/[MITgcm]/MITgcm/verification/lab_sea/input_ad/data.grdchk
ViewVC logotype

Contents of /MITgcm/verification/lab_sea/input_ad/data.grdchk

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log | View Revision Graph Revision Graph


Revision 1.1 - (show annotations) (download)
Fri Dec 15 18:11:59 2006 UTC (17 years, 4 months ago) by heimbach
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: checkpoint58u_post, checkpoint58w_post, checkpoint60, checkpoint61, checkpoint62, checkpoint58x_post, checkpoint58t_post, checkpoint59q, checkpoint59p, checkpoint59r, checkpoint59e, checkpoint59d, checkpoint59g, checkpoint59f, checkpoint59a, checkpoint59c, checkpoint59b, checkpoint59m, checkpoint59l, checkpoint59o, checkpoint59n, checkpoint59i, checkpoint59h, checkpoint59k, checkpoint59j, checkpoint59, checkpoint62c, checkpoint62b, checkpoint62a, checkpoint62d, checkpoint58y_post, checkpoint58v_post, checkpoint61f, checkpoint61g, checkpoint61d, checkpoint61e, checkpoint61b, checkpoint61c, checkpoint61a, checkpoint61n, checkpoint61o, checkpoint61l, checkpoint61m, checkpoint61j, checkpoint61k, checkpoint61h, checkpoint61i, checkpoint61v, checkpoint61w, checkpoint61t, checkpoint61u, checkpoint61r, checkpoint61s, checkpoint61p, checkpoint61q, checkpoint61z, checkpoint61x, checkpoint61y
Initial check-in of lab_sea adjoint
(very similar to natl_box_adjoint/code_seaice)
* used C-grid and EVP solver
* used KPP, GM/Redi
* uses inAdExact=.TRUE.
* gradient checks fail for both ADM and TLM
  due to sensitive snow melt code in seaice_grwoth (look for "JZ")
  f.d. gradients actually seem more problematic than ADM, TLM gradients;
  issue is related to forward mismatch between g77 an ifort

1
2 # *******************
3 # ECCO gradient check
4 # *******************
5 &GRDCHK_NML
6 grdchk_eps = 1.d-4,
7 nbeg = 4,
8 nstep = 1,
9 nend = 8,
10 grdchkvarindex = 7,
11 &

  ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.22