1 |
\section{Introduction} |
\section{Introduction} |
2 |
\label{sec:intro} |
\label{sec:intro} |
3 |
|
|
4 |
In the past five years, oceanographic state estimation has matured to the |
In recent years, oceanographic state estimation has matured to the |
5 |
extent that estimates of the evolving circulation of the ocean constrained by |
extent that estimates of the evolving circulation of the ocean constrained by |
6 |
in-situ and remotely sensed global observations are now routinely available |
in-situ and remotely sensed global observations are now routinely available |
7 |
and being applied to myriad scientific problems \citep{wun07}. Ocean state |
and being applied to myriad scientific problems \citep{wun07}. Ocean state |
8 |
estimation is the process of fitting an ocean general circulation model (GCM) |
estimation is the process of fitting an ocean General Circulation Model (GCM) |
9 |
to a multitude of observations. As formulated by the consortium Estimating |
to a multitude of observations. As formulated by the consortium for Estimating |
10 |
the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean (ECCO), an automatic differentiation |
the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean (ECCO), an automatic differentiation |
11 |
tool is used to calculate the so-called adjoint code of a GCM. The method of |
tool is used to calculate the so-called adjoint code of a GCM. The method of |
12 |
Lagrange multipliers is then used to render the problem one of unconstrained |
Lagrange multipliers is then used to render the problem one of unconstrained |
13 |
least-squares minimization. Although much has been achieved, the existing |
least-squares minimization. Although much has been achieved, the existing |
14 |
ECCO estimates lack intercative sea ice. This limits the ability of ECCO to |
ECCO estimates lack interactive sea ice. This limits the ability to |
15 |
utilize satellite data constraints over sea-ice covered regions. This also |
utilize satellite data constraints over sea-ice covered regions. This also |
16 |
limits the usefulness of the ECCO ocean state estimates for describing and |
limits the usefulness of the derived ocean state estimates for describing and |
17 |
studying polar-subpolar interactions. |
studying polar-subpolar interactions. This paper is a first step towards |
18 |
|
adding sea-ice capability to the ECCO estimates. That is, we describe a |
19 |
|
dynamic and thermodynamic sea ice model that has been coupled to the |
20 |
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology general circulation model |
21 |
|
\citep[MITgcm][]{mar97a} and that has been modified to permit efficient and |
22 |
|
accurate automatic differentiation. |
23 |
|
|
24 |
The availability of an adjoint model as a powerful research tool |
The availability of an adjoint model as a powerful research tool |
25 |
complementary to an ocean model was a major design requirement early |
complementary to an ocean model was a major design requirement early |
26 |
on in the development of the MIT general circulation model (MITgcm) |
on in the development of the MITgcm \citep{marotzke99}. It |
|
[Marshall et al. 1997a, Marotzke et al. 1999, Adcroft et al. 2002]. It |
|
27 |
was recognized that the adjoint model permitted computing the |
was recognized that the adjoint model permitted computing the |
28 |
gradients of various scalar-valued model diagnostics, norms or, |
gradients of various scalar-valued model diagnostics, norms or, |
29 |
generally, objective functions with respect to external or independent |
generally, objective functions with respect to external or independent |
48 |
Traditionally, probably for historical reasons and the ease of |
Traditionally, probably for historical reasons and the ease of |
49 |
treating the Coriolis term, most standard sea-ice models are |
treating the Coriolis term, most standard sea-ice models are |
50 |
discretized on Arakawa-B-grids \citep[e.g.,][]{hibler79, harder99, |
discretized on Arakawa-B-grids \citep[e.g.,][]{hibler79, harder99, |
51 |
kreyscher00, zhang98, hunke97}\ml{, although there are sea ice only |
kreyscher00, zhang98, hunke97}, although there are sea ice models |
