1 |
% $Header$ |
% $Header$ |
2 |
% $Name$ |
% $Name$ |
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
Author: Patrick Heimbach |
5 |
|
|
6 |
{\sf Automatic differentiation} (AD), also referred to as algorithmic |
{\sf Automatic differentiation} (AD), also referred to as algorithmic |
7 |
(or, more loosely, computational) differentiation, involves |
(or, more loosely, computational) differentiation, involves |
8 |
automatically deriving code to calculate |
automatically deriving code to calculate partial derivatives from an |
9 |
partial derivatives from an existing fully non-linear prognostic code. |
existing fully non-linear prognostic code. (see \cite{gri:00}). A |
10 |
(see \cite{gri:00}). |
software tool is used that parses and transforms source files |
11 |
A software tool is used that parses and transforms source files |
according to a set of linguistic and mathematical rules. AD tools are |
12 |
according to a set of linguistic and mathematical rules. |
like source-to-source translators in that they parse a program code as |
13 |
AD tools are like source-to-source translators in that |
input and produce a new program code as output |
14 |
they parse a program code as input and produce a new program code |
(we restrict our discussion to source-to-source tools, ignoring |
15 |
as output. |
operator-overloading tools). However, unlike a |
16 |
However, unlike a pure source-to-source translation, the output program |
pure source-to-source translation, the output program represents a new |
17 |
represents a new algorithm, such as the evaluation of the |
algorithm, such as the evaluation of the Jacobian, the Hessian, or |
18 |
Jacobian, the Hessian, or higher derivative operators. |
higher derivative operators. In principle, a variety of derived |
19 |
In principle, a variety of derived algorithms |
algorithms can be generated automatically in this way. |
20 |
can be generated automatically in this way. |
|
21 |
|
MITgcm has been adapted for use with the Tangent linear and Adjoint |
22 |
The MITGCM has been adapted for use with the |
Model Compiler (TAMC) and its successor TAF (Transformation of |
23 |
Tangent linear and Adjoint Model Compiler (TAMC) and its successor TAF |
Algorithms in Fortran), developed by Ralf Giering (\cite{gie-kam:98}, |
24 |
(Transformation of Algorithms in Fortran), developed |
\cite{gie:99,gie:00}). The first application of the adjoint of MITgcm |
25 |
by Ralf Giering (\cite{gie-kam:98}, \cite{gie:99,gie:00}). |
for sensitivity studies has been published by \cite{maro-eta:99}. |
26 |
The first application of the adjoint of the MITGCM for sensitivity |
\cite{stam-etal:97,stam-etal:02} use MITgcm and its adjoint for ocean |
27 |
studies has been published by \cite{maro-eta:99}. |
state estimation studies. In the following we shall refer to TAMC and |
28 |
\cite{sta-eta:97,sta-eta:01} use the MITGCM and its adjoint |
TAF synonymously, except were explicitly stated otherwise. |
29 |
for ocean state estimation studies. |
|
30 |
In the following we shall refer to TAMC and TAF synonymously, |
As of mid-2007 we are also able to generate fairly efficient |
31 |
except were explicitly stated otherwise. |
adjoint code of the MITgcm using a new, open-source AD tool, |
32 |
|
called OpenAD (see \cite{naum-etal:06,utke-etal:08}. |
33 |
TAMC exploits the chain rule for computing the first |
This enables us for the first time to compare adjoint models |
34 |
derivative of a function with |
generated from different AD tools, providing an additional |
35 |
respect to a set of input variables. |
accuracy check, complementary to finite-difference gradient checks. |
36 |
Treating a given forward code as a composition of operations -- |
