| 2 |
% $Name$ |
% $Name$ |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
\section{Flux-form momentum equations} |
\section{Flux-form momentum equations} |
| 5 |
|
\label{sec:flux-form_momentum_eqautions} |
| 6 |
|
|
| 7 |
The original finite volume model was based on the Eulerian flux form |
The original finite volume model was based on the Eulerian flux form |
| 8 |
momentum equations. This is the default though the vector invariant |
momentum equations. This is the default though the vector invariant |
| 16 |
\marginpar{$G_w$: {\bf Gw} } |
\marginpar{$G_w$: {\bf Gw} } |
| 17 |
\begin{eqnarray} |
\begin{eqnarray} |
| 18 |
G_u & = & G_u^{adv} + G_u^{cor} + G_u^{h-diss} + G_u^{v-diss} + |
G_u & = & G_u^{adv} + G_u^{cor} + G_u^{h-diss} + G_u^{v-diss} + |
| 19 |
G_u^{metric} + G_u^{nh-metric} \\ |
G_u^{metric} + G_u^{nh-metric} \label{eq:gsplit_momu} \\ |
| 20 |
G_v & = & G_v^{adv} + G_v^{cor} + G_v^{h-diss} + G_v^{v-diss} + |
G_v & = & G_v^{adv} + G_v^{cor} + G_v^{h-diss} + G_v^{v-diss} + |
| 21 |
G_v^{metric} + G_v^{nh-metric} \\ |
G_v^{metric} + G_v^{nh-metric} \label{eq:gsplit_momv} \\ |
| 22 |
G_w & = & G_w^{adv} + G_w^{cor} + G_w^{h-diss} + G_w^{v-diss} + |
G_w & = & G_w^{adv} + G_w^{cor} + G_w^{h-diss} + G_w^{v-diss} + |
| 23 |
G_w^{metric} + G_w^{nh-metric} |
G_w^{metric} + G_w^{nh-metric} \label{eq:gsplit_momw} |
| 24 |
\end{eqnarray} |
\end{eqnarray} |
| 25 |
In the hydrostatic limit, $G_w=0$ and $\epsilon_{nh}=0$, reducing the |
In the hydrostatic limit, $G_w=0$ and $\epsilon_{nh}=0$, reducing the |
| 26 |
vertical momentum to hydrostatic balance. |
vertical momentum to hydrostatic balance. |
| 47 |
{\cal A}_w \Delta r_f h_w G_u^{adv} & = & |
{\cal A}_w \Delta r_f h_w G_u^{adv} & = & |
| 48 |
\delta_i \overline{ U }^i \overline{ u }^i |
\delta_i \overline{ U }^i \overline{ u }^i |
| 49 |
+ \delta_j \overline{ V }^i \overline{ u }^j |
+ \delta_j \overline{ V }^i \overline{ u }^j |
| 50 |
+ \delta_k \overline{ W }^i \overline{ u }^k \\ |
+ \delta_k \overline{ W }^i \overline{ u }^k \label{eq:discrete-momadvu} \\ |
| 51 |
{\cal A}_s \Delta r_f h_s G_v^{adv} & = & |
{\cal A}_s \Delta r_f h_s G_v^{adv} & = & |
| 52 |
\delta_i \overline{ U }^j \overline{ v }^i |
\delta_i \overline{ U }^j \overline{ v }^i |
| 53 |
+ \delta_j \overline{ V }^j \overline{ v }^j |
+ \delta_j \overline{ V }^j \overline{ v }^j |
| 54 |
+ \delta_k \overline{ W }^j \overline{ v }^k \\ |
+ \delta_k \overline{ W }^j \overline{ v }^k \label{eq:discrete-momadvv} \\ |
| 55 |
{\cal A}_c \Delta r_c G_w^{adv} & = & |
{\cal A}_c \Delta r_c G_w^{adv} & = & |
| 56 |
\delta_i \overline{ U }^k \overline{ w }^i |
\delta_i \overline{ U }^k \overline{ w }^i |
| 57 |
+ \delta_j \overline{ V }^k \overline{ w }^j |
+ \delta_j \overline{ V }^k \overline{ w }^j |
| 58 |
+ \delta_k \overline{ W }^k \overline{ w }^k \\ |
+ \delta_k \overline{ W }^k \overline{ w }^k \label{eq:discrete-momadvw} |
| 59 |
\end{eqnarray} |
\end{eqnarray} |
| 60 |
and because of the flux form does not contribute to the global budget |
and because of the flux form does not contribute to the global budget |
| 61 |
of linear momentum. The quantities $U$, $V$ and $W$ are volume fluxes |
of linear momentum. The quantities $U$, $V$ and $W$ are volume fluxes |
