44 |
Traditionally, probably for historical reasons and the ease of |
Traditionally, probably for historical reasons and the ease of |
45 |
treating the Coriolis term, most standard sea-ice models are |
treating the Coriolis term, most standard sea-ice models are |
46 |
discretized on Arakawa-B-grids \citep[e.g.,][]{hibler79, harder99, |
discretized on Arakawa-B-grids \citep[e.g.,][]{hibler79, harder99, |
47 |
kreyscher00, zhang98, hunke97}. From the perspective of coupling a |
kreyscher00, zhang98, hunke97}\ml{, although there are sea ice only |
48 |
sea ice-model to a C-grid ocean model, the exchange of fluxes of heat |
models diretized on a C-grid \citep[e.g.,][]{tremblay97, |
49 |
and fresh-water pose no difficulty for a B-grid sea-ice model |
lemieux09}}. From the perspective of coupling a sea ice-model to a |
50 |
|
C-grid ocean model, the exchange of fluxes of heat and fresh-water |
51 |
|
pose no difficulty for a B-grid sea-ice model |
52 |
\citep[e.g.,][]{timmermann02a}. However, surface stress is defined at |
\citep[e.g.,][]{timmermann02a}. However, surface stress is defined at |
53 |
velocities points and thus needs to be interpolated between a B-grid |
velocities points and thus needs to be interpolated between a B-grid |
54 |
sea-ice model and a C-grid ocean model. Smoothing implicitly |
sea-ice model and a C-grid ocean model. Smoothing implicitly |
76 |
eddy-permitting, global ocean and sea-ice configuration; it compares B-grid |
eddy-permitting, global ocean and sea-ice configuration; it compares B-grid |
77 |
and C-grid dynamic solvers in a regional Arctic configuration; and it presents |
and C-grid dynamic solvers in a regional Arctic configuration; and it presents |
78 |
example results from coupled ocean and sea-ice adjoint-model integrations. |
example results from coupled ocean and sea-ice adjoint-model integrations. |
79 |
|
|
80 |
|
%%% Local Variables: |
81 |
|
%%% mode: latex |
82 |
|
%%% TeX-master: "ceaice" |
83 |
|
%%% End: |