articles/ceaice/comments_todo.txt

27-Jul-2008, PH:
---------------

o 
Can we agree on coherent terminology of
Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA).

o 
Export numbers for free-slip, noslip are not consistent with what I have.
Also, do we want to refer to annual mean, or rather integrated annual transport?

o
You've removed a lot of "basic" descriptions which I think need to be
mentioned first before looking at pecularities

o
Figure 5:
Could you refine zonal grid to 10deg. spacing.
(e.g. by slightly diminishing label size).

o 
Figure 6: good, but a bit messy as it is now.
I suggest to
* remove bottom row (ice strength)
* increase size of remaining plots,
* add more separation between the rows,
* add another 1-Jul line (in addition to the 1-Jan) line (for better orientation)
Furthermore, an extra Figure which contains same type of Hovmueller plots for
* current bottom row (ice strength)
* row with ice concentration
* row with ice thickness
* row with snow thickness
* row with SST
(main reason is that ice strenght vs. precip. "correlations" don't fully hold up)
Finally, would be nice to have a picture
of the zonal section.


1	heimbach	1.1	27-Jul-2008, PH:
2			---------------
3
4			o
5			Can we agree on coherent terminology of
6			Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA).
7
8			o
9			Export numbers for free-slip, noslip are not consistent with what I have.
10			Also, do we want to refer to annual mean, or rather integrated annual transport?
11
12			o
13			You've removed a lot of "basic" descriptions which I think need to be
14			mentioned first before looking at pecularities
15
16			o
17			Figure 5:
18			Could you refine zonal grid to 10deg. spacing.
19			(e.g. by slightly diminishing label size).
20
21			o
22			Figure 6: good, but a bit messy as it is now.
23			I suggest to
24			* remove bottom row (ice strength)
25			* increase size of remaining plots,
26			* add more separation between the rows,
27			* add another 1-Jul line (in addition to the 1-Jan) line (for better orientation)
28			Furthermore, an extra Figure which contains same type of Hovmueller plots for
29			* current bottom row (ice strength)
30			* row with ice concentration
31			* row with ice thickness
32			* row with snow thickness
33			* row with SST
34			(main reason is that ice strenght vs. precip. "correlations" don't fully hold up)
35			Finally, would be nice to have a picture
36			of the zonal section.
37
38