag(i,j,IUDIAG2+L-1) = qdiag(i,j,IUDIAG2+L-1) + ... |
|
|
enddo |
|
|
enddo |
|
|
enddo |
|
|
|
|
|
NUDIAG2 = NUDIAG2 + 1 |
|
|
\end{verbatim} |
|
|
The diagnostics defined in this manner will automatically be archived by the |
|
|
output programs. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 73) \underline {DIABU} Total Diabatic Zonal U-Wind Tendency ($m/sec/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf DIABU} is the total time-tendency of the Zonal U-Wind due to Diabatic processes |
|
|
and the Analysis forcing. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf DIABU} = \pp{u}{t}_{Moist} + \pp{u}{t}_{Turbulence} + \pp{u}{t}_{Analysis} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 74) \underline {DIABV} Total Diabatic Meridional V-Wind Tendency ($m/sec/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf DIABV} is the total time-tendency of the Meridional V-Wind due to Diabatic processes |
|
|
and the Analysis forcing. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf DIABV} = \pp{v}{t}_{Moist} + \pp{v}{t}_{Turbulence} + \pp{v}{t}_{Analysis} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 75) \underline {DIABT} Total Diabatic Temperature Tendency ($deg/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf DIABT} is the total time-tendency of Temperature due to Diabatic processes |
|
|
and the Analysis forcing. |
|
|
\begin{eqnarray*} |
|
|
{\bf DIABT} & = & \pp{T}{t}_{Moist Processes} + \pp{T}{t}_{Shortwave Radiation} \\ |
|
|
& + & \pp{T}{t}_{Longwave Radiation} + \pp{T}{t}_{Turbulence} + \pp{T}{t}_{Analysis} |
|
|
\end{eqnarray*} |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
If we define the time-tendency of Temperature due to Diabatic processes as |
|
|
\begin{eqnarray*} |
|
|
\pp{T}{t}_{Diabatic} & = & \pp{T}{t}_{Moist Processes} + \pp{T}{t}_{Shortwave Radiation} \\ |
|
|
& + & \pp{T}{t}_{Longwave Radiation} + \pp{T}{t}_{Turbulence} |
|
|
\end{eqnarray*} |
|
|
then, since there are no surface pressure changes due to Diabatic processes, we may write |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\pp{T}{t}_{Diabatic} = {p^\kappa \over \pi }\pp{\pi \theta}{t}_{Diabatic} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where $\theta = T/p^\kappa$. Thus, {\bf DIABT} may be written as |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf DIABT} = {p^\kappa \over \pi } \left( \pp{\pi \theta}{t}_{Diabatic} + \pp{\pi \theta}{t}_{Analysis} \right) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 76) \underline {DIABQ} Total Diabatic Specific Humidity Tendency ($g/kg/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf DIABQ} is the total time-tendency of Specific Humidity due to Diabatic processes |
|
|
and the Analysis forcing. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf DIABQ} = \pp{q}{t}_{Moist Processes} + \pp{q}{t}_{Turbulence} + \pp{q}{t}_{Analysis} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
If we define the time-tendency of Specific Humidity due to Diabatic processes as |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\pp{q}{t}_{Diabatic} = \pp{q}{t}_{Moist Processes} + \pp{q}{t}_{Turbulence} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
then, since there are no surface pressure changes due to Diabatic processes, we may write |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\pp{q}{t}_{Diabatic} = {1 \over \pi }\pp{\pi q}{t}_{Diabatic} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
Thus, {\bf DIABQ} may be written as |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf DIABQ} = {1 \over \pi } \left( \pp{\pi q}{t}_{Diabatic} + \pp{\pi q}{t}_{Analysis} \right) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 77) \underline {VINTUQ} Vertically Integrated Moisture Flux ($m/sec \cdot g/kg$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The vertically integrated moisture flux due to the zonal u-wind is obtained by integrating |
|
|
$u q$ over the depth of the atmosphere at each model timestep, |
|
|
and dividing by the total mass of the column. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf VINTUQ} = \frac{ \int_{surf}^{top} u q \rho dz } { \int_{surf}^{top} \rho dz } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
Using $\rho \delta z = -{\delta p \over g} = - {1 \over g} \delta p$, we have |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf VINTUQ} = { \int_0^1 u q dp } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 78) \underline {VINTVQ} Vertically Integrated Moisture Flux ($m/sec \cdot g/kg$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The vertically integrated moisture flux due to the meridional v-wind is obtained by integrating |
