articles/ceaice/comments_todo.txt

$Header: $
$Name: $

27-Jul-2008, PH:
---------------

o 
Can we agree on coherent terminology of
Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA).

ML: OK, done.

o 
Export numbers for free-slip, noslip are not consistent with what I have.
Also, do we want to refer to annual mean, or rather integrated annual transport?

ML: I computed hu = -sum((SIheff+SIhsnow)*SIuice*area)/sum(area) at
i=100,j=116:122, and then took mean(hu) and std(hu). What are your numbers?

o
You've removed a lot of "basic" descriptions which I think need to be
mentioned first before looking at pecularities

ML: OK, assuming that you put it back in, I am happy with the content of
the text (but changed some wording ... )

o
Figure 5:
Could you refine zonal grid to 10deg. spacing.
(e.g. by slightly diminishing label size).

ML: I have put ticks every 10deg, but labels every 20deg (not so
simple with m_grid

o 
Figure 6: good, but a bit messy as it is now.
I suggest to
* remove bottom row (ice strength)
* increase size of remaining plots,
* add more separation between the rows,
* add another 1-Jul line (in addition to the 1-Jan) line (for better orientation)
Furthermore, an extra Figure which contains same type of Hovmueller plots for
* current bottom row (ice strength)
* row with ice concentration
* row with ice thickness
* row with snow thickness
* row with SST
(main reason is that ice strenght vs. precip. "correlations" don't fully hold up)
Finally, would be nice to have a picture
of the zonal section.


ML: it's not a zonal section but a "meridional" (j-) average of grid
points i=100:130, j=116:122, but maybe a section is a better idea?
I have now actually removed some of the "inlets" that I have
carelessly averaged over:

i = 100:130;
j = 116:121;

rhoice = 0.92;
rhosnw = 0.33;
dxg=rdmds(fullfile('grid','DXG'));
dyg=rdmds(fullfile('grid','DYG'));
hf =rdmds(fullfile('grid','hFacC'));
ar = dxg.*dyg.*hf(:,:,1);

[nx,ny]=size(xc);

arij  = ar(i,j); 
% special masking to remove various inlets, etc.
arij(14:end,6) = 0;
arij(24:end,5) = 0;
arij(1:15,1) = 0;
arij(11,2:3) = 0;
1	mlosch	1.3	$Header: $
2			$Name: $
3
4	heimbach	1.1	27-Jul-2008, PH:
5			---------------
6
7			o
8			Can we agree on coherent terminology of
9			Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA).
10
11	mlosch	1.2	ML: OK, done.
12
13	heimbach	1.1	o
14			Export numbers for free-slip, noslip are not consistent with what I have.
15			Also, do we want to refer to annual mean, or rather integrated annual transport?
16
17	mlosch	1.2	ML: I computed hu = -sum((SIheff+SIhsnow)SIuicearea)/sum(area) at
18			i=100,j=116:122, and then took mean(hu) and std(hu). What are your numbers?
19
20	heimbach	1.1	o
21			You've removed a lot of "basic" descriptions which I think need to be
22			mentioned first before looking at pecularities
23
24	mlosch	1.2	ML: OK, assuming that you put it back in, I am happy with the content of
25			the text (but changed some wording ... )
26
27	heimbach	1.1	o
28			Figure 5:
29			Could you refine zonal grid to 10deg. spacing.
30			(e.g. by slightly diminishing label size).
31
32	mlosch	1.2	ML: I have put ticks every 10deg, but labels every 20deg (not so
33			simple with m_grid
34
35	heimbach	1.1	o
36			Figure 6: good, but a bit messy as it is now.
37			I suggest to
38			* remove bottom row (ice strength)
39			* increase size of remaining plots,
40			* add more separation between the rows,
41			* add another 1-Jul line (in addition to the 1-Jan) line (for better orientation)
42			Furthermore, an extra Figure which contains same type of Hovmueller plots for
43			* current bottom row (ice strength)
44			* row with ice concentration
45			* row with ice thickness
46			* row with snow thickness
47			* row with SST
48			(main reason is that ice strenght vs. precip. "correlations" don't fully hold up)
49			Finally, would be nice to have a picture
50			of the zonal section.
51
52
53	mlosch	1.2	ML: it's not a zonal section but a "meridional" (j-) average of grid
54			points i=100:130, j=116:122, but maybe a section is a better idea?
55			I have now actually removed some of the "inlets" that I have
56	mlosch	1.3	carelessly averaged over:
57
58			i = 100:130;
59			j = 116:121;
60
61			rhoice = 0.92;
62			rhosnw = 0.33;
63			dxg=rdmds(fullfile('grid','DXG'));
64			dyg=rdmds(fullfile('grid','DYG'));
65			hf =rdmds(fullfile('grid','hFacC'));
66			ar = dxg.dyg.hf(:,:,1);
67
68			[nx,ny]=size(xc);
69
70			arij = ar(i,j);
71			% special masking to remove various inlets, etc.
72			arij(14:end,6) = 0;
73			arij(24:end,5) = 0;
74			arij(1:15,1) = 0;
75			arij(11,2:3) = 0;