/[MITgcm]/MITgcm_contrib/articles/ceaice/ceaice_concl.tex
ViewVC logotype

Diff of /MITgcm_contrib/articles/ceaice/ceaice_concl.tex

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log | View Revision Graph Revision Graph | View Patch Patch

revision 1.1 by dimitri, Tue Feb 26 19:27:26 2008 UTC revision 1.2 by mlosch, Wed Jun 4 13:29:45 2008 UTC
# Line 1  Line 1 
1  \section{Discussion and conclusion}  \section{Discussion and conclusion}
2  \label{sec:concl}  \label{sec:concl}
3    
4  The story of the paper could be:  Recommendations
5  B-grid ice model + C-grid ocean model does not work properly for us,  \begin{itemize}
6  therefore C-grid ice model  with advantages:  \item use the LSOR or another implicit solver, because EVP tends to
7  \begin{enumerate}    have too weak ice, and is much slower for the recommended time step
8  \item stress coupling simpler (no interpolation required)    choices ($\frac{1}{120}$ of the model time step). Linearization does
9  \item different boundary conditions    not appear to be an issue for the short time steps used in this
10  \item advection schemes carry over trivially from main code    study ($\Delta{t} = 20\text{\,min}$), and the LSOR-solver converges
11  \end{enumerate}    quickly (only a few iterations) at each time step, because the
12  LSR/EVP solutions are similar with appropriate bcs, evp parameters as    forcing changes only slowly within 20\,min.
13  a function of forcing time scale (when does VP solution break  \item thermodynamics appears to thave the second largest effect (after
14  down). Same for LSR solver, provided that it works (o:    EVP vs.\ LSOR)
15  Which scheme is more efficient for the resolution/time stepping  \item use a flux limited scheme without explicit diffusion for
16  parameters that we use here. What about other resolutions?    advecting thermodynamic variables
17    \item use no slip boundary conditions, they make more sense
18    \item TEM has little effect on the solution, other rheologies that
19      differ more from the elliptic yield curve may have bigger effects
20    \item the effects of \citet{hibler87}'s stress formulation on both ice
21      and ocean model need further exploration
22    \end{itemize}
23    
24    %%% Local Variables:
25    %%% mode: latex
26    %%% TeX-master: "ceaice"
27    %%% End:

Legend:
Removed from v.1.1  
changed lines
  Added in v.1.2

  ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.22