articles/ceaice/ceaice_concl.tex

\section{Discussion and conclusion}
\label{sec:concl}

The story of the paper could be:
B-grid ice model + C-grid ocean model does not work properly for us,
therefore C-grid ice model  with advantages: 
\begin{enumerate}
\item stress coupling simpler (no interpolation required)
\item different boundary conditions
\item advection schemes carry over trivially from main code
\end{enumerate}
LSR/EVP solutions are similar with appropriate bcs, evp parameters as
a function of forcing time scale (when does VP solution break
down). Same for LSR solver, provided that it works (o: 
Which scheme is more efficient for the resolution/time stepping
parameters that we use here. What about other resolutions?
1	\section{Discussion and conclusion}
2	\label{sec:concl}
3
4	The story of the paper could be:
5	B-grid ice model + C-grid ocean model does not work properly for us,
6	therefore C-grid ice model with advantages:
7	\begin{enumerate}
8	\item stress coupling simpler (no interpolation required)
9	\item different boundary conditions
10	\item advection schemes carry over trivially from main code
11	\end{enumerate}
12	LSR/EVP solutions are similar with appropriate bcs, evp parameters as
13	a function of forcing time scale (when does VP solution break
14	down). Same for LSR solver, provided that it works (o:
15	Which scheme is more efficient for the resolution/time stepping
16	parameters that we use here. What about other resolutions?