ceaice_split_version/ceaice_part2/ceaice_concl.tex

\section{Discussion and conclusion}
\label{sec:concl}

% Recommendations
% \begin{itemize}
% \item use the LSOR or another implicit solver, because EVP tends to
%   have too weak ice, and is much slower for the recommended time step
%   choices ($\frac{1}{120}$ of the model time step). Linearization does
%   not appear to be an issue for the short time steps used in this
%   study ($\Delta{t} = 20\text{\,min}$), and the LSOR-solver converges
%   quickly (only a few iterations) at each time step, because the
%   forcing changes only slowly within 20\,min.
% \item thermodynamics appears to thave the second largest effect (after
%   EVP vs.\ LSOR)
% \item use a flux limited scheme without explicit diffusion for
%   advecting thermodynamic variables
% \item use no slip boundary conditions, they make more sense
% \item TEM has little effect on the solution, other rheologies that
%   differ more from the elliptic yield curve may have bigger effects
% \item the effects of \citet{hibler87}'s stress formulation on both ice
%   and ocean model need further exploration
% \end{itemize}

%%% Local Variables: 
%%% mode: latex
%%% TeX-master: "ceaice"
%%% End: 
1	heimbach	1.1	\section{Discussion and conclusion}
2			\label{sec:concl}
3
4	mlosch	1.2	% Recommendations
5			% \begin{itemize}
6			% \item use the LSOR or another implicit solver, because EVP tends to
7			% have too weak ice, and is much slower for the recommended time step
8			% choices ($\frac{1}{120}$ of the model time step). Linearization does
9			% not appear to be an issue for the short time steps used in this
10			% study ($\Delta{t} = 20\text{\,min}$), and the LSOR-solver converges
11			% quickly (only a few iterations) at each time step, because the
12			% forcing changes only slowly within 20\,min.
13			% \item thermodynamics appears to thave the second largest effect (after
14			% EVP vs.\ LSOR)
15			% \item use a flux limited scheme without explicit diffusion for
16			% advecting thermodynamic variables
17			% \item use no slip boundary conditions, they make more sense
18			% \item TEM has little effect on the solution, other rheologies that
19			% differ more from the elliptic yield curve may have bigger effects
20			% \item the effects of \citet{hibler87}'s stress formulation on both ice
21			% and ocean model need further exploration
22			% \end{itemize}
23	heimbach	1.1
24			%%% Local Variables:
25			%%% mode: latex
26			%%% TeX-master: "ceaice"
27			%%% End: