s_overview/text/hs_zave_u_figure.tex

\begin{rawhtml}MITGCM_INSERT_FIGURE_BEGIN hs_zave_u\end{rawhtml}
\begin{figure}
 \begin{center}
   \includegraphics*[width=.9\textwidth]{s_overview/figs/u_cube.ps}
   \includegraphics*[width=.9\textwidth]{s_overview/figs/u_latlon.ps}
 \end{center}
\caption{
Five year mean, zonally averaged zonal flow for
latitude-longitude simulation (bottom) and cube-sphere simulation(top) using
Held-Suarez forcing. Note the difference in the solutions over the pole -
the cubed sphere is superior.
}
\label{fig:hs_zave_u}
\end{figure}
\begin{rawhtml}MITGCM_INSERT_FIGURE_END \end{rawhtml}
1	cnh	1.6	\begin{rawhtml}MITGCM_INSERT_FIGURE_BEGIN hs_zave_u\end{rawhtml}
2	cnh	1.1	\begin{figure}
3			\begin{center}
4	jmc	1.7	\includegraphics*[width=.9\textwidth]{s_overview/figs/u_cube.ps}
5			\includegraphics*[width=.9\textwidth]{s_overview/figs/u_latlon.ps}
6	cnh	1.1	\end{center}
7	cnh	1.5	\caption{
8			Five year mean, zonally averaged zonal flow for
9			latitude-longitude simulation (bottom) and cube-sphere simulation(top) using
10			Held-Suarez forcing. Note the difference in the solutions over the pole -
11			the cubed sphere is superior.
12			}
13	cnh	1.1	\label{fig:hs_zave_u}
14			\end{figure}
15	cnh	1.6	\begin{rawhtml}MITGCM_INSERT_FIGURE_END \end{rawhtml}