| 64 |
\marginpar{$V$: {\bf vTrans} } |
\marginpar{$V$: {\bf vTrans} } |
| 65 |
\marginpar{$W$: {\bf rTrans} } |
\marginpar{$W$: {\bf rTrans} } |
| 66 |
\begin{eqnarray} |
\begin{eqnarray} |
| 67 |
U & = & \Delta y_g \Delta r_f h_w u \\ |
U & = & \Delta y_g \Delta r_f h_w u \label{eq:utrans} \\ |
| 68 |
V & = & \Delta x_g \Delta r_f h_s v \\ |
V & = & \Delta x_g \Delta r_f h_s v \label{eq:vtrans} \\ |
| 69 |
W & = & {\cal A}_c w |
W & = & {\cal A}_c w \label{eq:rtrans} |
| 70 |
\end{eqnarray} |
\end{eqnarray} |
| 71 |
The advection of momentum takes the same form as the advection of |
The advection of momentum takes the same form as the advection of |
| 72 |
tracers but by a translated advective flow. Consequently, the |
tracers but by a translated advective flow. Consequently, the |
| 107 |
\end{eqnarray} |
\end{eqnarray} |
| 108 |
where the Coriolis parameters $f$ and $f'$ are defined: |
where the Coriolis parameters $f$ and $f'$ are defined: |
| 109 |
\begin{eqnarray} |
\begin{eqnarray} |
| 110 |
f & = & 2 \Omega \sin{\phi} \\ |
f & = & 2 \Omega \sin{\varphi} \\ |
| 111 |
f' & = & 2 \Omega \cos{\phi} |
f' & = & 2 \Omega \cos{\varphi} |
| 112 |
\end{eqnarray} |
\end{eqnarray} |
| 113 |
when using spherical geometry, otherwise the $\beta$-plane definition is used: |
where $\varphi$ is geographic latitude when using spherical geometry, |
| 114 |
|
otherwise the $\beta$-plane definition is used: |
| 115 |
\begin{eqnarray} |
\begin{eqnarray} |
| 116 |
f & = & f_o + \beta y \\ |
f & = & f_o + \beta y \\ |
| 117 |
f' & = & 0 |
f' & = & 0 |
| 133 |
\marginpar{Need to change the default in code to match this} |
\marginpar{Need to change the default in code to match this} |
| 134 |
where the subscripts on $f$ and $f'$ indicate evaluation of the |
where the subscripts on $f$ and $f'$ indicate evaluation of the |
| 135 |
Coriolis parameters at the appropriate points in space. The above |
Coriolis parameters at the appropriate points in space. The above |
| 136 |
discretization does {\em not} conserve anything, especially energy. An |
discretization does {\em not} conserve anything, especially energy and |
| 137 |
option to recover this discretization has been retained for backward |
for historical reasons is the default for the code. A |
| 138 |
compatibility testing (set run-time logical {\bf |
flag controls this discretization: set run-time logical {\bf |
| 139 |
useNonconservingCoriolis} to {\em true} which otherwise defaults to |
useEnergyConservingCoriolis} to {\em true} which otherwise defaults to |
| 140 |
{\em false}). |
{\em false}. |
| 141 |
|
|
| 142 |
\fbox{ \begin{minipage}{4.75in} |
\fbox{ \begin{minipage}{4.75in} |
| 143 |
{\em S/R MOM\_CDSCHEME} ({\em mom\_cdscheme.F}) |
{\em S/R MOM\_CDSCHEME} ({\em mom\_cdscheme.F}) |
| 153 |
\subsection{Curvature metric terms} |
\subsection{Curvature metric terms} |
| 154 |
|
|
| 155 |
The most commonly used coordinate system on the sphere is the |
The most commonly used coordinate system on the sphere is the |
| 156 |
geographic system $(\lambda,\phi)$. The curvilinear nature of these |
geographic system $(\lambda,\varphi)$. The curvilinear nature of these |
| 157 |