|
|
$v q$ over the depth of the atmosphere at each model timestep, |
|
|
and dividing by the total mass of the column. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf VINTVQ} = \frac{ \int_{surf}^{top} v q \rho dz } { \int_{surf}^{top} \rho dz } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
Using $\rho \delta z = -{\delta p \over g} = - {1 \over g} \delta p$, we have |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf VINTVQ} = { \int_0^1 v q dp } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 79) \underline {VINTUT} Vertically Integrated Heat Flux ($m/sec \cdot deg$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The vertically integrated heat flux due to the zonal u-wind is obtained by integrating |
|
|
$u T$ over the depth of the atmosphere at each model timestep, |
|
|
and dividing by the total mass of the column. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf VINTUT} = \frac{ \int_{surf}^{top} u T \rho dz } { \int_{surf}^{top} \rho dz } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
Or, |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf VINTUT} = { \int_0^1 u T dp } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 80) \underline {VINTVT} Vertically Integrated Heat Flux ($m/sec \cdot deg$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The vertically integrated heat flux due to the meridional v-wind is obtained by integrating |
|
|
$v T$ over the depth of the atmosphere at each model timestep, |
|
|
and dividing by the total mass of the column. |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf VINTVT} = \frac{ \int_{surf}^{top} v T \rho dz } { \int_{surf}^{top} \rho dz } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
Using $\rho \delta z = -{\delta p \over g} $, we have |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf VINTVT} = { \int_0^1 v T dp } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 81 \underline {CLDFRC} Total 2-Dimensional Cloud Fracton ($0-1$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
If we define the |
|
|
time-averaged random and maximum overlapped cloudiness as CLRO and |
|
|
CLMO respectively, then the probability of clear sky associated |
|
|
with random overlapped clouds at any level is (1-CLRO) while the probability of |
|
|
clear sky associated with maximum overlapped clouds at any level is (1-CLMO). |
|
|
The total clear sky probability is given by (1-CLRO)*(1-CLMO), thus |
|
|
the total cloud fraction at each level may be obtained by |
|
|
1-(1-CLRO)*(1-CLMO). |
|
|
|
|
|
At any given level, we may define the clear line-of-site probability by |
|
|
appropriately accounting for the maximum and random overlap |
|
|
cloudiness. The clear line-of-site probability is defined to be |
|
|
equal to the product of the clear line-of-site probabilities |
|
|
associated with random and maximum overlap cloudiness. The clear |
|
|
line-of-site probability $C(p,p^{\prime})$ associated with maximum overlap clouds, |
|
|
from the current pressure $p$ |
|
|
to the model top pressure, $p^{\prime} = p_{top}$, or the model surface pressure, $p^{\prime} = p_{surf}$, |
|
|
is simply 1.0 minus the largest maximum overlap cloud value along the |
|
|
line-of-site, ie. |
|
|
|
|
|
$$1-MAX_p^{p^{\prime}} \left( CLMO_p \right)$$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Thus, even in the time-averaged sense it is assumed that the |
|
|
maximum overlap clouds are correlated in the vertical. The clear |
|
|
line-of-site probability associated with random overlap clouds is |
|
|
defined to be the product of the clear sky probabilities at each |
|
|
level along the line-of-site, ie. |
|
|
|
|
|
$$\prod_{p}^{p^{\prime}} \left( 1-CLRO_p \right)$$ |
|
|
|
|
|
The total cloud fraction at a given level associated with a line- |
|
|
of-site calculation is given by |
|
|
|
|
|
$$1-\left( 1-MAX_p^{p^{\prime}} \left[ CLMO_p \right] \right) |
|
|
\prod_p^{p^{\prime}} \left( 1-CLRO_p \right)$$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The 2-dimensional net cloud fraction as seen from the top of the |
|
|
atmosphere is given by |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf CLDFRC} = 1-\left( 1-MAX_{l=l_1}^{Nrphys} \left[ CLMO_l \right] \right) |
|
|
\prod_{l=l_1}^{Nrphys} \left( 1-CLRO_l \right) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
For a complete description of cloud/radiative interactions, see Section \ref{sec:fizhi:radcloud}. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 82) \underline {QINT} Total Precipitable Water ($gm/cm^2$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The Total Precipitable Water is defined as the vertical integral of the specific humidity, |
|
|
given by: |
|
|
\begin{eqnarray*} |
|
|
{\bf QINT} & = & \int_{surf}^{top} \rho q dz \\ |
|
|
& = & {\pi \over g} \int_0^1 q dp |
|
|
\end{eqnarray*} |
|
|
where we have used the hydrostatic relation |
|
|
$\rho \delta z = -{\delta p \over g} $. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 83) \underline {U2M} Zonal U-Wind at 2 Meter Depth ($m/sec$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The u-wind at the 2-meter depth is determined from the similarity theory: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf U2M} = {u_* \over k} \psi_{m_{2m}} {u_{sl} \over {W_s}} = |
|
|
{ \psi_{m_{2m}} \over {\psi_{m_{sl}} }}u_{sl} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $\psi_m(2m)$ is the non-dimensional wind shear at two meters, and the subscript |
|
|
$sl$ refers to the height of the top of the surface layer. If the roughness height |
|
|
is above two meters, ${\bf U2M}$ is undefined. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 84) \underline {V2M} Meridional V-Wind at 2 Meter Depth ($m/sec$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The v-wind at the 2-meter depth is a determined from the similarity theory: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf V2M} = {u_* \over k} \psi_{m_{2m}} {v_{sl} \over {W_s}} = |
|
|
{ \psi_{m_{2m}} \over {\psi_{m_{sl}} }}v_{sl} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $\psi_m(2m)$ is the non-dimensional wind shear at two meters, and the subscript |
|
|
$sl$ refers to the height of the top of the surface layer. If the roughness height |
|
|
is above two meters, ${\bf V2M}$ is undefined. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 85) \underline {T2M} Temperature at 2 Meter Depth ($deg \hspace{.1cm} K$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The temperature at the 2-meter depth is a determined from the similarity theory: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf T2M} = P^{\kappa} ({\theta* \over k} ({\psi_{h_{2m}}+\psi_g}) + \theta_{surf} ) = |
|
|
P^{\kappa}(\theta_{surf} + { {\psi_{h_{2m}}+\psi_g} \over {{\psi_{h_{sl}}+\psi_g}} } |
|
|
(\theta_{sl} - \theta_{surf})) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\theta_* = - { (\overline{w^{\prime}\theta^{\prime}}) \over {u_*} } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $\psi_h(2m)$ is the non-dimensional temperature gradient at two meters, $\psi_g$ is |
|
|
the non-dimensional temperature gradient in the viscous sublayer, and the subscript |
|
|
$sl$ refers to the height of the top of the surface layer. If the roughness height |
|
|
is above two meters, ${\bf T2M}$ is undefined. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 86) \underline {Q2M} Specific Humidity at 2 Meter Depth ($g/kg$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The specific humidity at the 2-meter depth is determined from the similarity theory: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf Q2M} = P^{\kappa} ({q_* \over k} ({\psi_{h_{2m}}+\psi_g}) + q_{surf} ) = |
|
|
P^{\kappa}(q_{surf} + { {\psi_{h_{2m}}+\psi_g} \over {{\psi_{h_{sl}}+\psi_g}} } |
|
|
(q_{sl} - q_{surf})) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
q_* = - { (\overline{w^{\prime}q^{\prime}}) \over {u_*} } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $\psi_h(2m)$ is the non-dimensional temperature gradient at two meters, $\psi_g$ is |
|
|
the non-dimensional temperature gradient in the viscous sublayer, and the subscript |
|
|
$sl$ refers to the height of the top of the surface layer. If the roughness height |
|
|
is above two meters, ${\bf Q2M}$ is undefined. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 87) \underline {U10M} Zonal U-Wind at 10 Meter Depth ($m/sec$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The u-wind at the 10-meter depth is an interpolation between the surface wind |
|
|
and the model lowest level wind using the ratio of the non-dimensional wind shear |
|
|
at the two levels: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf U10M} = {u_* \over k} \psi_{m_{10m}} {u_{sl} \over {W_s}} = |
|
|
{ \psi_{m_{10m}} \over {\psi_{m_{sl}} }}u_{sl} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $\psi_m(10m)$ is the non-dimensional wind shear at ten meters, and the subscript |
|
|
