| 1 |
$Header: $ |
| 2 |
$Name: $ |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
27-Jul-2008, PH: |
| 5 |
--------------- |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
o |
| 8 |
Can we agree on coherent terminology of |
| 9 |
Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA). |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
ML: OK, done. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
o |
| 14 |
Export numbers for free-slip, noslip are not consistent with what I have. |
| 15 |
Also, do we want to refer to annual mean, or rather integrated annual transport? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
ML: I computed hu = -sum((SIheff+SIhsnow)*SIuice*area)/sum(area) at |
| 18 |
i=100,j=116:122, and then took mean(hu) and std(hu). What are your numbers? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
o |
| 21 |
You've removed a lot of "basic" descriptions which I think need to be |
| 22 |
mentioned first before looking at pecularities |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
ML: OK, assuming that you put it back in, I am happy with the content of |
| 25 |
the text (but changed some wording ... ) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
o |
| 28 |
Figure 5: |
| 29 |
Could you refine zonal grid to 10deg. spacing. |
| 30 |
(e.g. by slightly diminishing label size). |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
ML: I have put ticks every 10deg, but labels every 20deg (not so |
| 33 |
simple with m_grid |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
o |
| 36 |
Figure 6: good, but a bit messy as it is now. |
| 37 |
I suggest to |
| 38 |
* remove bottom row (ice strength) |
| 39 |
* increase size of remaining plots, |
| 40 |
* add more separation between the rows, |
| 41 |
* add another 1-Jul line (in addition to the 1-Jan) line (for better orientation) |
| 42 |
Furthermore, an extra Figure which contains same type of Hovmueller plots for |
| 43 |
* current bottom row (ice strength) |
| 44 |
* row with ice concentration |
| 45 |
* row with ice thickness |
| 46 |
* row with snow thickness |
| 47 |
* row with SST |
| 48 |
(main reason is that ice strenght vs. precip. "correlations" don't fully hold up) |
| 49 |
Finally, would be nice to have a picture |
| 50 |
of the zonal section. |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
ML: it's not a zonal section but a "meridional" (j-) average of grid |
| 54 |
points i=100:130, j=116:122, but maybe a section is a better idea? |
| 55 |
I have now actually removed some of the "inlets" that I have |
| 56 |
carelessly averaged over: |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
i = 100:130; |
| 59 |
j = 116:121; |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
rhoice = 0.92; |
| 62 |
rhosnw = 0.33; |
| 63 |
dxg=rdmds(fullfile('grid','DXG')); |
| 64 |
dyg=rdmds(fullfile('grid','DYG')); |
| 65 |
hf =rdmds(fullfile('grid','hFacC')); |
| 66 |
ar = dxg.*dyg.*hf(:,:,1); |
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
[nx,ny]=size(xc); |
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
arij = ar(i,j); |
| 71 |
% special masking to remove various inlets, etc. |
| 72 |
arij(14:end,6) = 0; |
| 73 |
arij(24:end,5) = 0; |
| 74 |
arij(1:15,1) = 0; |
| 75 |
arij(11,2:3) = 0; |