coordinates on the sphere lead to some ``metric'' terms in the |
coordinates on the sphere lead to some ``metric'' terms in the |
| 158 |
component momentum equations. Under the thin-atmosphere and |
component momentum equations. Under the thin-atmosphere and |
| 159 |
hydrostatic approximations these terms are discretized: |
hydrostatic approximations these terms are discretized: |
| 160 |
\begin{eqnarray} |
\begin{eqnarray} |
| 161 |
{\cal A}_w \Delta r_f h_w G_u^{metric} & = & |
{\cal A}_w \Delta r_f h_w G_u^{metric} & = & |
| 162 |
\overline{ \frac{ \overline{u}^i }{a} \tan{\phi} {\cal A}_c \Delta r_f h_c \overline{ v }^j }^i \\ |
\overline{ \frac{ \overline{u}^i }{a} \tan{\varphi} {\cal A}_c \Delta r_f h_c \overline{ v }^j }^i \\ |
| 163 |
{\cal A}_s \Delta r_f h_s G_v^{metric} & = & |
{\cal A}_s \Delta r_f h_s G_v^{metric} & = & |
| 164 |
- \overline{ \frac{ \overline{u}^i }{a} \tan{\phi} {\cal A}_c \Delta r_f h_c \overline{ u }^i }^j \\ |
- \overline{ \frac{ \overline{u}^i }{a} \tan{\varphi} {\cal A}_c \Delta r_f h_c \overline{ u }^i }^j \\ |
| 165 |
G_w^{metric} & = & 0 |
G_w^{metric} & = & 0 |
| 166 |
\end{eqnarray} |
\end{eqnarray} |
| 167 |
where $a$ is the radius of the planet (sphericity is assumed) or the |
where $a$ is the radius of the planet (sphericity is assumed) or the |
| 168 |
radial distance of the particle (i.e. a function of height). It is |
radial distance of the particle (i.e. a function of height). It is |
| 169 |
easy to see that this discretization satisfies all the properties of |
easy to see that this discretization satisfies all the properties of |
| 170 |
the discrete Coriolis terms since the metric factor $\frac{u}{a} |
the discrete Coriolis terms since the metric factor $\frac{u}{a} |
| 171 |
\tan{\phi}$ can be viewed as a modification of the vertical Coriolis |
\tan{\varphi}$ can be viewed as a modification of the vertical Coriolis |
| 172 |
parameter: $f \rightarrow f+\frac{u}{a} \tan{\phi}$. |
parameter: $f \rightarrow f+\frac{u}{a} \tan{\varphi}$. |
| 173 |
|
|
| 174 |
However, as for the Coriolis terms, a non-energy conserving form has |
However, as for the Coriolis terms, a non-energy conserving form has |
| 175 |
exclusively been used to date: |
exclusively been used to date: |
| 176 |
\begin{eqnarray} |
\begin{eqnarray} |
| 177 |
G_u^{metric} & = & \frac{u \overline{v}^{ij} }{a} \tan{\phi} \\ |
G_u^{metric} & = & \frac{u \overline{v}^{ij} }{a} \tan{\varphi} \\ |
| 178 |
G_v^{metric} & = & \frac{ \overline{u}^{ij} \overline{u}^{ij}}{a} \tan{\phi} |
G_v^{metric} & = & \frac{ \overline{u}^{ij} \overline{u}^{ij}}{a} \tan{\varphi} |
| 179 |
\end{eqnarray} |
\end{eqnarray} |
| 180 |
where $\tan{\phi}$ is evaluated at the $u$ and $v$ points |
where $\tan{\varphi}$ is evaluated at the $u$ and $v$ points |
| 181 |
respectively. |
respectively. |
| 182 |
|
|
| 183 |
\fbox{ \begin{minipage}{4.75in} |
\fbox{ \begin{minipage}{4.75in} |
| 241 |
|
|
| 242 |
The lateral viscous stresses are discretized: |
The lateral viscous stresses are discretized: |
| 243 |
\begin{eqnarray} |
\begin{eqnarray} |
| 244 |
\tau_{11} & = & A_h c_{11\Delta}(\phi) \frac{1}{\Delta x_f} \delta_i u |
\tau_{11} & = & A_h c_{11\Delta}(\varphi) \frac{1}{\Delta x_f} \delta_i u |
