articles/ceaice/ceaice_concl.tex

\section{Discussion and conclusion}
\label{sec:concl}

The story of the paper could be:
B-grid ice model + C-grid ocean model does not work properly for us,
therefore C-grid ice model  with advantages: 
\begin{enumerate}
\item stress coupling simpler (no interpolation required)
\item different boundary conditions
\item advection schemes carry over trivially from main code
\end{enumerate}
LSR/EVP solutions are similar with appropriate bcs, evp parameters as
a function of forcing time scale (when does VP solution break
down). Same for LSR solver, provided that it works (o: 
Which scheme is more efficient for the resolution/time stepping
parameters that we use here. What about other resolutions?
1	dimitri	1.1	\section{Discussion and conclusion}
2			\label{sec:concl}
3
4			The story of the paper could be:
5			B-grid ice model + C-grid ocean model does not work properly for us,
6			therefore C-grid ice model with advantages:
7			\begin{enumerate}
8			\item stress coupling simpler (no interpolation required)
9			\item different boundary conditions
10			\item advection schemes carry over trivially from main code
11			\end{enumerate}
12			LSR/EVP solutions are similar with appropriate bcs, evp parameters as
13			a function of forcing time scale (when does VP solution break
14			down). Same for LSR solver, provided that it works (o:
15			Which scheme is more efficient for the resolution/time stepping
16			parameters that we use here. What about other resolutions?