2 |
% $Name$ |
% $Name$ |
3 |
|
|
4 |
\section{Nonlinear Viscosities for Large Eddy Simulation} |
\section{Nonlinear Viscosities for Large Eddy Simulation} |
5 |
\label{sect:nonlin-visc} |
\label{sec:nonlin-visc} |
6 |
|
|
7 |
In Large Eddy Simulations (LES), a turbulent closure needs to be |
In Large Eddy Simulations (LES), a turbulent closure needs to be |
8 |
provided that accounts for the effects of subgridscale motions on the |
provided that accounts for the effects of subgridscale motions on the |
174 |
\end{equation} |
\end{equation} |
175 |
The coefficient {\sf viscC2Smag} is what an MITgcm user sets, and it |
The coefficient {\sf viscC2Smag} is what an MITgcm user sets, and it |
176 |
replaces the proportionality in the Kolmogorov length with an |
replaces the proportionality in the Kolmogorov length with an |
177 |
equality. Others \cite{grha00} suggest values of {\sf viscC2Smag} |
equality. Others \cite{griffies:00} suggest values of {\sf viscC2Smag} |
178 |
from 2.2 to 4 for oceanic problems. Smagorinsky \cite{Smagorinsky93} |
from 2.2 to 4 for oceanic problems. Smagorinsky \cite{Smagorinsky93} |
179 |
shows that values from 0.2 to 0.9 have been used in atmospheric |
shows that values from 0.2 to 0.9 have been used in atmospheric |
180 |
modeling. |
modeling. |
278 |
viscA4GridMin}, which if used, should be set to values $\ll 1$. $L$ |
viscA4GridMin}, which if used, should be set to values $\ll 1$. $L$ |
279 |
is roughly the gridscale (see below). |
is roughly the gridscale (see below). |
280 |
|
|
281 |
Following \cite{grha00}, we note that there is a factor of $\Delta |
Following \cite{griffies:00}, we note that there is a factor of $\Delta |
282 |
x^2/8$ difference between the harmonic and biharmonic viscosities. |
x^2/8$ difference between the harmonic and biharmonic viscosities. |
283 |
Thus, whenever a non-dimensional harmonic coefficient is used in the |
Thus, whenever a non-dimensional harmonic coefficient is used in the |
284 |
MITgcm (\textit{eg.} {\sf viscAhGridMax}$<1$), the biharmonic equivalent is |
MITgcm (\textit{eg.} {\sf viscAhGridMax}$<1$), the biharmonic equivalent is |
305 |
\frac{-\nabla^4_h \BFKav b}{\Pr\BFKRe_4} |
\frac{-\nabla^4_h \BFKav b}{\Pr\BFKRe_4} |
306 |
+\frac{\BFKpds{z} {\BFKav b}}{\Pr\BFKRe_v}\nonumber |
+\frac{\BFKpds{z} {\BFKav b}}{\Pr\BFKRe_v}\nonumber |
307 |
\end{eqnarray} |
\end{eqnarray} |
308 |
\cite{grha00} propose that if one scales the biharmonic viscosity by |
\cite{griffies:00} propose that if one scales the biharmonic viscosity by |
309 |
stability considerations, then the biharmonic viscous terms will be |
stability considerations, then the biharmonic viscous terms will be |
310 |
similarly active to harmonic viscous terms at the gridscale of the |
similarly active to harmonic viscous terms at the gridscale of the |
311 |
model, but much less active on larger scale motions. Similarly, a |
model, but much less active on larger scale motions. Similarly, a |
353 |
+\left(\frac{{\sf viscC4LeithD}}{\pi}\right)^{12} |
+\left(\frac{{\sf viscC4LeithD}}{\pi}\right)^{12} |
354 |
|\nabla^2 \nabla\cdot \BFKav {\bf \BFKtu}_h|^2} |
|\nabla^2 \nabla\cdot \BFKav {\bf \BFKtu}_h|^2} |
355 |
\end{eqnarray} |
\end{eqnarray} |
356 |
Thus, the biharmonic scaling suggested by \cite{grha00} implies: |
Thus, the biharmonic scaling suggested by \cite{griffies:00} implies: |
357 |
\begin{eqnarray} |
\begin{eqnarray} |
358 |
|D| & \propto & L|\nabla^2\BFKav {\bf \BFKtu}_h|\\ |
|D| & \propto & L|\nabla^2\BFKav {\bf \BFKtu}_h|\\ |
359 |
|\nabla \BFKav \omega_3| & \propto & L|\nabla^2 \BFKav \omega_3| |
|\nabla \BFKav \omega_3| & \propto & L|\nabla^2 \BFKav \omega_3| |
360 |
\end{eqnarray} |
\end{eqnarray} |
361 |
It is not at all clear that these assumptions ought to hold. Only the |
It is not at all clear that these assumptions ought to hold. Only the |
362 |
\cite{grha00} forms are currently implemented in MITgcm. |
\cite{griffies:00} forms are currently implemented in MITgcm. |
363 |
|
|
364 |
\subsubsection{Selection of Length Scale} |
\subsubsection{Selection of Length Scale} |
365 |
Above, the length scale of the grid has been denoted $L$. However, in |
Above, the length scale of the grid has been denoted $L$. However, in |