$sl$ refers to the height of the top of the surface layer. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 88) \underline {V10M} Meridional V-Wind at 10 Meter Depth ($m/sec$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The v-wind at the 10-meter depth is an interpolation between the surface wind |
|
|
and the model lowest level wind using the ratio of the non-dimensional wind shear |
|
|
at the two levels: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf V10M} = {u_* \over k} \psi_{m_{10m}} {v_{sl} \over {W_s}} = |
|
|
{ \psi_{m_{10m}} \over {\psi_{m_{sl}} }}v_{sl} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $\psi_m(10m)$ is the non-dimensional wind shear at ten meters, and the subscript |
|
|
$sl$ refers to the height of the top of the surface layer. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 89) \underline {T10M} Temperature at 10 Meter Depth ($deg \hspace{.1cm} K$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The temperature at the 10-meter depth is an interpolation between the surface potential |
|
|
temperature and the model lowest level potential temperature using the ratio of the |
|
|
non-dimensional temperature gradient at the two levels: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf T10M} = P^{\kappa} ({\theta* \over k} ({\psi_{h_{10m}}+\psi_g}) + \theta_{surf} ) = |
|
|
P^{\kappa}(\theta_{surf} + { {\psi_{h_{10m}}+\psi_g} \over {{\psi_{h_{sl}}+\psi_g}} } |
|
|
(\theta_{sl} - \theta_{surf})) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\theta_* = - { (\overline{w^{\prime}\theta^{\prime}}) \over {u_*} } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $\psi_h(10m)$ is the non-dimensional temperature gradient at two meters, $\psi_g$ is |
|
|
the non-dimensional temperature gradient in the viscous sublayer, and the subscript |
|
|
$sl$ refers to the height of the top of the surface layer. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 90) \underline {Q10M} Specific Humidity at 10 Meter Depth ($g/kg$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
The specific humidity at the 10-meter depth is an interpolation between the surface specific |
|
|
humidity and the model lowest level specific humidity using the ratio of the |
|
|
non-dimensional temperature gradient at the two levels: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf Q10M} = P^{\kappa} ({q_* \over k} ({\psi_{h_{10m}}+\psi_g}) + q_{surf} ) = |
|
|
P^{\kappa}(q_{surf} + { {\psi_{h_{10m}}+\psi_g} \over {{\psi_{h_{sl}}+\psi_g}} } |
|
|
(q_{sl} - q_{surf})) |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
q_* = - { (\overline{w^{\prime}q^{\prime}}) \over {u_*} } |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $\psi_h(10m)$ is the non-dimensional temperature gradient at two meters, $\psi_g$ is |
|
|
the non-dimensional temperature gradient in the viscous sublayer, and the subscript |
|
|
$sl$ refers to the height of the top of the surface layer. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 91) \underline {DTRAIN} Cloud Detrainment Mass Flux ($kg/m^2$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of cloud mass moved per RAS timestep at the cloud detrainment level is written: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf DTRAIN} = \eta_{r_D}m_B |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
where $r_D$ is the detrainment level, |
|
|
$m_B$ is the cloud base mass flux, and $\eta$ |
|
|
is the entrainment, defined in Section \ref{sec:fizhi:mc}. |
|
|
\\ |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
{\bf 92) \underline {QFILL} Filling of negative Specific Humidity ($g/kg/day$) } |
|
|
|
|
|
\noindent |
|
|
Due to computational errors associated with the numerical scheme used for |
|
|
the advection of moisture, negative values of specific humidity may be generated. The |
|
|
specific humidity is checked for negative values after every dynamics timestep. If negative |
|
|
values have been produced, a filling algorithm is invoked which redistributes moisture from |
|
|
below. Diagnostic {\bf QFILL} is equal to the net filling needed |
|
|
to eliminate negative specific humidity, scaled to a per-day rate: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
{\bf QFILL} = q^{n+1}_{final} - q^{n+1}_{initial} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
where |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
q^{n+1} = (\pi q)^{n+1} / \pi^{n+1} |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
826 |
\subsection{Dos and Donts} |
\subsection{Dos and Donts} |
827 |
|
|
828 |
\subsection{Diagnostics Reference} |
\subsection{Diagnostics Reference} |