212 |
\ml{[which equation do you mean?]}) along a zonal axis through |
\ml{[which equation do you mean?]}) along a zonal axis through |
213 |
Lancaster Sound, Barrow Strait, and Melville Sound (115\degW\ to |
Lancaster Sound, Barrow Strait, and Melville Sound (115\degW\ to |
214 |
80\degW, averaged across the passages) are depicted as Hovmueller |
80\degW, averaged across the passages) are depicted as Hovmueller |
215 |
diagrams in \reffig{lancaster}. These are, from top to bottom, the |
diagrams in \reffig{lancasteradj}. These are, from top to bottom, the |
216 |
sensitivities with respect to effective ice thickness ($hc$), ocean |
sensitivities with respect to effective ice thickness ($hc$), ocean |
217 |
surface temperature ($SST$) and precipitation ($p$) for free slip |
surface temperature ($SST$) and precipitation ($p$) for free slip |
218 |
(left column) and no slip (right column) ice drift boundary |
(left column) and no slip (right column) ice drift boundary |
220 |
% |
% |
221 |
\begin{figure*} |
\begin{figure*} |
222 |
\includegraphics*[height=.8\textheight]{\fpath/lancaster_adj} |
\includegraphics*[height=.8\textheight]{\fpath/lancaster_adj} |
223 |
\caption{Hovermoeller diagrams of sensitivities (derivatives) of the |
\caption{Hovermoeller diagrams along the axis Viscount Melville |
224 |
``solid'' fresh water (i.e., ice and snow) export $J$ through Lancaster sound |
Sound/Barrow Strait/Lancaster Sound. The diagrams show the |
225 |
|
sensitivities (derivatives) of the ``solid'' fresh water (i.e., |
226 |
|
ice and snow) export $J$ through Lancaster sound |
227 |
(\reffig{arctic_topog}, cross-section G) with respect to effective |
(\reffig{arctic_topog}, cross-section G) with respect to effective |
228 |
ice thickness ($hc$), ocean surface temperature (SST) and |
ice thickness ($hc$), ocean surface temperature (SST) and |
229 |
precipitation ($p$) for two runs with free slip and no slip boundary |
precipitation ($p$) for two runs with free slip and no slip |
230 |
conditions for the sea ice drift. Also shown it the normalized ice |
boundary conditions for the sea ice drift. Each plot is overlaid |
231 |
strengh $P/P^*=(hc)\,\exp[-C\,(1-c)]$ (bottom panel); each plot is |
with the contours 1 and 3 of the normalized ice strengh |
232 |
overlaid with the contours 1 and 3 of the normalized ice strength |
$P/P^*=(hc)\,\exp[-C\,(1-c)]$ for orientation. |
233 |
for orientation. |
\label{fig:lancasteradj}} |
234 |
\label{fig:lancaster}} |
\end{figure*} |
235 |
|
% |
236 |
|
\begin{figure*} |
237 |
|
\includegraphics*[height=.8\textheight]{\fpath/lancaster_fwd} |
238 |
|
\caption{Hovermoeller diagrams along the axis Viscount Melville |
239 |
|
Sound/Barrow Strait/Lancaster Sound of effective ice thickness |
240 |
|
($hc$), effective snow thickness ($h_{s}c$) and normalized ice |
241 |
|
strengh $P/P^*=(hc)\,\exp[-C\,(1-c)]$ for two runs with free slip |
242 |
|
and no slip boundary conditions for the sea ice drift. Each plot |
243 |
|
is overlaid with the contours 1 and 3 of the normalized ice |
244 |
|
strength for orientation. |
245 |
|
\label{fig:lancasterfwd}} |
246 |
\end{figure*} |
\end{figure*} |
247 |
% |
% |
248 |
|
|
320 |
\ml{[Here we need for integrations to show that the adjoint |
\ml{[Here we need for integrations to show that the adjoint |
321 |
sensitivites are not just academic. I suggest to perturb HEFF |
sensitivites are not just academic. I suggest to perturb HEFF |
322 |
and THETA initial conditions, and PRECIP somewhere in the Melville |
and THETA initial conditions, and PRECIP somewhere in the Melville |
323 |
Sound and then produce plots similar to reffig{lancaster}. For |
Sound and then produce plots similar to reffig{lancasteradj}. For |
324 |
PRECIP it would be great to have two perturbation experiments, one |
PRECIP it would be great to have two perturbation experiments, one |
325 |
where ADJprecip is posivite and one where ADJprecip is negative]} |
where ADJprecip is posivite and one where ADJprecip is negative]} |
326 |
|
|