291 |
The no-slip condition defines the normal gradient of a tangential flow |
The no-slip condition defines the normal gradient of a tangential flow |
292 |
such that the flow is zero on the boundary. Rather than modify the |
such that the flow is zero on the boundary. Rather than modify the |
293 |
stresses by using complicated functions of the masks and ``ghost'' |
stresses by using complicated functions of the masks and ``ghost'' |
294 |
points (see \cite{Adcroft+Marshall98}) we add the boundary stresses as |
points (see \cite{adcroft:98}) we add the boundary stresses as |
295 |
an additional source term in cells next to solid boundaries. This has |
an additional source term in cells next to solid boundaries. This has |
296 |
the advantage of being able to cope with ``thin walls'' and also makes |
the advantage of being able to cope with ``thin walls'' and also makes |
297 |
the interior stress calculation (code) independent of the boundary |
the interior stress calculation (code) independent of the boundary |
343 |
\tau_{33} & = & A_v \frac{1}{\Delta r_f} \delta_k w |
\tau_{33} & = & A_v \frac{1}{\Delta r_f} \delta_k w |
344 |
\end{eqnarray} |
\end{eqnarray} |
345 |
It should be noted that in the non-hydrostatic form, the stress tensor |
It should be noted that in the non-hydrostatic form, the stress tensor |
346 |
is even less consistent than for the hydrostatic (see Wazjowicz |
is even less consistent than for the hydrostatic (see |
347 |
\cite{Waojz}). It is well known how to do this properly (see Griffies |
\cite{wajsowicz:93}). It is well known how to do this properly (see |
348 |
\cite{Griffies}) and is on the list of to-do's. |
\cite{griffies:00}) and is on the list of to-do's. |
349 |
|
|
350 |
\fbox{ \begin{minipage}{4.75in} |
\fbox{ \begin{minipage}{4.75in} |
351 |
{\em S/R MOM\_U\_RVISCLFUX} ({\em mom\_u\_rviscflux.F}) |
{\em S/R MOM\_U\_RVISCLFUX} ({\em mom\_u\_rviscflux.F}) |