OpenAD and its application to MITgcm is described in detail |
37 |
each line representing a compositional element, the chain rule is |
in section \ref{sec_ad_openad}. |
38 |
rigorously applied to the code, line by line. The resulting |
|
39 |
tangent linear or adjoint code, |
The AD tool exploits the chain rule for computing the first derivative of a |
40 |
then, may be thought of as the composition in |
function with respect to a set of input variables. Treating a given |
41 |
forward or reverse order, respectively, of the |
forward code as a composition of operations -- each line representing |
42 |
Jacobian matrices of the forward code's compositional elements. |
a compositional element, the chain rule is rigorously applied to the |
43 |
|
code, line by line. The resulting tangent linear or adjoint code, |
44 |
|
then, may be thought of as the composition in forward or reverse |
45 |
|
order, respectively, of the Jacobian matrices of the forward code's |
46 |
|
compositional elements. |
47 |
|
|
48 |
%********************************************************************** |
%********************************************************************** |
49 |
\section{Some basic algebra} |
\section{Some basic algebra} |
50 |
\label{sec_ad_algebra} |
\label{sec_ad_algebra} |
51 |
|
\begin{rawhtml} |
52 |
|
<!-- CMIREDIR:sec_ad_algebra: --> |
53 |
|
\end{rawhtml} |
54 |
%********************************************************************** |
%********************************************************************** |
55 |
|
|
56 |
Let $ \cal{M} $ be a general nonlinear, model, i.e. a |
Let $ \cal{M} $ be a general nonlinear, model, i.e. a |
685 |
%********************************************************************** |
%********************************************************************** |
686 |
\section{TLM and ADM generation in general} |
\section{TLM and ADM generation in general} |
687 |
\label{sec_ad_setup_gen} |
\label{sec_ad_setup_gen} |
688 |
|
\begin{rawhtml} |
689 |
|
<!-- CMIREDIR:sec_ad_setup_gen: --> |
690 |
|
\end{rawhtml} |
691 |
%********************************************************************** |
%********************************************************************** |
692 |
|
|
693 |
In this section we describe in a general fashion |
In this section we describe in a general fashion |
694 |
the parts of the code that are relevant for automatic |
the parts of the code that are relevant for automatic |
695 |
differentiation using the software tool TAMC. |
differentiation using the software tool TAF. |
696 |
|
Modifications to use OpenAD are described in \ref{sec_ad_openad}. |
697 |
|
|
698 |
\input{part5/doc_ad_the_model} |
\input{part5/doc_ad_the_model} |
699 |
|
|
700 |
The basic flow is depicted in \ref{fig:adthemodel}. |
The basic flow is depicted in \ref{fig:adthemodel}. |
701 |
If the option {\tt ALLOW\_AUTODIFF\_TAMC} is defined, the driver routine |
If CPP option \texttt{ALLOW\_AUTODIFF\_TAMC} is defined, |
702 |
|
the driver routine |
703 |
{\it the\_model\_main}, instead of calling {\it the\_main\_loop}, |
{\it the\_model\_main}, instead of calling {\it the\_main\_loop}, |
704 |
invokes the adjoint of this routine, {\it adthe\_main\_loop}, |
invokes the adjoint of this routine, {\it adthe\_main\_loop} |
705 |
which is the toplevel routine in terms of reverse mode computation. |
(case \texttt{\#define ALLOW\_ADJOINT\_RUN}), or |
706 |
The routine {\it adthe\_main\_loop} has been generated by TAMC. |
the tangent linear of this routine {\it g\_the\_main\_loop} |
707 |
It contains both the forward integration of the full model, |
(case \texttt{\#define ALLOW\_TANGENTLINEAR\_RUN}), |
708 |
|