52 |
models diretized on a C-grid \citep[e.g.,][]{ip91, tremblay97, |
diretized on a C-grid \citep[e.g.,][]{ip91, tremblay97, |
53 |
lemieux09}}. From the perspective of coupling a sea ice-model to a |
lemieux09}. % |
54 |
C-grid ocean model, the exchange of fluxes of heat and fresh-water |
\ml{[there is also MI-IM, but I only found this as a reference: |
55 |
pose no difficulty for a B-grid sea-ice model |
\url{http://retro.met.no/english/r_and_d_activities/method/num_mod/MI-IM-Documentation.pdf}]} |
56 |
\citep[e.g.,][]{timmermann02a}. However, surface stress is defined at |
From the perspective of coupling a sea ice-model to a C-grid ocean |
57 |
velocities points and thus needs to be interpolated between a B-grid |
model, the exchange of fluxes of heat and fresh-water pose no |
58 |
sea-ice model and a C-grid ocean model. Smoothing implicitly |
difficulty for a B-grid sea-ice model \citep[e.g.,][]{timmermann02a}. |
59 |
associated with this interpolation may mask grid scale noise and may |
However, surface stress is defined at velocities points and thus needs |
60 |
contribute to stabilizing the solution. On the other hand, by |
to be interpolated between a B-grid sea-ice model and a C-grid ocean |
61 |
smoothing the stress signals are damped which could lead to reduced |
model. Smoothing implicitly associated with this interpolation may |
62 |
variability of the system. By choosing a C-grid for the sea-ice model, |
mask grid scale noise and may contribute to stabilizing the solution. |
63 |
we circumvent this difficulty altogether and render the stress |
On the other hand, by smoothing the stress signals are damped which |
64 |
coupling as consistent as the buoyancy coupling. |
could lead to reduced variability of the system. By choosing a C-grid |
65 |
|
for the sea-ice model, we circumvent this difficulty altogether and |
66 |
|
render the stress coupling as consistent as the buoyancy coupling. |
67 |
|
|
68 |
A further advantage of the C-grid formulation is apparent in narrow |
A further advantage of the C-grid formulation is apparent in narrow |
69 |
straits. In the limit of only one grid cell between coasts there is no |
straits. In the limit of only one grid cell between coasts there is no |
70 |
flux allowed for a B-grid (with no-slip lateral boundary counditions), |
flux allowed for a B-grid (with no-slip lateral boundary counditions), |
71 |
and models have used topographies artificially widened straits to |
and models have used topographies with artificially widened straits to |
72 |
avoid this problem \citep{holloway07}. The C-grid formulation on the |
avoid this problem \citep{holloway07}. The C-grid formulation on the |
73 |
other hand allows a flux of sea-ice through narrow passages if |
other hand allows a flux of sea-ice through narrow passages if |
74 |
free-slip along the boundaries is allowed. We demonstrate this effect |
free-slip along the boundaries is allowed. We demonstrate this effect |
77 |
Talk about problems that make the sea-ice-ocean code very sensitive and |
Talk about problems that make the sea-ice-ocean code very sensitive and |
78 |
changes in the code that reduce these sensitivities. |
changes in the code that reduce these sensitivities. |
79 |
|
|
80 |
This paper describes the MITgcm sea ice |
This paper describes the MITgcm sea ice model; it presents example |
81 |
model; it presents example Arctic and Antarctic results from a realistic, |
Arctic and Antarctic results from a realistic, eddy-permitting, global |
82 |
eddy-permitting, global ocean and sea-ice configuration; it compares B-grid |
ocean and sea-ice configuration; it compares B-grid and C-grid dynamic |
83 |
and C-grid dynamic solvers in a regional Arctic configuration; and it presents |
solvers and investigates further aspects of sea ice modeling in a |
84 |
example results from coupled ocean and sea-ice adjoint-model integrations. |
regional Arctic configuration; and it presents example results from |
85 |
|
coupled ocean and sea-ice adjoint-model integrations. |
86 |
|
|
87 |
%%% Local Variables: |
%%% Local Variables: |
88 |
%%% mode: latex |
%%% mode: latex |