| 245 |
-A_4 c_{11\Delta^2}(\phi) \frac{1}{\Delta x_f} \delta_i \nabla^2 u \\ |
-A_4 c_{11\Delta^2}(\varphi) \frac{1}{\Delta x_f} \delta_i \nabla^2 u \\ |
| 246 |
\tau_{12} & = & A_h c_{12\Delta}(\phi) \frac{1}{\Delta y_u} \delta_j u |
\tau_{12} & = & A_h c_{12\Delta}(\varphi) \frac{1}{\Delta y_u} \delta_j u |
| 247 |
-A_4 c_{12\Delta^2}(\phi)\frac{1}{\Delta y_u} \delta_j \nabla^2 u \\ |
-A_4 c_{12\Delta^2}(\varphi)\frac{1}{\Delta y_u} \delta_j \nabla^2 u \\ |
| 248 |
\tau_{21} & = & A_h c_{21\Delta}(\phi) \frac{1}{\Delta x_v} \delta_i v |
\tau_{21} & = & A_h c_{21\Delta}(\varphi) \frac{1}{\Delta x_v} \delta_i v |
| 249 |
-A_4 c_{21\Delta^2}(\phi) \frac{1}{\Delta x_v} \delta_i \nabla^2 v \\ |
-A_4 c_{21\Delta^2}(\varphi) \frac{1}{\Delta x_v} \delta_i \nabla^2 v \\ |
| 250 |
\tau_{22} & = & A_h c_{22\Delta}(\phi) \frac{1}{\Delta y_f} \delta_j v |
\tau_{22} & = & A_h c_{22\Delta}(\varphi) \frac{1}{\Delta y_f} \delta_j v |
| 251 |
-A_4 c_{22\Delta^2}(\phi) \frac{1}{\Delta y_f} \delta_j \nabla^2 v |
-A_4 c_{22\Delta^2}(\varphi) \frac{1}{\Delta y_f} \delta_j \nabla^2 v |
| 252 |
\end{eqnarray} |
\end{eqnarray} |
| 253 |
where the non-dimensional factors $c_{lm\Delta^n}(\phi), \{l,m,n\} \in |
where the non-dimensional factors $c_{lm\Delta^n}(\varphi), \{l,m,n\} \in |
| 254 |
\{1,2\}$ define the ``cosine'' scaling with latitude which can be |
\{1,2\}$ define the ``cosine'' scaling with latitude which can be |
| 255 |
applied in various ad-hoc ways. For instance, $c_{11\Delta} = |
applied in various ad-hoc ways. For instance, $c_{11\Delta} = |
| 256 |
c_{21\Delta} = (\cos{\phi})^{3/2}$, $c_{12\Delta}=c_{22\Delta}=0$ would |
c_{21\Delta} = (\cos{\varphi})^{3/2}$, $c_{12\Delta}=c_{22\Delta}=0$ would |
| 257 |
represent the an-isotropic cosine scaling typically used on the |
represent the an-isotropic cosine scaling typically used on the |
| 258 |
``lat-lon'' grid for Laplacian viscosity. |
``lat-lon'' grid for Laplacian viscosity. |
| 259 |
\marginpar{Need to tidy up method for controlling this in code} |
\marginpar{Need to tidy up method for controlling this in code} |
| 299 |
\begin{eqnarray} |
\begin{eqnarray} |
| 300 |
G_u^{side-drag} & = & |
G_u^{side-drag} & = & |
| 301 |
\frac{4}{\Delta z_f} \overline{ (1-h_\zeta) \frac{\Delta x_v}{\Delta y_u} }^j |
\frac{4}{\Delta z_f} \overline{ (1-h_\zeta) \frac{\Delta x_v}{\Delta y_u} }^j |
| 302 |
\left( A_h c_{12\Delta}(\phi) u - A_4 c_{12\Delta^2}(\phi) \nabla^2 u \right) |
\left( A_h c_{12\Delta}(\varphi) u - A_4 c_{12\Delta^2}(\varphi) \nabla^2 u \right) |
| 303 |
\\ |
\\ |
| 304 |
G_v^{side-drag} & = & |
G_v^{side-drag} & = & |
| 305 |
\frac{4}{\Delta z_f} \overline{ (1-h_\zeta) \frac{\Delta y_u}{\Delta x_v} }^i |
\frac{4}{\Delta z_f} \overline{ (1-h_\zeta) \frac{\Delta y_u}{\Delta x_v} }^i |
| 306 |
\left( A_h c_{21\Delta}(\phi) v - A_4 c_{21\Delta^2}(\phi) \nabla^2 v \right) |
\left( A_h c_{21\Delta}(\varphi) v - A_4 c_{21\Delta^2}(\varphi) \nabla^2 v \right) |
| 307 |
\end{eqnarray} |
\end{eqnarray} |
| 308 |
|
|
| 309 |
In fact, the above discretization is not quite complete because it |
In fact, the above discretization is not quite complete because it |
Parent Directory
| 
Revision Log
| 
Revision Graph
| 
Patch