which are the toplevel routines in terms of automatic differentiation. |
709 |
|
The routines {\it adthe\_main\_loop} or {\it g\_the\_main\_loop} |
710 |
|
are generated by TAF. |
711 |
|
It contains both the forward integration of the full model, the |
712 |
|
cost function calculation, |
713 |
any additional storing that is required for efficient checkpointing, |
any additional storing that is required for efficient checkpointing, |
714 |
and the reverse integration of the adjoint model. |
and the reverse integration of the adjoint model. |
715 |
The structure of {\it adthe\_main\_loop} has been strongly |
|
716 |
simplified for clarification; in particular, no checkpointing |
[DESCRIBE IN A SEPARATE SECTION THE WORKING OF THE TLM] |
717 |
|
|
718 |
|
In Fig. \ref{fig:adthemodel} |
719 |
|
the structure of {\it adthe\_main\_loop} has been strongly |
720 |
|
simplified to focus on the essentials; in particular, no checkpointing |
721 |
procedures are shown here. |
procedures are shown here. |
722 |
Prior to the call of {\it adthe\_main\_loop}, the routine |
Prior to the call of {\it adthe\_main\_loop}, the routine |
723 |
{\it ctrl\_unpack} is invoked to unpack the control vector |
{\it ctrl\_unpack} is invoked to unpack the control vector |
732 |
the gradient has been computed via the adjoint |
the gradient has been computed via the adjoint |
733 |
(cf. Section \ref{section_grdchk}). |
(cf. Section \ref{section_grdchk}). |
734 |
|
|
735 |
|
%------------------------------------------------------------------ |
736 |
|
|
737 |
|
\subsection{General setup |
738 |
|
\label{section_ad_setup}} |
739 |
|
|
740 |
|
In order to configure AD-related setups the following packages need |
741 |
|
to be enabled: |
742 |
|
{\it |
743 |
|
\begin{table}[h!] |
744 |
|
\begin{tabular}{l} |
745 |
|
autodiff \\ |
746 |
|
ctrl \\ |
747 |
|
cost \\ |
748 |
|
grdchk \\ |
749 |
|
\end{tabular} |
750 |
|
\end{table} |
751 |
|
} |
752 |
|
The packages are enabled by adding them to your experiment-specific |
753 |
|
configuration file |
754 |
|
{\it packages.conf} (see Section ???). |
755 |
|
|
756 |
|
The following AD-specific CPP option files need to be customized: |
757 |
|
% |
758 |
|
\begin{itemize} |
759 |
|
% |
760 |
|
\item {\it ECCO\_CPPOPTIONS.h} \\ |
761 |
|
This header file collects CPP options for the packages |
762 |
|
{\it autodiff, cost, ctrl} as well as AD-unrelated options for |
763 |
|
the external forcing package {\it exf}. |
764 |
|
\footnote{NOTE: These options are not set in their package-specific |
765 |
|
headers such as {\it COST\_CPPOPTIONS.h}, but are instead collected |
766 |
|
in the single header file {\it ECCO\_CPPOPTIONS.h}. |
767 |
|
The package-specific header files serve as simple |
768 |
|
placeholders at this point.} |
769 |
|
% |
770 |
|
\item {\it tamc.h} \\ |
771 |
|
This header configures the splitting of the time stepping loop |
772 |
|
w.r.t. the 3-level checkpointing (see section ???). |
773 |
|
|
774 |
|
% |
775 |
|
\end{itemize} |
776 |
|
|
777 |
|
%------------------------------------------------------------------ |
778 |
|
|
779 |
|
\subsection{Building the AD code using TAF |
780 |
|
\label{section_ad_build}} |
781 |
|
|
782 |
|
The build process of an AD code is very similar to building |
783 |
|
the forward model. However, depending on which AD code one wishes |
784 |
|
to generate, and on which AD tool is available (TAF or TAMC), |
785 |
|
the following {\tt make} targets are available: |
786 |
|
|
787 |
|
\begin{table}[h!] |
788 |
|
{\footnotesize |
789 |
|
\begin{tabular}{|ccll|} |
790 |
|
\hline |
791 |
|
~ & {\it AD-target} & {\it output} & {\it description} \\ |
792 |
|
\hline |
793 |
|
\hline |
794 |
|
