Parent Directory
| 
Revision Log
| 
Revision Graph
Some more minor changes. To clarify notation I suggest using |delta u| instead of epsilon. Also not that in table it is delta u not epsilon that is reported since there are negative perturbations. Please comment or change if I have missed some subtle point. D.
| 1 | dimitri | 1.6 | DM for PH: What do you mean by the "aspect" of tangent linearity? Is this |
| 2 | standard adjoint linguo? I came up empty in a google search except for MITgcm | ||
| 3 | manual. Please see if text is correct as modified. In CVS compare | ||
| 4 | ceaice_intro_part2.tex, version 1.9 to 1.10. Look for "aspect of | ||
| 5 | \textit{tangent} linearity" and "aspect of tangent linearity" in Line 111 and | ||
| 6 | Line 136, respectively, in version 1.9 and how it was modified in version | ||
| 7 | 1.10. | ||
| 8 | dimitri | 1.3 | |
| 9 | dimitri | 1.6 | Table1: Blabla? |
| 10 | mlosch | 1.4 | |
| 11 | dimitri | 1.6 | check and remove all residual \ml's |
| ViewVC Help | |
| Powered by ViewVC 1.1.22 |