/[MITgcm]/MITgcm_contrib/articles/ceaice/ceaice_model.tex
ViewVC logotype

Diff of /MITgcm_contrib/articles/ceaice/ceaice_model.tex

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log | View Revision Graph Revision Graph | View Patch Patch

revision 1.3 by mlosch, Thu Feb 28 16:34:56 2008 UTC revision 1.6 by mlosch, Fri Feb 29 16:47:45 2008 UTC
# Line 1  Line 1 
1  \section{Model}  \section{Model Formulation}
2  \label{sec:model}  \label{sec:model}
3    
4    The MITgcm sea ice model (MITsim) is based on a variant of the
5    viscous-plastic (VP) dynamic-thermodynamic sea ice model
6    \citep{zhang97} first introduced by \citet{hibler79, hibler80}. In
7    order to adapt this model to the requirements of coupled
8    ice-ocean simulations, many important aspects of the original code have
9    been modified and improved:
10    \begin{itemize}
11    \item the code has been rewritten for an Arakawa C-grid, both B- and
12      C-grid variants are available; the C-grid code allows for no-slip
13      and free-slip lateral boundary conditions;
14    \item two different solution methods for solving the nonlinear
15      momentum equations have been adopted: LSOR \citep{zhang97}, EVP
16      \citep{hunke97};
17    \item ice-ocean stress can be formulated as in \citet{hibler87};
18    \item ice variables are advected by sophisticated advection schemes;
19    \item growth and melt parameterizaion have been refined and extended
20      in order to allow for automatic differentiation of the code.
21    \end{itemize}
22    The model equations and their numerical realization are summarized
23    below.
24    
25  \subsection{Dynamics}  \subsection{Dynamics}
26  \label{sec:dynamics}  \label{sec:dynamics}
27    
# Line 43  wind/current vectors. Line 64  wind/current vectors.
64    
65  For an isotropic system the stress tensor $\sigma_{ij}$ ($i,j=1,2$) can  For an isotropic system the stress tensor $\sigma_{ij}$ ($i,j=1,2$) can
66  be related to the ice strain rate and strength by a nonlinear  be related to the ice strain rate and strength by a nonlinear
67  viscous-plastic (VP) constitutive law \citep{hibler79, zhang98}:  viscous-plastic (VP) constitutive law \citep{hibler79, zhang97}:
68  \begin{equation}  \begin{equation}
69    \label{eq:vpequation}    \label{eq:vpequation}
70    \sigma_{ij}=2\eta(\dot{\epsilon}_{ij},P)\dot{\epsilon}_{ij}    \sigma_{ij}=2\eta(\dot{\epsilon}_{ij},P)\dot{\epsilon}_{ij}
# Line 205  advect tracers, is really an average ove Line 226  advect tracers, is really an average ove
226  velocity and the ice velocity leading to an inconsistency as the ice  velocity and the ice velocity leading to an inconsistency as the ice
227  temperature and salinity are different from the oceanic variables.  temperature and salinity are different from the oceanic variables.
228    
229  Sea ice distributions are characterized by sharp gradients and edges.  %\subparagraph{boundary conditions: no-slip, free-slip, half-slip}
230  For this reason, we employ positive, multidimensional 2nd and 3rd-order  %\begin{itemize}
231  advection scheme with flux limiter \citep{roe85, hundsdorfer94} for the  %\item transition from existing B-Grid to C-Grid
232  thermodynamic variables discussed in the next section.  %\item boundary conditions: no-slip, free-slip, half-slip
233    %\item fancy (multi dimensional) advection schemes
234  \subparagraph{boundary conditions: no-slip, free-slip, half-slip}  %\item VP vs.\ EVP \citep{hunke97}
235    %\item ocean stress formulation \citep{hibler87}
236  \begin{itemize}  %\end{itemize}
 \item transition from existing B-Grid to C-Grid  
 \item boundary conditions: no-slip, free-slip, half-slip  
 \item fancy (multi dimensional) advection schemes  
 \item VP vs.\ EVP \citep{hunke97}  
 \item ocean stress formulation \citep{hibler87}  
 \end{itemize}  
237    
238  \subsection{Thermodynamics}  \subsection{Thermodynamics}
239  \label{sec:thermodynamics}  \label{sec:thermodynamics}
# Line 242  parameterize this sub-grid scale distrib Line 257  parameterize this sub-grid scale distrib
257  computations, the mean ice thickness $h$ is split into seven thickness  computations, the mean ice thickness $h$ is split into seven thickness
258  categories $H_{n}$ that are equally distributed between $2h$ and  categories $H_{n}$ that are equally distributed between $2h$ and
259  minimum imposed ice thickness of $5\text{\,cm}$ by $H_n=  minimum imposed ice thickness of $5\text{\,cm}$ by $H_n=
260  \frac{2n-1}{7}\,h$ for $n\in[1,7]$. The heat flux for all thickness  \frac{2n-1}{7}\,h$ for $n\in[1,7]$. The heat fluxes computed for each
261  categories is averaged to give the total heat flux.  thickness category area averaged to give the total heat flux. \ml{[I
262      don't have citation for that, anyone?]}
263    
264  The atmospheric heat flux is balanced by an oceanic heat flux from  The atmospheric heat flux is balanced by an oceanic heat flux from
265  below.  The oceanic flux is proportional to  below.  The oceanic flux is proportional to
# Line 266  the ice surface is back at $z=0$ \citep{ Line 282  the ice surface is back at $z=0$ \citep{
282    
283  Effective ich thickness (ice volume per unit area,  Effective ich thickness (ice volume per unit area,
284  $c\cdot{h}$), concentration $c$ and effective snow thickness  $c\cdot{h}$), concentration $c$ and effective snow thickness
285  ($c\cdot{h}_{snow}$) are advected by ice velocities as described in  ($c\cdot{h}_{s}$) are advected by ice velocities:
286  \refsec{dynamics}. From the various advection scheme that are  \begin{equation}
287  available in the MITgcm \citep{mitgcm02}, we choose flux-limited    \label{eq:advection}
288  schemes to preserve sharp gradients and edges and to rule out    \frac{\partial{X}}{\partial{t}} = - \nabla\cdot\left(\vek{u}\,X\right) +
289  unphysical over- and undershoots (negative thickness or    \Gamma_{X} + D_{X}
290  concentration). These scheme conserve volume and horizontal area.  \end{equation}
291  \ml{[do we need to proove that? can we proove that? citation?]}  where $\Gamma_X$ are the thermodynamic source terms and $D_{X}$ the
292    diffusive terms for quantities $X=(c\cdot{h}), c, (c\cdot{h}_{s})$.
293    %
294    From the various advection scheme that are available in the MITgcm
295    \citep{mitgcm02}, we choose flux-limited schemes
296    \citep[multidimensional 2nd and 3rd-order advection scheme with flux
297    limiter][]{roe85, hundsdorfer94} to preserve sharp gradients and edges
298    that are typical of sea ice distributions and to rule out unphysical
299    over- and undershoots (negative thickness or concentration). These
300    scheme conserve volume and horizontal area and are unconditionally
301    stable, so that we can set $D_{X}=0$.  \ml{[do we need to proove that?
302      can we proove that? citation?]}
303    
304  There is considerable doubt about the reliability of such a simple  There is considerable doubt about the reliability of such a simple
305  thermodynamic model---\citet{semtner84} found significant errors in  thermodynamic model---\citet{semtner84} found significant errors in

Legend:
Removed from v.1.3  
changed lines
  Added in v.1.6

  ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.22