(1) & {\tt <MODE><TOOL>only} & {\tt <MODE>\_<TOOL>\_output.f} & |
795 |
|
generates code for $<$MODE$>$ using $<$TOOL$>$ \\ |
796 |
|
~ & ~ & ~ & no {\tt make} dependencies on {\tt .F .h} \\ |
797 |
|
~ & ~ & ~ & useful for compiling on remote platforms \\ |
798 |
|
\hline |
799 |
|
(2) & {\tt <MODE><TOOL>} & {\tt <MODE>\_<TOOL>\_output.f} & |
800 |
|
generates code for $<$MODE$>$ using $<$TOOL$>$ \\ |
801 |
|
~ & ~ & ~ & includes {\tt make} dependencies on {\tt .F .h} \\ |
802 |
|
~ & ~ & ~ & i.e. input for $<$TOOL$>$ may be re-generated \\ |
803 |
|
\hline |
804 |
|
(3) & {\tt <MODE>all} & {\tt mitgcmuv\_<MODE>} & |
805 |
|
generates code for $<$MODE$>$ using $<$TOOL$>$ \\ |
806 |
|
~ & ~ & ~ & and compiles all code \\ |
807 |
|
~ & ~ & ~ & (use of TAF is set as default) \\ |
808 |
|
\hline |
809 |
|
\end{tabular} |
810 |
|
} |
811 |
|
\end{table} |
812 |
|
% |
813 |
|
Here, the following placeholders are used |
814 |
|
% |
815 |
|
\begin{itemize} |
816 |
|
% |
817 |
|
\item $<$TOOL$>$ |
818 |
|
% |
819 |
|
\begin{itemize} |
820 |
|
% |
821 |
|
\item {\tt TAF} |
822 |
|
\item {\tt TAMC} |
823 |
|
% |
824 |
|
\end{itemize} |
825 |
|
% |
826 |
|
\item $<$MODE$>$ |
827 |
|
% |
828 |
|
\begin{itemize} |
829 |
|
% |
830 |
|
\item {\tt ad} generates the adjoint model (ADM) |
831 |
|
\item {\tt ftl} generates the tangent linear model (TLM) |
832 |
|
\item {\tt svd} generates both ADM and TLM for \\ |
833 |
|
singular value decomposition (SVD) type calculations |
834 |
|
% |
835 |
|
\end{itemize} |
836 |
|
% |
837 |
|
\end{itemize} |
838 |
|
|
839 |
|
For example, to generate the adjoint model using TAF after routines ({\tt .F}) |
840 |
|
or headers ({\tt .h}) have been modified, but without compilation, |
841 |
|
type {\tt make adtaf}; |
842 |
|
or, to generate the tangent linear model using TAMC without |
843 |
|
re-generating the input code, type {\tt make ftltamconly}. |
844 |
|
|
845 |
|
|
846 |
|
A typical full build process to generate the ADM via TAF would |
847 |
|
look like follows: |
848 |
|
\begin{verbatim} |
849 |
|
% mkdir build |
850 |
|
% cd build |
851 |
|
% ../../../tools/genmake2 -mods=../code_ad |
852 |
|
% make depend |
853 |
|
% make adall |
854 |
|
\end{verbatim} |
855 |
|
|
856 |
|
%------------------------------------------------------------------ |
857 |
|
|
858 |
|
\subsection{The AD build process in detail |
859 |
|
\label{section_ad_build_detail}} |
860 |
|
|
861 |
|
The {\tt make <MODE>all} target consists of the following procedures: |
862 |
|
|
863 |
|
\begin{enumerate} |
864 |
|
% |
865 |
|
\item |
866 |
|
A header file {\tt AD\_CONFIG.h} is generated which contains a CPP option |
867 |
|
on which code ought to be generated. Depending on the {\tt make} target, |
868 |
|
the contents is one of the following: |
869 |
|
\begin{itemize} |
870 |
|
\item |
871 |
|
{\tt \#define ALLOW\_ADJOINT\_RUN} |
872 |
|
\item |
873 |
|
{\tt \#define ALLOW\_TANGENTLINEAR\_RUN} |
874 |
|
\item |
875 |
|
{\tt \#define ALLOW\_ECCO\_OPTIMIZATION} |
876 |
|
\end{itemize} |
877 |
|
% |
878 |
|
\item |
879 |
|
A single file {\tt <MODE>\_input\_code.f} is concatenated |
880 |
|
consisting of all {\tt .f} files that are part of the list {\bf AD\_FILES} |
881 |
|
and all {\tt .flow} files that are part of the list {\bf AD\_FLOW\_FILES}. |
882 |
|
% |
883 |
|
\item |
884 |
|
The AD tool is invoked with the {\tt <MODE>\_<TOOL>\_FLAGS}. |
885 |
|
The default AD tool flags in {\tt genmake2} can be overrwritten by |
886 |
|
an {\tt adjoint\_options} file (similar to the platform-specific |
887 |
|
{\tt build\_options}, see Section ???. |
888 |
|
The AD tool writes the resulting AD code into the file |
889 |
|
{\tt <MODE>\_input\_code\_ad.f} |
890 |
