/[MITgcm]/MITgcm/verification/lab_sea/input_ad/data.seaice
ViewVC logotype

Annotation of /MITgcm/verification/lab_sea/input_ad/data.seaice

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log | View Revision Graph Revision Graph


Revision 1.3 - (hide annotations) (download)
Tue Apr 24 21:32:11 2007 UTC (17 years ago) by heimbach
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: checkpoint59d, checkpoint59a, checkpoint59c, checkpoint59b
Changes since 1.2: +1 -1 lines
o remove SEAICEuseEVP flag
o set SEAICE_EVP = 1.E-8
  This fixes the 1.E34 gradient, but 1.E-9 would not fix them
  Question is whether that epsilon is small enough, and why
  it is so sensitive;
  Likely culprit is new code in seaice_evp.F:
             deltaC = SQRT(MAX(deltaC,SEAICE_EPS_SQ))
             deltaZ = SQRT(MAX(deltaZ,SEAICE_EPS_SQ))

1 heimbach 1.1 # SEAICE parameters
2     &SEAICE_PARM01
3     SEAICEwriteState = .TRUE.,
4     SEAICE_initialHEFF = 1.0,
5     SEAICE_deltaTtherm = 3600.,
6     SEAICE_deltaTdyn = 3600.,
7     SEAICEuseDYNAMICS =.TRUE.,
8     LSR_ERROR = 1.E-6,
9 heimbach 1.2 SEAICE_deltaTevp = 60,
10 heimbach 1.3 SEAICE_EPS = 1.E-8,
11 heimbach 1.1 # SEAICE_tave_mnc = .FALSE.,
12     # SEAICE_dump_mnc = .FALSE.,
13     # SEAICE_mon_mnc = .FALSE.,
14     &
15     &SEAICE_PARM02
16     mult_ice = 1.,
17     # choose which seaice cost term you want
18     cost_ice_flag = 1,
19     # the following timings are obsolete;
20     # replaced by lastinterval
21     costIceStart1 = 20000101,
22     costIceStart2 = 00000,
23     costIceEnd1 = 20000201,
24     costIceEnd2 = 00000,
25     &

  ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.22