|
% |
891 |
|
\item |
892 |
|
A short sed script {\tt adjoint\_sed} is applied to |
893 |
|
{\tt <MODE>\_input\_code\_ad.f} |
894 |
|
to reinstate {\bf myThid} into the CALL argument list of active file I/O. |
895 |
|
The result is written to file {\tt <MODE>\_<TOOL>\_output.f}. |
896 |
|
% |
897 |
|
\item |
898 |
|
All routines are compiled and an executable is generated |
899 |
|
(see Table ???). |
900 |
|
% |
901 |
|
\end{enumerate} |
902 |
|
|
903 |
|
\subsubsection{The list AD\_FILES and {\tt .list} files} |
904 |
|
|
905 |
|
Not all routines are presented to the AD tool. |
906 |
|
Routines typically hidden are diagnostics routines which |
907 |
|
do not influence the cost function, but may create |
908 |
|
artificial flow dependencies such as I/O of active variables. |
909 |
|
|
910 |
|
{\tt genmake2} generates a list (or variable) {\bf AD\_FILES} |
911 |
|
which contains all routines that are shown to the AD tool. |
912 |
|
This list is put together from all files with suffix {\tt .list} |
913 |
|
that {\tt genmake2} finds in its search directories. |
914 |
|
The list file for the core MITgcm routines is in {\tt model/src/} |
915 |
|
is called {\tt model\_ad\_diff.list}. |
916 |
|
Note that no wrapper routine is shown to TAF. These are either |
917 |
|
not visible at all to the AD code, or hand-written AD code |
918 |
|
is available (see next section). |
919 |
|
|
920 |
|
Each package directory contains its package-specific |
921 |
|
list file {\tt <PKG>\_ad\_diff.list}. For example, |
922 |
|
{\tt pkg/ptracers/} contains the file {\tt ptracers\_ad\_diff.list}. |
923 |
|
Thus, enabling a package will automatically extend the |
924 |
|
{\bf AD\_FILES} list of {\tt genmake2} to incorporate the |
925 |
|
package-specific routines. |
926 |
|
Note that you will need to regenerate the {\tt Makefile} if |
927 |
|
you enable a package (e.g. by adding it to {\tt packages.conf}) |
928 |
|
and a {\tt Makefile} already exists. |
929 |
|
|
930 |
|
\subsubsection{The list AD\_FLOW\_FILES and {\tt .flow} files} |
931 |
|
|
932 |
|
TAMC and TAF can evaluate user-specified directives |
933 |
|
that start with a specific syntax ({\tt CADJ}, {\tt C\$TAF}, {\tt !\$TAF}). |
934 |
|
The main categories of directives are STORE directives and |
935 |
|
FLOW directives. Here, we are concerned with flow directives, |
936 |
|
store directives are treated elsewhere. |
937 |
|
|
938 |
|
Flow directives enable the AD tool to evaluate how it should treat |
939 |
|
routines that are 'hidden' by the user, i.e. routines which are |
940 |
|
not contained in the {\bf AD\_FILES} list (see previous section), |
941 |
|
but which are called in part of the code that the AD tool does see. |
942 |
|
The flow directive tell the AD tool |
943 |
|
% |
944 |
|
\begin{itemize} |
945 |
|
% |
946 |
|
\item which subroutine arguments are input/output |
947 |
|
\item which subroutine arguments are active |
948 |
|
\item which subroutine arguments are required to compute the cost |
949 |
|
\item which subroutine arguments are dependent |
950 |
|
% |
951 |
|
\end{itemize} |
952 |
|
% |
953 |
|
The syntax for the flow directives can be found in the |
954 |
|
AD tool manuals. |
955 |
|
|
956 |
|
{\tt genmake2} generates a list (or variable) {\bf AD\_FLOW\_FILES} |
957 |
|
which contains all files with suffix{\tt .flow} that it finds |
958 |
|
in its search directories. |
959 |
|
The flow directives for the core MITgcm routines of |
960 |
|
{\tt eesupp/src/} and {\tt model/src/} |
961 |
|
reside in {\tt pkg/autodiff/}. |
962 |
|
This directory also contains hand-written adjoint code |
963 |
|
for the MITgcm WRAPPER (section \ref{chap:sarch}). |
964 |
|
|
965 |
|
Flow directives for package-specific routines are contained in |
966 |
|
the corresponding package directories in the file |
967 |
|
{\tt <PKG>\_ad.flow}, e.g. ptracers-specific directives are in |
968 |
|
{\tt ptracers\_ad.flow}. |
969 |
|
|
970 |
|
\subsubsection{Store directives for 3-level checkpointing} |
971 |
|
|
972 |
|
The storing that is required at each period of the |
973 |
|
3-level checkpointing is controled by three |
974 |
|
top-level headers. |
975 |
|
|
976 |
|
\begin{verbatim} |
977 |
|
do ilev_3 = 1, nchklev_3 |
978 |
|
# include ``checkpoint_lev3.h'' |
979 |
|
do ilev_2 = 1, nchklev_2 |
980 |
|
# include ``checkpoint_lev2.h'' |
981 |
|
do ilev_1 = 1, nchklev_1 |
982 |
|
# include ``checkpoint_lev1.h'' |
983 |
|
|
984 |
|
... |
985 |
|
|
986 |
|
end do |
987 |
|
end do |
988 |
|
end do |
989 |
|
\end{verbatim} |
990 |
|
|
991 |
|
All files {\tt checkpoint\_lev?.h} are contained in directory |
992 |
|
{\tt pkg/autodiff/}. |
993 |
|
|
994 |
|
|
995 |
|
\subsubsection{Changing the default AD tool flags: ad\_options files} |
996 |
|
|
997 |
|
|
998 |
|
\subsubsection{Hand-written adjoint code} |
999 |
|
|
1000 |
|
%------------------------------------------------------------------ |
1001 |
|
|
1002 |
\subsection{The cost function (dependent variable) |
\subsection{The cost function (dependent variable) |
1003 |
\label{section_cost}} |
\label{section_cost}} |
1004 |
|
|
1016 |
|
|
1017 |
\input{part5/doc_cost_flow} |
\input{part5/doc_cost_flow} |
1018 |
|
|
1019 |
\subsubsection{genmake and CPP options} |
\subsubsection{Enabling the package} |
1020 |
% |
|
|
\begin{itemize} |
|
|
% |
|
|
\item |
|
1021 |
\fbox{ |
\fbox{ |
1022 |
\begin{minipage}{12cm} |
\begin{minipage}{12cm} |
1023 |
{\it genmake}, {\it CPP\_OPTIONS.h}, {\it ECCO\_CPPOPTIONS.h} |
{\it packages.conf}, {\it ECCO\_CPPOPTIONS.h} |
1024 |
\end{minipage} |
\end{minipage} |
1025 |
} |
} |
1026 |
\end{itemize} |
\begin{itemize} |
|
% |
|
|
The directory {\it pkg/cost} can be included to the |
|
|
compile list in 3 different ways (cf. Section \ref{???}): |
|
1027 |
% |
% |
1028 |
\begin{enumerate} |
\item |
1029 |
|
The package is enabled by adding {\it cost} to your file {\it packages.conf} |
1030 |
|
(see Section ???) |
1031 |
% |
% |
1032 |
\item {\it genmake}: \\ |
\item |
1033 |
Change the default settings in the file {\it genmake} by adding |
|
1034 |
{\bf cost} to the {\bf enable} list (not recommended). |
|
1035 |
% |
\end{itemize} |
|
\item {\it .genmakerc}: \\ |
|
|
Customize the settings of {\bf enable}, {\bf disable} which are |
|
|
appropriate for your experiment in the file {\it .genmakerc} |
|
|
and add the file to your compile directory. |
|
|
% |
|
|
\item genmake-options: \\ |
|
|
Call {\it genmake} with the option |
|
|
{\tt genmake -enable=cost}. |
|
1036 |
% |
% |
1037 |
\end{enumerate} |
|
1038 |
N.B.: In general the following packages ought to be enabled |
N.B.: In general the following packages ought to be enabled |
1039 |
simultaneously: {\it autodiff, cost, ctrl}. |
simultaneously: {\it autodiff, cost, ctrl}. |
1040 |
The basic CPP option to enable the cost function is {\bf ALLOW\_COST}. |
The basic CPP option to enable the cost function is {\bf ALLOW\_COST}. |
1129 |
\end{equation} |
\end{equation} |
1130 |
% |
% |
1131 |
The total cost function {\bf fc} will be the |
The total cost function {\bf fc} will be the |
1132 |
'dependent' variable in the argument list for TAMC, i.e. |
'dependent' variable in the argument list for TAF, i.e. |
1133 |
\begin{verbatim} |
\begin{verbatim} |
1134 |
tamc -output 'fc' ... |
taf -output 'fc' ... |
1135 |
\end{verbatim} |
\end{verbatim} |
1136 |
|
|
1137 |
%%%% \end{document} |
%%%% \end{document} |
1214 |
\\ |
\\ |
1215 |
% |
% |
1216 |
Two important issues related to the handling of the control |
Two important issues related to the handling of the control |
1217 |
variables in the MITGCM need to be addressed. |
variables in MITgcm need to be addressed. |
1218 |
First, in order to save memory, the control variable arrays |
First, in order to save memory, the control variable arrays |
1219 |
are not kept in memory, but rather read from file and added |
are not kept in memory, but rather read from file and added |
1220 |
to the initial fields during the model initialization phase. |
to the initial fields during the model initialization phase. |
1246 |
% |
% |
1247 |
The dependency flow for differentiation w.r.t. the controls |
The dependency flow for differentiation w.r.t. the controls |
1248 |
starts with adding a perturbation onto the input variable, |
starts with adding a perturbation onto the input variable, |
1249 |
thus defining the independent or control variables for TAMC. |
thus defining the independent or control variables for TAF. |
1250 |
Three types of controls may be considered: |
Three types of controls may be considered: |
1251 |
% |
% |
1252 |
\begin{itemize} |
\begin{itemize} |
1279 |
holding the perturbation. In the case of a simple |
holding the perturbation. In the case of a simple |
1280 |
sensitivity study this array is identical to zero. |
sensitivity study this array is identical to zero. |
1281 |
However, it's specification is essential in the context |
However, it's specification is essential in the context |
1282 |
of automatic differentiation since TAMC |
of automatic differentiation since TAF |
1283 |
treats the corresponding line in the code symbolically |
treats the corresponding line in the code symbolically |
1284 |
when determining the differentiation chain and its origin. |
when determining the differentiation chain and its origin. |
1285 |
Thus, the variable names are part of the argument list |
Thus, the variable names are part of the argument list |
1286 |
when calling TAMC: |
when calling TAF: |
1287 |
% |
% |
1288 |
\begin{verbatim} |
\begin{verbatim} |
1289 |
tamc -input 'xx_tr1 ...' ... |
taf -input 'xx_tr1 ...' ... |
1290 |
\end{verbatim} |
\end{verbatim} |
1291 |
% |
% |
1292 |
Now, as mentioned above, the MITGCM avoids maintaining |
Now, as mentioned above, MITgcm avoids maintaining |
1293 |
an array for each control variable by reading the |
an array for each control variable by reading the |
1294 |
perturbation to a temporary array from file. |
perturbation to a temporary array from file. |
1295 |
To ensure the symbolic link to be recognized by TAMC, a scalar |
To ensure the symbolic link to be recognized by TAF, a scalar |
1296 |
dummy variable {\bf xx\_tr1\_dummy} is introduced |
dummy variable {\bf xx\_tr1\_dummy} is introduced |
1297 |
and an 'active read' routine of the adjoint support |
and an 'active read' routine of the adjoint support |
1298 |
package {\it pkg/autodiff} is invoked. |
package {\it pkg/autodiff} is invoked. |
1299 |
The read-procedure is tagged with the variable |
The read-procedure is tagged with the variable |
1300 |
{\bf xx\_tr1\_dummy} enabling TAMC to recognize the |
{\bf xx\_tr1\_dummy} enabling TAF to recognize the |
1301 |
initialization of the perturbation. |
initialization of the perturbation. |
1302 |
The modified call of TAMC thus reads |
The modified call of TAF thus reads |
1303 |
% |
% |
1304 |
\begin{verbatim} |
\begin{verbatim} |
1305 |
tamc -input 'xx_tr1_dummy ...' ... |
taf -input 'xx_tr1_dummy ...' ... |
1306 |
\end{verbatim} |
\end{verbatim} |
1307 |
% |
% |
1308 |
and the modified operation to (\ref{perturb}) |
and the modified operation to (\ref{perturb}) |